Jump to content
Sign In to follow this  
belfastuniguy

American 2008 Election

How are you voting this Presidential Election  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. How are you voting this Presidential Election



1,790 posts in this topic Last Reply

Highlighted Posts

Posted:
Last Online:  
 

Originally posted by: Duke87 .

Somehow I'd think that if he wins in November (if not before then), there will no doubt be an attempt to challenge of his eligibility in court.... though that may just be the cynic in me talking.quote>



That doesn't sound like something that would work. Remember, the Republicans still contol the courts, they aren't likely to bar one of their own from the presidency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

Who changed the title to Obama Cannot be President. Thats just kind of immature.

o nevermind, my bad. Anyway, McCain should be okay since the Panama Canal was owned and operated by the US back then, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted:
Last Online:  
 

We'll see how Indiana and North Carolina vote. Hillary doesn't seem to be making the 70% margin that it was said she needed to win in every remaining contest (Pennsylvania was one of the "remaining contests").


General Rules|Chat Rules

"Adherence to one's principles should not prevent satisfaction of those same principles."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    The pressing question, though, is whether being born in a US territory counts or whether it needs to be one of the 50 (or however many there were when you were born) states. The Panama Canal Zone never was a state, though it was a US territory from 1903 to 1979, meaning McCain would have been born on what was at the time US soil even if it isn't anymore.

    Somehow I'd think that if he wins in November (if not before then), there will no doubt be an attempt to challenge of his eligibility in court.... though that may just be the cynic in me talking.quote>

    Oh that's interesting...

    Are the American media making much of this?? Or are they still not giving him much air time?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    It seems to really be an interesting non-issue. Most of us are familiar with automatic birthright citizenship to those born within the U.S. and its territories (even in some cases when the parents are not U.S. citizens), as that is how most of us have our citizenship. Less familiar, but fully legitmate, is automatic birthright citizenship to children when the parents are both U.S. citizens, even if those children are born outside U.S. territories. The complications arise when paternity is disputed or if one of the parents is not a U.S. citizen, dragging in legalese and politics-of-the-moment or feeding into the prejudices of the day, but none of that plays into McCain's case, as both his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.

    The other usual form of citizenship is through "naturalization," which is the long-term process by which non-U.S. citizens apply for and eventually earn U.S. citizenship. The fees, requirements, and procedural system are set out by law given the politics-of-the-day (ie, English proficiency, U.S. political education, desireable skills, racial or regional quotas, wealth, etc.) Naturalized citizens cannot become President, as they obviously did not receive their citizenship automatically by birth. Unlike Schwarzenegger, McCain was never naturalized through this process.

    When it comes to non-birthright citizenship by law, the government can generally establish whatever conditions it chooses, even simple decree or statute. The best example is the outcome of the Mexican-American War, in which Mexican citizens inhabiting Mexico's northern territories were simply declared U.S. citizens by law after America invaded and forcibly annexed those lands. Incidently, U.S. racial law at the time limited citizenship only to whites, leading the courts to deem that as the government recognizes such Mexican-Americans as citizens, it must also mean that Mexican-Americans must be recognized and classified as whites. Of course, such color-blinding never happened on the ground as racism remained the norm, but for legal purposes, those citizens whom today we would call Latino, Chicano, or Hispanic were technically considered "white."

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: belfastuniguy

    Oh that's interesting...

    Are the American media making much of this?? Or are they still not giving him much air time?quote>

    No, it's not commonly mentioned.  Many people still don't know about it.

    As far as I know, there are only two kinds of citizens:  "natural born" and "naturalized".  As Odainsaker pointed out, McCain was never naturalized since no one saw any need for it.   When US military personnel have children overseas, the children are generally considered to have dual citizenship, depending on the country.

    I don't see how a court challenge could be successful but it could have ramifications for other children of US military personnel born overseas.  Since no one wants to deal with that issue, I wouldn't be surprised if this never got to court.   People would rather stick their heads in the sand.


    We can inspire others through witness so that one grows together in communicating. But the worst thing of all is religious proselytism, which paralyzes: “I am talking with you in order to persuade you.” No. Each person dialogues, starting with his and her own identity. The church grows by attraction, not proselytizing.    - Pope Francis

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: belfastuniguy
    this whole stinking country of a place needs a good smack in the facequote>

    Couldn't agree with you more.

    I'm somewhat concerned by the whole religion thing in American politics. Why is it some important? You elected a deeply religious person last time and look at the bloody mess he's leaving.

    I personally think politics works better without religion and I think America needs to learn this and not just vote for people that preach about God and pray constantly. Just because you like their faith does not in any way make them a better Presidential candidate. Having religion in politics is never good and will always influence decisions and policies.quote>

     

    I wouldn't say George Bush is very religious, oh sure he said Jesus was his hero, and he pandered to the evagelicals....But once he got in office you didn't hear about his faith again until 04 when he was up for re-election.  Now for the past 4 years again his faith is absent.  He even went so far as to call the Constittution "a God-dammed piece of paper".  As a Christian, I consider the evangelicals my brothers and sisters, but it is sad how they were bamboozeled by Beezulbuub(sp?)... Bush... Yes I voted for him too,  but not because of his so called Christianity, but rather I voted along party lines.

