Jump to content
huzman

[Decision] SC4, Skylines, SC2013, in order

SC4, Skylines, SC2013, in order  

82 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Should the SC4 Forums be moved on the main Forums Index?

    • SC4 Forums should be moved to the top above CSL.
      49
    • SC4 Forums should be moved to just below CSL.
      21
    • SC4 Forums should stay right where they are.
      12

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 11/09/2017 at 07:09 AM

32 posts in this topic Last Reply

Highlighted Posts

Re-arranging the order of appearance.

@Tarkus mentioned in the Folders Discussion " Also, consider the absurdity of wanting to make the SC4 community more like the SC2013 community (which is basically dead, and has been for a couple years now)."

It's high time to reorder the appearance of the different forums: it should be 1st., SC4, 2nd., Skylines and 3rd., SC2013, me thinks.
After all, SC4 is the main forum, all others, and I mean ALL, come second by along shot.
Why, just convenience in surfing around. I for one, I never go to SC2013, and just once to Skylines. So it's a bit of a drag to scroll down, and down, and... just to get to where I want to go.

In fact, from my experience, SC3000 should be promoted to second place, but that's my personal preferences. Anyway this rant should give an idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa, @Tarkus! That is an extremely detailed analysis. Thanks. *:thumb:

@huzman How would you feel about making this a poll? And if so, maybe have these three choices:

  • SC4 Forums should be moved to the top above CSL.
  • SC4 Forums should be moved to just under CSL.
  • SC4 Forums should stay right where they are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • 3 hours ago, CorinaMarie said:

    Whoa, @Tarkus! That is an extremely detailed analysis. Thanks. *:thumb:

    @huzman How would you feel about making this a poll? And if so, maybe have these three choices:

    @CorinaMarie took the words out my mouth. Making a Poll? I'm all for it. Maybe expanding it a little bit? Like, where do folks go to? What's the first thread of a given forum. Or maybe that's complicating  things. One thing tho: I ain't smart enough to know to make them poll things. But be my guest.

    @Tarkus That's a great insight about who is who. Thanks a lot.

    @Haljackey Well, what about that. That's pretty good trick.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    6 minutes ago, huzman said:

    But be my guest.

    I've added a poll and I've set the votes to be anonymous.

     

    7 minutes ago, huzman said:

    Maybe expanding it a little bit? Like, where do folks go to? What's the first thread of a given forum. Or maybe that's complicating  things.

    I believe that would complicate things. *;)

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    I think it made sense for the new games to be put at the top, but we've had enough time for each game to establish its own popularity, and it's clear that SC2013 is dead. I'm fine with either CSL or SC4 being at the top, but SC2013 imo should be moved down. 

    I would also be in favor of consolidating subforums within each game into a smaller number of logical subforums, in order to make each one more vibrant. 

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Like the books in my bookshelf, I think, order is good for orientation. Even if the mind - violated by school and education - often thinks all things have to be in order (even friends: very best friend, best friend, good friends, common friends) and so order becomes an instrument of discipline (law and order) - one shouldn't forget order is an instrument to help organisation, not to dictate organisation. There's no need to be afraid of chaos. The fear of chaos is some kind of occultism (chaos is associated with the devil).

    About how to order/sort things it's still Aristotle's logic (chapter about definitions: genus, species and difference) the best reading to get a quick instruction. Imho.

    So first question would be - why you need to sort things on the forum starting page.

    Me, being a member since 2009, I don't need an order - I'll find my stuff anyway. Also with the many new functions to filter content - which isn't much else than giving things an order by individual criteria - the visible order on the forum's start page seems not really functional to me. Once it had a function - but with time passing it became functionally obsolete as I don't access the forums most of the time via the overview but f.e. by listing the last activities.

    But ...

    ... it seems the front page of the forums is something like the shelf in a supermarket. So the question is: how should this shelf look like. It may be important for people first time visting like for their eyes wandering along the goods shelf.

    And so the questions seems to be - where to place the products so they catch peoples eyes. To attract them.

