Jump to content

762 posts in this topic Last Reply

Highlighted Posts

Posted:
Last Online:  
 

The Buckingham Palace <ahttp://www.mapsofworld.com/travel-destinations/images/buckingham-palace.jpg> It's a boring building that looks exactly like every other official building built at that time (The Reichstag in Berlin, The Winter Palace, St. Petersburg) It's just so grey and dull. Also, it's a complete rip off Baroque and ancient Greek architecture. If it wasn't for the fact that the Royal family lives there it should be torn down immediately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

You thought those were ugly...look @ these...

660331196aa8d6cacc5jc6.jpg

Can't remember were that one is

kaliningradew8.jpg

Kaliningrad Former U.S.S.R

uglydiamondbuildingbroodl9.jpg

Ugly Diamond Building- Brooklyn NY, USA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

I have to agree, those Scottish ones are truly vile. What is that wood doing on the windows???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

dont know if anyone has said this but

The Chicago Spire 
chicagospiretwo.jpg

i love Chicago, But Wth is up with that building

800px-Chicago_Spire.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

yes its wood over the windows

we Scots have a government which only hires the worst and most stoned architects in the world

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

Chicago Spire is not the worst building. I don't know how anyone could say that...


Gsig.jpg

"With a purposeful grimace and a terrible sound he pulls the spitting high-tension wires down..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

modern architecture isn't bad unless they try to get too "ground breaking" and end up presenting us with a glass cow udder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

Originally posted by: super_monkey

You thought those were ugly...look @ these...

660331196aa8d6cacc5jc6.jpg

Can't remember were that one is

quote>
 

This building is in Milan, Italy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

The Chicago Spire just dosent Fit in With the Surronding Landscape, it also like a Glass Screw, im not calling it the worst, but Far , and i mean almost directly South Of the Best

Then again if a gaint alian was attacking the city, The Spire would be like that annoying Pen Sticking Upfrom The Floor, When it tried to steep down

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

Chicago is a city founded on molding the old with new! Not only did they introduce the first modern skyscrapers which at the time were rubbing shoulders with brick walk ups less than 6 stories tall. Look how far we've come. Now we have the chance for a modern glass building to rub shoulders with brick highrises and other beautifully designed skyscrapers. The Chicago Spire is truly revloutionary! Building's like this are what make Chicago so unique! Blending old with new, different ways of planning and thinking. I love it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

the thing is, the spire doesn't fit now, but 5-10 years from now, there will be more like it, and it will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

well thats true. but its a lot better than the vacant lot that used to be there. plus theres always one building that has to set the trend for those to follow. i also admire the trump tower that they're building downtown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

God damn that Chicago Spire looks so fake that it has to be real. I never thought the Egg building in Europe would be topped. This is my first hearing of it, when was it erected? Never mind just Wiki'd it haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

well it hasnt been built yet...thats why it looks so fake is because its just a model. its supposed to be finished by 2010.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

i hate to be a hometowner, but of ones i've seen in real life...

oregon.jpg

exactly what it looks like in real life. it's "acclaimed" for its architecture round here, but i hate it. way too much steel, i drive by it everyday.

i'd also like to say that i personal like corbusier's architecture and his forward thinking. call me crazy, but i think he had some pretty interesting ideas and thoughts. i liked his building on the harvard campus. the concrete is a no-no, but the grassy surroundings inspire me to do so in my cities as well 9.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

I guess nobody had posted photos from Taiwan except the 101 (I actually think its ok.)

Now these are weird:

167815028_1b125a84b7.jpg

Located on the northern shore between Keelung and Tamshui. I wonder why nobody lives there?

Now it looks even worse with the dilapidation since nobody bothered to knock them down.

Everytime I pass it it's an eyesore...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

Although I don't have a picture of it, the Ohio Defense Contractors headquarters is pretty ugly.  Noisy area too, I know since I lived across the street from it for a few years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

Taipei 101. What an absolutely hideous building, deterred by looking far too isolated.


