Yeah this won't help limiting that kind of imagery anyway, seeing as most of it happens on closed networks and the darknet or whatever.
I was talking more about the opt-out default internet filters that were proposed a few months back, to apparently stop kids from finding porn and such.
First of all why should the Government decide on what adults legally look at on the internet?
Secondly all of these filters already exist, it's just the case that parents have to ask their ISP to set it up themselves. Why can't we just stick with this as opposed to blanket blocking everything inappropriate down to whatever the Government determines what is wrong and doesn't want the public to see?
I can't help but think that this is all just laying down the keystones for widespread internet censorship but first targeted towards the kind of material nobody wants to stand up for, which is perfectly legal pornography might I add.
This is the problem when a populist politician such as Cameron can piggyback off the fears of the vocal minority and still remain neutral to the general public, as many people in the UK are far too apathetic.