    Well it is plausible to always place your newest product on top. You won't place your best seller on top - because it sells already it doesn't need the extra advertising instead you would like to promote the new stuff by placing it quite in front of the customers eyes. So you would use the front page not for function (the functions are somewhere else) but to attract people. Also mostly it works this way - you place your newest product on top - because it is the most prominent. There are reviews in the journals and much discussion outside in the world and spots on TV - so there is a global interest for the newest product in media, it's the news itself - while on the older products there is rarely a 'hype' simply because everybody knows. So you would use this 'hype' about new products to attract people to your shop.

    Doesn't matter which product the consumers buys in your shop - important is, you get him into your shop. That's why you would put your newest product on top - not to promote this product but to promote your shop. Look: we have even the brand new xxx in stock.

    I doubt you can attract people to the simtropolis forums best with SC4. Because of this. Maybe they become interested when they are inside the shop. But first you have to attract them to the shop itself. And you would do this with something actual, not old. You attract people with the brand new sewing machne, then the client asks, can I do this and that - and then on second step, you'd say, no, but I have this other model, a little older and not so shiny, that can do. There is no need to sell the product you advertise.

    But now - Simtropolis doesn't advertise and sell products itself. Simtropolis doesn't take part in the market and doesn't make up the market but can only reflect the market - reflect what is playing in the gallery, the hype in media etc.. SC4 isn't much present in media. So to put it top on shelf imho would be a mistake ignoring the situation outside.   

    My five cents.

     

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    18 minutes ago, RandyE said:

    I can discuss the issues with SC 2013 elsewhere. 

    :ohyes:

    It's a little bit disappointing, I guess, if you come here to get support for an issue with sc2013 and there's almost nobody who can give this support. Imho even community's technical support for sc3000 is better.

    So the question maybe wrong - the question isn't where to put sc4, the question is where to put SC2013. It's nothing to see it like a race - who's doing better - it's just to be serious and not to promote forums almost dead and to not disappoint people seeking for help.

    Shure it would be best if there were many successfull city builders and there were plenty of topics. It's really nothing of 'win' and 'loose' as to loose a game because being insufficient isn't success, it's something sad. But doesn't help - if community can't give support we shouldn't fake there is support. Maybe this is the crucial point about the discussion. It's not about being more or less successfull games.

    As we, hopefully, don't care for success but for the fun playing and therefore supporting the fun of the players, not the success of the games.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Regarding my personal take on the ordering, I'm okay with either SC4 or C:S being at the top.  Statistically, they're fairly close, and I think a strong case can be made either way.  SC2013, however, is in third place, and a very considerable distance behind the first two.

    The one very interesting thing that caught my eye with the stats, particularly on the C:S side, is that the General Discussion board for that game lags considerably behind the corresponding CJ and modding boards in activity.  Looking at those proportions, it would appear that ST actually has a role in the C:S world that is at least somewhat analogous to the one SC4 Devotion plays in the SC4 community.  The SC4 crowd here seems to have a higher percentage of casual players, as evidenced by the General Discussion breakdown there.

    -Tarkus

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    On 11/2/2017 at 1:09 PM, huzmansaid:

    Re-arranging the order of appearance.

    @Tarkus mentioned in the Folders Discussion " Also, consider the absurdity of wanting to make the SC4 community more like the SC2013 community (which is basically dead, and has been for a couple years now)."

    It's high time to reorder the appearance of the different forums: it should be 1st., SC4, 2nd., Skylines and 3rd., SC2013, me thinks.
    After all, SC4 is the main forum, all others, and I mean ALL, come second by along shot.
    Why, just convenience in surfing around. I for one, I never go to SC2013, and just once to Skylines. So it's a bit of a drag to scroll down, and down, and... just to get to where I want to go.

    In fact, from my experience, SC3000 should be promoted to second place, but that's my personal preferences. Anyway this rant should give an idea.