SC 4 + CS 1.6 = :]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

Comcast%20Center.jpg

My Bid goes for the Comcast Center in my hometown of Philadelphia , Which I wish would build a 1000ft building soon. This building is basically a box with sharp edges. and it is protruding out  to the sides . I mean There is no Spire !!!  I want a Spire like the Liberty One Place. And my dad who helped build Liberty Place One said that it's a nice building. But they should have came up with something abit better to dominate the skyline. It's just odd. And also here is another from Philadelphia.

cira_centre_FULL.jpg

What was this Architect thinking!!! The top is larger than the bottom. A fundimental rule in buildings is that the top should never be larger than the bottom . Also the building has 5 sides. It's a virtually a smashed up polygon . Only thing I like about it is that there are lights on it which can change color and at night it looks mystifying but still it is ugly during the day.


Pick English for the CJ Forum Edition | Pick Sierrastarin for the CJ Section of the Site

the new kingdom of SIERRASTARE | La SIERRASTARINTA Del Zonta Newe

UPDATED: December 28 2011 | UPDÀTÉ: 28 de Decémbre 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

I know I'm going to be out by myself on this one, but I think the worst building in the world is Falling Water, a house in Pennsylvania by Frank Lloyd Wright. It's not a terrible building and has its fine points, but for the sheer amount of hype it gets that completely overlook its shortcomings (massive concrete walls detracting from the scenery, incredibly low ceilings and narrow hallways, etc.), it gets to the top of my terrible architecture list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

are you kidding? that's an amazing house. i can't believe anyone could not like that.

frank lloyd wright was a true american genius... not that many of em 3.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

I'm probably going to get hate mail for this, but I never thought the WTC Twin Towers were that good looking, they were just tall. I thought they had no creativity in them, they were giant concrete blocks...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

Originally posted by: Chicago|Chris I'm probably going to get hate mail for this, but I never thought the WTC Twin Towers were that good looking, they were just tall. I thought they had no creativity in them, they were giant concrete blocks...quote>

A lot of people hated those buildings for a long time after they were built. They were pretty ugly, when you think about it. Two big shiny metal things with itty bitty windows. It just took a while to grow on everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 
Originally posted by: Chicago|Chris I'm probably going to get hate mail for this, but I never thought the WTC Twin Towers were that good looking, they were just tall. I thought they had no creativity in them, they were giant concrete blocks...quote>
Please define creativity, Chris.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

Shingure:  This building (Comcast Center) is basically a box with sharp edges. and it is protruding out  to the sides . I mean There is no Spire !!!  I want a Spire like the Liberty One Place. And my dad who helped build Liberty Place One said that it's a nice building. But they should have came up with something abit better to dominate the skyline. 

(Cira Center) What was this Architect thinking!!! The top is larger than the bottom. A fundimental rule in buildings is that the top should never be larger than the bottom . Also the building has 5 sides. It's a virtually a smashed up polygon . Only thing I like about it is that there are lights on it which can change color and at night it looks mystifying but still it is ugly during the day.quote>

*Sigh* As a fellow Philadelphian, and as an architect, lemmie throw in my two cents.  99.9% of the builidngs on this planet are some variation of a box, and thats because boxes work so well, with human's understandings of scale and space, not to mention most of the furniture we have is also geometric in nature and intended for straight walls.  You cannot critisize Comcast because its a box, you look follish doing so, especially because Liberty Place is also a box.  Look up the floorplans and try to argue.

In fact, what is great about the Comcast building is that it IS different.  Philadelphia prides itself in its spires; its true, we love them, we light them up, we EXPECT them.  The archtiect knew this, for sure, and wanted to do something different; can we blame them?  If anything, the archtiect ABSTRACTED the spire, simplified it, and even made it stunning with a simple reveal that punches powerfully into the crown of the building.  Very subtle but none the less imposing and dominating.  The night lighting for this builidng is also intriguing, lighting up the corner reveals at the spandrel glass.  The lighting is much better than Cira anyway: a bunch of lazy LED's that turn it into a Vegas wannabe.

