Jump to content

Tyberius06

Member
  • Content Count

    441
  • Joined

  • Last Visited

  • Most Liked  

    2

About Tyberius06

  • Rank
    Citizen

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Henley-On-Thames, UK
  • City-building game(s)
    SimCity 4
    Cities: Skylines
    Cities XL

Recent Profile Visitors

1,130 Profile Views
  1. Can't find it?... Ask here!

    I think those are NOB japanese walls or MAS71 japanese walls, but as I remember there is some relation between them. You can find those here: http://hide-inoki.com/~nob/index.html See the attached picture: those are the WALL related uploads... more information and pics about them by clicking on the "organe I" - Tyberius
  2. SM2 Rutger Hauer Station

    I keep saying, I love those base textures @Aarsgevogeltemade a really nice building and you reused that building in a very handy and special way! Station building at the Stationsstraat I like the new props, thank you very much! - Tyberius
  3. Should the 5 Star Rating System be Removed on ST ?

    Why do we need the scores? The scores to be needed in competitions in general, but here on this site/exchange in this matter there are no competitions. I read your reviews on those uploads, and I couldn't disagree with you, and yes, you provided advice and help for the creator, and it's fine. Mathias mentioned above something about the site engine and how the reviews are related with the star-score-system, but on one hand the reviews are usefull and necessary things specially when one doesn't have a development thread to discuss ones progress on ones projects, but the STARS (just the STARS, not the reviews) are totally unnecessary and can be discouraging. It's different with book or movies, where the review with scores tells you if the movie/book worths your money or not, but we can't really talk about here financial benefits, so the scores doesn't really have functions, but they have a sub-level meaning about the content (excellent - not that shit, but still shit - totally shit). And what the user see first is not the review, but the STARS... So I agree with keeping the reviews, and disagree keeping the STARS - but if technicaly can't be done that, well that sucks...
  4. Should the 5 Star Rating System be Removed on ST ?

    Nope, you simply missunderstood what I was writing. If one writes about a content full of possitive things and one doesn't mention any negativ thing, why that person gives only 4 instead of 5. There is no reason. Ok, look it again. 13 for leave everything as is. 15 for to make changes. Nope, what I'm saying the LIKE buttons could stay (there is dislike option in between them - the NO), and you can leave reviews, what I don't need and others don't need as well is the score rating system, because that's highly unfair. F.e. in the current system: I don't know what Double Decker Bars are. I've never met with them. If it looks nice I will LIKE it and appreciate the creator effort on it, if I use it and like it I will leave a review. If the quality of the lot/BAT etc is satisfying, but I won't use it because I don't like the concept, I will leave a comment, but won't donwrate it just because I don't like the concept. I'm not really using skyscapers, because I'm not a huge fan of them, but I can see the quality and the work behind them, so either I don't rate it at all, or just leave a comment, but won't give STARs... So once again, my problem is not with the reviews, rather with the score rating system. It's not a competition, I guess, so I don't think we need something which makes differences between creators different level and style works by a score rating system. The reviews by themself should be enough to express if the creation is not matching with ones expectations in whatever reasons. - Tyberius
  5. Simmer2's Lots and BATs Lab

    I found some of Mozokuss's models are animated. However it doesn't look HD...
  6. Should the 5 Star Rating System be Removed on ST ?

    @Glenni My problem and some other people's problem is with the rating system, that lots of people too ignorant to know what they are rating about. Some newbe come and downrate something because it has dependencies, OR it has broken dependencies. Instead of (second case of course) reporting the file about the broken dep links to the staff one just give it a 1 star or 2 or 3, but it doesn't seem to be fair to me. Specially in the cases of old uploads... I found many downrated stuff because of broken dep links, so I actually reported them and they got the fix. I found expansions for Oppies canal set, which used Gizmos vechicle pack V3 (which has differen prop IDs than the updated V4) and in the last 13-14 years, but not even the first 2 years when that pack was more known nobody figured it out what the missing proppack was, but it got downrates due to the missing props (OK, it's too old, too small/unremarkable and the creator was ignorant aswell not to list the above mentioned pack as a dependencies, because he thought the deps part of the original Rush Hour... Or other case, when one says about an upload "thats really wonderfull, and nice and well needed etc..." than give a 4 for it... WTF??? That's a downrate aswell, especially when we are talking about 2-4 reviews per upload in some cases... So if it's so wonderfull, why it's just 4 of 5 stars??? I personally care about the comments and reviews, but not care about the STARS, because they are kind of BS just because the above mentioned examples.... And yeah, there are the idiots with the attitude and the 1 stars... - Tyberius
  7. NAM: Development

    @TarkusWTF?????? (Where are The Foxes????) This last picture, I can't really understand what I'm looking at Well, does it mean that we are approaching to the elevated NWM networks? Amazing work! Thank you very much! - Tyberius
  8. The Village

    Uh... that's kind of amazing work over there Really nice! Simmer's dry walls in good use indeed, I like how you treated them I also like the idea with the bushes... - Tyberius
  9. King's Community & Regional Park Pack, Vol. 2

    Really nice stuffs! Thanks for sharing them! - Tyberius
  10. Oh, wow, this is techno, but so different, what I usually listen...
  11. Should the 5 Star Rating System be Removed on ST ?

    Hi! I understand this, but in this particular situation he (His Divine Hand) blamed me why he is giving 1 star to Imca9000's BAT, because (what was that phrase?) he was taken to task by ME about his previous really bad choice of words (and I was polite). And than he just dropped there an other escuse about using NAM as a dependency... He rated me and my complain about his previous behaviour and he didn't actually rate Imca's BAT... The first was a bad phrasing which could have multiple meanings so it can be offensive, but his rating on the next BAT of Imca9000 was clearly an insult not just against me (because I wouldn't give a sh.... for that, but that was an insult against an innocent party who just made a BAT again... It's not about the fact that he underrated something, is about the why...? And that was an unfair behaviour... - Tyberius
  12. SM2 Shocking Jimmy's Electrical Supplies

    Oh, man! One day two lots and a prop pack??!! Bravo! Köszönöm szépen!
  13. SM2 Wind Power Inc.

    Thank you for sharing this nice industrial lot and of course the beautiful props too. Instant 5 starts, the time sequence and the quality of the props and custom textures deserve the highest rate! - Tyberius
  14. Simmer2's Lots and BATs Lab

    Thanks! That's awesome! It looks really beautiful! - Tyberius
  15. SM2 Concrete Sound Barriers

    Really nice set of walls! They will fit nicely in any area and eventually for me, they will replace the older DeadWood Highway Walls. Also there are more possibilities behind them! Also thank you for the FAR pieces those and the graffities make this set really specail! - Tyberius
×