    That's reply of my post of Folder Discussion. In the topic, I think we should increase the competitiveness of network modding and stopping the NAM monopoly. But, I don't have intention to hate or even stop the NAM. But, you're deciding my topic to be agreed on, so agree or denying or silent is fine.

    I think, SC4 is above the C:S, although is last minute I voted below the C:S. This is due to the activity of SC4 community. Compared to other city-building games here, SC4 is more active than C:S as @Tarkus said.

    Thanks.

     

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    5 hours ago, Chief ZDN said:

    I think we should increase the competitiveness of network modding and stopping the NAM monopoly.

    Monopoly? Seriously?

    You misunderstand, we don't control the RUL codebase, we maintain it for the benefit of the entire community. Want to contribute, no problem, anyone can add their code. For example, look at this little mod, which couldn't work sans NAM code:

    So we added the code so it could work.

    Similarly the controller compiler allows for users to add code into the NAM, you could technically use it to create a custom set of RUL code not linked to the NAM. Whilst competing sets of code could be made, for almost every usage scenario, a single code-base which everyone can contribute towards makes a lot more sense. It prevents conflicts and ensures everything is interoperable together. Compare that to C:S modding where lots of mods won't work if you've other mods installed, it's much simpler for all if you ask me. We're not trying to be the overlords of RUL code, but by taking responsibility for it, I think a great service has been provided for all.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    If you ask to me, SC4 should be at the very top...

    ...although I know that this is not the general "mentality" of ST, which is meant to be a catch-all site for all city-building simulation fans no matter what game they play. We all jumped hard on the SC2013 and C:S bandwagons at the time and the first bandwagon, which was noisy and chaotic at the beginning, is now empty and abandoned, while the second one keeps quite healthy. At some point, the C:S player base (and Paradox) will move on to other games, as it happens with any other games. I always believed that when the Reddit and Steam forums go progessively quiet, the hardcore fans will find their small place to meet at ST. Then, keeping C:S at the very top still makes some sense in order to "catch" those players seeking for an alternative to Reddit. 

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • 3 hours ago, rsc204 said:

    Monopoly? Seriously?

    I think this a non-issue. In fact, it shows a lack of understanding the issues and jumping to wrong conclusions.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    7 hours ago, rsc204 said:

    Monopoly? Seriously?

    You misunderstand, we don't control the RUL codebase, we maintain it for the benefit of the entire community. Want to contribute, no problem, anyone can add their code. For example, look at this little mod, which couldn't work sans NAM code:

    So we added the code so it could work.

    Similarly the controller compiler allows for users to add code into the NAM, you could technically use it to create a custom set of RUL code not linked to the NAM. Whilst competing sets of code could be made, for almost every usage scenario, a single code-base which everyone can contribute towards makes a lot more sense. It prevents conflicts and ensures everything is interoperable together. Compare that to C:S modding where lots of mods won't work if you've other mods installed, it's much simpler for all if you ask me. We're not trying to be the overlords of RUL code, but by taking responsibility for it, I think a great service has been provided for all.

    Thanks for info. Sorry if I misunderstood.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • 8 hours ago, CorinaMarie said:

    (If I didn't know better, I'd say this topic is starting to go off topic.)

    I agree. Although some people are making a point about the NAM, those points should on the NAM thread(s) or at least in a new topic.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • On 11/6/2017 at 6:11 AM, CorinaMarie said:

    It will end one week from the start of the topic which will be this coming Thursday at 2:09 AM EST.

    "So the polls have closed. The votes have been counted. And now, may we have the results?" (Some unknown politician in a dark and unknown country)

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    If we round off the numbers and factor them down, then add a total sample value then this is how the outcome of the poll looks to me.  The poll is a political structure, not a scientific one, but we could consider the total sample similar to the control group in science research.

    It is unknown how many would have voted 'none of the above' or 'other'.   There were 1,051 views of the page.  We can add that number of people who did not vote meaning either they were not members, they would have voted 'Other' , there are many multiple views by the same person, or they do not care either way. 

    To keep this post brief I haven't shown the math done but below are the results of my processing:

    Out of 113 votes/votes by default of no vote

    Effectively, there are 3 candidates in the election so we can just number them 1 to 3.