Speaking of Cira, who says a building has to be skinnier as you go up?  What rule where??Welcome to the 21st century:  technology can do amazing things.  you'd definitely hate anything Rem Koolhaas has drawn up.  Bottom line, there is mroe to architecture than what it looks like.  The materials, the connections, the concept, it all has to add up.  Its not all about form.

ok, im finished with this soapbox

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
 

Originally posted by: xxbydesign
Shingure:  This building (Comcast Center) is basically a box with sharp edges. and it is protruding out  to the sides . I mean There is no Spire !!!  I want a Spire like the Liberty One Place. And my dad who helped build Liberty Place One said that it's a nice building. But they should have came up with something abit better to dominate the skyline. 

(Cira Center) What was this Architect thinking!!! The top is larger than the bottom. A fundimental rule in buildings is that the top should never be larger than the bottom . Also the building has 5 sides. It's a virtually a smashed up polygon . Only thing I like about it is that there are lights on it which can change color and at night it looks mystifying but still it is ugly during the day.quote>

*Sigh* As a fellow Philadelphian, and as an architect, lemmie throw in my two cents.  99.9% of the builidngs on this planet are some variation of a box, and thats because boxes work so well, with human's understandings of scale and space, not to mention most of the furniture we have is also geometric in nature and intended for straight walls.  You cannot critisize Comcast because its a box, you look follish doing so, especially because Liberty Place is also a box.  Look up the floorplans and try to argue.

In fact, what is great about the Comcast building is that it IS different.  Philadelphia prides itself in its spires; its true, we love them, we light them up, we EXPECT them.  The archtiect knew this, for sure, and wanted to do something different; can we blame them?  If anything, the archtiect ABSTRACTED the spire, simplified it, and even made it stunning with a simple reveal that punches powerfully into the crown of the building.  Very subtle but none the less imposing and dominating.  The night lighting for this builidng is also intriguing, lighting up the corner reveals at the spandrel glass.  The lighting is much better than Cira anyway: a bunch of lazy LED's that turn it into a Vegas wannabe.

Speaking of Cira, who says a building has to be skinnier as you go up?  What rule where??Welcome to the 21st century:  technology can do amazing things.  you'd definitely hate anything Rem Koolhaas has drawn up.  Bottom line, there is mroe to architecture than what it looks like.  The materials, the connections, the concept, it all has to add up.  Its not all about form.

ok, im finished with this soapboxquote>

 

All and all,  it's about design elements that will fit in this over zealous society.  WTC was considered very futuristic and radical for the 1970's design of skyskrapers.  The Chicago-Spire  ( which i can see the sight from my condo )  may be bit of an eyesore for a while, and the tourism will be in super-demand to see it.  "I'll need to find a new home" LOL.  

Great to see you stick up for your own city xxbydesign.  It shows PRIDE.  

Right now....physics say building's can't be wider at the top.  "For now that is"  the 21st century is NOW... not the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign In or register to comment...

To comment in reply, you must be a community member

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  

Register a New Account


×

Thank You for the Continued Support!

Simtropolis depends on donations to fund site maintenance costs.
Without your support, we just would not be in our 24th year online!  You really help make this a great community. *:thumb:

But we still need your support to stay online. If you're able to, please consider a donation to help us stay up and running. This helps sustain a platform where we can share our community creations for years to come.

Make a Donation, Get a Gift!

Expand your city with the best from the Simtropolis Exchange.
Make a Donation and get one or all three discs today!

STEX Collections

By way of a "Thank You" gift, we'd like to send you our STEX Collector's DVD. It's some of the best buildings, lots, maps and mods collected for you over the years. Check out the STEX Collections for more info.

Each donation helps keep Simtropolis online, open and free!

Thank you for reading and enjoy the site!

More About STEX Collections