    1)    5 voted to put SC4 at the top   4.2%
    2)    2 voted to put SC4 below C:S.  1.8%
    3)    106 voted for either no change or some other change.  94%

    In pure direct democracy of 50% + 1 candidate 3 wins by a massive landslide.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    5 hours ago, huzman said:

    "So the polls have closed. The votes have been counted. And now, may we have the results?" (Some unknown politician in a dark and unknown country)

    It is (and has been) in discussion among the admins and Dirk. We'll let you know once a decision is reached. Please do keep in mind a poll of this nature is advisory rather than being a referendum. *;)

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Well, yes. Politicians ask the people what they like to have. Then they make a conference. And then they send a spokesman who will tell what the people are going to get. So, f.e. people ask for more security on the streets. And politicians decide to have more wardens walking around. And what people will get are more parking tickets.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • 6 hours ago, CorinaMarie said:

    a poll of this nature is advisory rather than being a referendum.

    Yeah, that's the truth.

    6 hours ago, Fantozzi said:

    And what people will get are more parking tickets.

    Thank God I stopped driving.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an Account  

    Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  

    Register a New Account

    Sign In  

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now


    • Similar Content

      • By rivit
        I've taken the liberty of starting this topic because I have just posted a major upgrade to DataNode, and to date there has not been a single place where support questions could be posted. DataNode is the sort of tool that is actually very easy to use, but overwhelming for many because of the massive amount of data it presents. The Manual included with it is there for a reason - to make this use of this data easier to understand and put to your own ends.
        Its really an audit tool aimed at a couple of tasks as a player:
        Checking that the load order of mods in plugins leads to the result you want - a fast loading, clean SC4 plugins folder. Checking that you have the dependencies needed for a mod As a modder it can help in verifying that your mod is correct and clean, and works as you expect if it overrides game content.
        Latest Version of SC4DataNode
        DataNode has been around for a while (since 2012) , and from time to time gets a mention when people encounter bugs or discuss how they manage their plugins. Today I've released a new version v1.06 that is well worth getting especially if you have a large plugin folder. 
        After some forum discussion about what SC4Datanode shows of the files in the Plugins folder, I’ve decided to make all the files touched in the loading process visible. This slows the program a little bit but means it is now possible to see all files that SC4 ignores when loading those it recognises. These do no harm (generally) but slow the loading process as SC4 must look at every file to see if it is relevant.
        Here are the main changes:
        in the SC4 file view files that are coloured with a beige background and orange text, with zzz in the Dead column, are sleepers or zombies – they are examined by SC4 but only contribute to the time taken to start up the game. These are mostly documentation files – text and images - but may include all sorts of files included by authors of game material. You don’t have to remove these but if you do the game will start faster. By default, these go onto the scanning Log unless suppressed. In the Preferences panel one can suppress the logging (and display) of non-SC4 Files. This is useful if you have a lot of documentation files but want to leave them there and just concentrate on dependencies. If a file ends in .dat, .sav, .SC4, .SC4Desc, .SC4Lot, or .SC4Model, and the File is empty it will be flagged with an Apricot background, and Orange text. It will be put on the log as it may be damaged if it should be a SC4 file. But, for example, the uninst000.dat in SC4PLUGINS is a file that isn’t a real SC4 .dat. Occasionally installers leave .dll or .exe files in the Plugins – the ones in SimCity:Plugins and NAM are valid – others may just be installers for mods and can (should) be removed after installation. They are marked as IsOK in the Dead Column of the SC4 File display – just in case. SC4Datanode will now also show all files that could be loaded by SC4, LE or PIM-x even if they have no extensions or other wild names. These are treated as if they were SC4.Model files, that is, are loaded in phase 1 of the loading sequence. These should probably be renamed to have a .dat extension for easy identification in future but you’ll need to judge by its contents. When a path name becomes so long (more than 260 characters) that Windows refuses to handle it, SC4Datanode now shows you where it is and will stop running. At this point you will need to fix the problem by rearranging the folders so that the structure is not so deep. The CSV reports by view now produce one file per view – named according to the view – some reports have extra properties common to all items. The Q column has the value “=” when it is the only or final exemplar after overrides are accounted for. FileView and TGI views all produce a report. The program has had its Error Handling strengthened and should also run faster on x64 machines. Memory management has been a focus of testing. It is configured to adapt to x32 and x64 systems thus helping memory constraints if the plugins folder is very, very large. The Manual has been updated to reflect these changes. I recommend you (re)read the pages 10-15 to understand the new features.
         Memory and Performance
        During testing of this new version it became apparent that the old version would start to show memory problems on a large plugin set. This was due to the program being compiled for x32 machines. This program wades through a lot of data and uses up to 40% of the size of your plugins total during the scan. It has now been compiled to use x64 when on 64bit machines, and x86 on 32bit machines. Because pointers are double the size on x64 it will use about 50% more memory on x64 but have no ceiling other than physical memory (assuming no disk paging). On x32 the addressable memory is usually closer to 2GB. I have no idea if the Extended Flag works on .NET code - if so the limit may be 3.6GB. 
        So:
        on x32 – 2GB addressable implies a maximum plugin size of about 4GB before memory may start causing issues. on x64 – 4GB memory implies about 7GB max plugin size, 8GB memory about 14GB, and 16GB should not give problems until 28GB of plugins. The memory used is shown on the status bar. A lot of work has been done to minimize use of memory. However, if you do exceed physical memory it may start disk-memory paging and become very slow or even CTD in the worst case (out of program control).

        Performance is very dependent on disk speed – the best times have come from SSD, and 10,000 rpm iron disks. The program is I/O bound and will use only one processor for itself by design. The OS (under the carpet) then can use as many cores as it wants for I/O. .NET is quite efficient in I/O, so the program is quite snappy – obviously the age of machine, OS, disk type and size of plugins affect performance. 
        It is worth noting that if you run SC4Datanode directly after a reboot its run time may be quite a bit slower than subsequent rescans or scans. This is because Windows is filling its disk caches for the first time as it goes. These get used next time round leading to much faster loading times. This also holds for SC4. The more headroom in memory the more impressive this caching is. Also keep in mind that Windows can easily use 4GB (x64) on its own these days.  

        These restrictions hold even more for SC4 – if you feed it a plugin collection in excess of 4GB its going to be slower and slower starting up and may actually run into problems. Its always more pleasant and responsive to run SC4 with a subset of your plugin archives. SC4Datanode will allow you to manage a much larger plugin set than SC4 can comfortably run.
        Finally this version would not be solid as it is without the efforts of @twalsh102 who now holds the record for SC4DataNode with a Plugins folder size of 14.1 GB with 29,961 files which was eventually scanned and analysed in 2 minutes 53 seconds settling on 2.36 GB of memory. This was achieved on a 2018 Win10 machine with 16GB of memory. This is nearly twice as large and fast as the 2012 testing figures held by Doc Rorlach which were achieved on a Win7 machine of that time namely 7.34GB of plugins in 2m38s. 
         
        Please use this place to can ask/comment/suggest about DataNode. Like any program it can be improved.
      • By tariely
        TL-Nexis and DM Waterfront Parks and Promenade Modular Set
        I blame Nexis (mrbisonn) for this set. He sent me a nice model of an anchor and… I let it ran away and make babies with Don Miguel Waterfront Promenade lots. Here’s the result. Six parks, five of which work as waterfront pieces
        Content :
        TL-DM WTF Park Paths 
        TL-DM WTF Addons Paths
        That you can variously combine with :
        TL-DM WTF Large Promenade 11x4
        and its modular versions : 
        TL-DM WTF PromenadePark East
        TL-DM WTF PromenadePark Center 5x5
        TL-DM WTF PromenadePark West
        and with : TL-Nexis WTF Anchor Park 6x5
        and its fully waterfronty version (to be combined with the paths):
        TL-Nexis WTF Anchor Park 6x5 Open
        ________________
        The original Don Miguel sets are here : Waterfront Promenade and Waterfront Promenade Set 2
        And go have a look at both Nexis and Don Miguel’s Content, why don’t you ?
        _________________
        Many thanks to my technical gurus, Rsc204, Kosc and Dreadnought. And especially Rivit, who lighted my SC4world and is always generously ready to help. And the guys and gals on the forums (Twalsh, Tyberius06, Matias93, Fantozzi, Catty-cb, Corinamarie…). We need help when we begin peeking under the hood of SC4. That the community is always there for us noobies is very comforting.
        _______________
        Dependencies :
        TL-DM Waterfront Parks :
        BSC MegaProps CARCH vol.1
        BSC MegaProps MJB vol2
        BSC MegaProps Misc vol.1
        BSC MegaProps - SG vol.1
        JENXPARIS_Prop_Bridge_Light_Cone_R1.dat (in NAM 34 and up)
        PEG Texture Pack vol.1 (PEG_Overlay textures_vol.1.dat)
        PorkieProps-vol.1.dat
        Simfox 8 Chestnuts
        Simfox TreePack2
        SPOT_V-rc100.dat
        Tariel-Rivit’s Essentials (must load after the NAM)
        Tamorr_Family_Props_V210.dat
        Twrecks Maxis HD Tree Replacement
        ***Girafe trees always Necessary for Twrecks Maxis Trees HD replacement ***:
        Ashes - Beeches - Canary date Palms - Cypresses - Lindens - Rowans - VIP orange fagus Seasonal Flora
        VIP-OR_Fagus_Props.dat
        wmp_power_props01.dat, in WMP Power Lots.
        Girafe Trees : beeches, chestnuts, cypresses, elms, lindens, Norway maples, rowans,
        TL-Nexis Anchor Park : sames deps,  plus :
        NetworkAddonod_Props.dat (in NAM 34 & up)
        Nexis_BigAnchorA-0x5ad0e817_0x27f918cf_0x30000.SC4Model (included)
        TL-Nexis_BigAnchorA-0x6534284a-0xd71a70d1-0x991945f6.SC4Desc (included)
        SM2 Roundabout Tiles_Tex.dat, in SM2 Roundabout Sculptures Set
        and Moar Girafe Trees : birches, common spruces, conifers !
        Same deps for all the the paths.
        ___________________
        General warnings :
        (1) This is for SC4 Rush Hour.
        (2) I play with NAM36, RRW-EU selection (it shouldn’t interfere here, but you never know !)
        (3) I also play with Twrecks Maxis HD Tree Replacement (if you don’t use it, your trees might look a bit different [not these trees !] ; perhaps you should use it…)
         (4) I play Nights. Depending on your using or not a Light Replacement Mod, the lighting will be slightly different, but There Will Be Light. If you dont want it, you can either tweak my lights in the Lot Editor or take them out of my Essentials  folder dep.
        (5) I like trees. I make intensive use of trees. Especially Girafe tree collection on the LEX ; so here’s the link, once for all ; just follow it into the woods, when indicated.
    • Recently Browsing   0 members

      No registered users viewing this page.

    ×

    Thank You for the Continued Support!

    Simtropolis relies mainly on member donations to continue operating. Without your support, we just would not be able to be entering our 15th year online!  You've really help make this a great community.

    But we still need your support to stay online. If you're able to, please consider a donation to help us stay up and running, so that we can help keep bringing SimCity players together to share our creations.

    Make a Donation, Get a Gift!

    Expand your city with the best from the Simtropolis Echange.
    Make a donation and get one or all three discs today!

    stexcollection-header.png

    By way of a "Thank You" gift, we'd like to send you our STEX Collector's DVD. It's some of the best buildings, lots, maps and mods collected for you over the years. Check out the STEX Collections for more info.

    Each donation helps keep Simtropolis online, open and free!

    Thank you for reading and enjoy the site!

    More About STEX Collections