    By the way... It is a well known fact that Bush and your former PM Blair are both satanists.  Call me a crack pot,  but both of them, along with a whole bunch of other world leaders go around giving the devil horn sign just a little too much for my comfort level.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    By the way... It is a well known fact that Bush and your former PM Blair are both satanists.  Call me a crack pot,  but both of them, along with a whole bunch of other world leaders go around giving the devil horn sign just a little too much for my comfort level.quote>

    ...indeed. 34.gif

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: CrazyFinger

    By the way... It is a well known fact that Bush and your former PM Blair are both satanists.  Call me a crack pot,  but both of them, along with a whole bunch of other world leaders go around giving the devil horn sign just a little too much for my comfort level.quote>

    OK, just so everyone knows (not that I'm trying to ease Bush's public image) but the devil horn salute you're talking about means something entirely different to Bush.  Bush is from Texas, and while this is rather misunderstood outside of Texas, inside the state, the devil horn salute is universally known as the "Hook Em Horns" sign because it is the hand sign of the University of Texas.  Last I remember him making that sign was after UT won the national title and their band marched in the inaugural parade.

    Then there's the whole "rock on" part, but I don't need to explain that. 3.gif

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    No! Don't destroy my delusion! Everybody knows that they drink the blood of children in the White House bowling alley every Thursday evening!

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: Micah ... not until June.quote>
     

    Maybe not officially until June, but its over....Hillary has no shot. She is even starting to see some of her committed superdelegates switch sides today. She needs to leave on a positive like winning the next couple of primaries, but it is no matter....the math doesn't work for her in any scenerio even with the inclusion of Michigan and Florida.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: CrazyFinger

     He even went so far as to call the Constittution "a God-dammed piece of paper". 

    quote>

    Guess he forgot about that part of his oath where he swore to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States".

    There isn't a whole lot else in that oath.


    We can inspire others through witness so that one grows together in communicating. But the worst thing of all is religious proselytism, which paralyzes: “I am talking with you in order to persuade you.” No. Each person dialogues, starting with his and her own identity. The church grows by attraction, not proselytizing.    - Pope Francis

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    I wouldn't say George Bush is very religiousquote>

    Really??

    oh sure he said Jesus was his hero, and he pandered to the evagelicals....But once he got in office you didn't hear about his faith again until 04 when he was up for re-electionquote>

    Well if true, the fact that some people knew that and still voted for him is the perfect example if naiveness and blind stupidity of some of the American electorate. (note the word some)

    Now for the past 4 years again his faith is absentquote>

    His stance on pro-life and stem cell research shows a somewhat different picture. Maybe he is still pandering...though no election to fight...strange that

    By the way... It is a well known fact that Bush and your former PM Blair are both satanists. Call me a crack pot, but both of them, along with a whole bunch of other world leaders go around giving the devil horn sign just a little too much for my comfort level.quote>

    Won't even bother with that one..

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    I believe Hillary is done for, hasn't she canceled all her TV appearances and run out of funds?

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    I finally found the video I mentioned a long-time ago regarding Fox News. Was during the 2004 Presidential election, but still funny... 4.gif


    Click here  4.gif

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online: A long, long time ago... 
     

    Originally posted by: CrazyFinger
    Originally posted by: belfastuniguy
    He even went so far as to call the Constittution "a God-dammed piece of paper".  quote>

    Please provide a substantial link to provide proof of this attempt at libel....

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: Bodhi83

    Originally posted by: belfastuniguy

     He even went so far as to call the Constittution "a God-dammed piece of paper".  quote>

    Please provide a substantial link to provide proof of this attempt at libel....quote>

    Pick a link.  Any link.


    We can inspire others through witness so that one grows together in communicating. But the worst thing of all is religious proselytism, which paralyzes: “I am talking with you in order to persuade you.” No. Each person dialogues, starting with his and her own identity. The church grows by attraction, not proselytizing.    - Pope Francis

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: Bodhi83

    Originally posted by: belfastuniguy

     He even went so far as to call the Constittution "a God-dammed piece of paper".  quote>

    Please provide a substantial link to provide proof of this attempt at libel....quote>

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
  • Original Poster
  • Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    I didn't actually make that reference about the constitution, that was crazyfinger. 4.gif

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: belfastuniguy I didn't actually make that reference about the constitution, that was crazyfinger. 4.gifquote>

    Nobody said you did, the quoting was just misdone. Look at how the quotes are nested:

    (quote CrazyFinger)

        (quote belfastuniguy)

              (quote anonymous) {the comment}

              (close quote anonymous)

        {request for citation}

        {post editied info}

    Note that the first two quotes are left unclosed (hence why they contain the post edited info and would contain his signature if he had one). That post looks like it's just him quoting CrazyFinger quoting you requesting a citation quoting the comment. So what looks like this:

    Originally posted by: Bodhi83
    Originally posted by: CrazyFinger
    Originally posted by: belfastuniguy
    He even went so far as to call the Constittution "a God-dammed piece of paper".  quote>

    Please provide a substantial link to provide proof of this attempt at libel....

    Edited: 05/08/2008 at 12:52 AM by Bodhi83

    quote>

    quote>
    quote>

    should look like this, if it was done properly:

    Originally posted by: Bodhi83
    Originally posted by: CrazyFinger He even went so far as to call the Constittution "a God-dammed piece of paper".  quote>

    Please provide a substantial link to provide proof of this attempt at libel....

    Edited: 05/08/2008 at 12:52 AM by Bodhi83

    quote>

    There were just a couple extra quote headers in there for some reason.


    If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.
    If you can read this, you deserve a cookie.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: Voar Tok
    Originally posted by: CrazyFinger

    By the way... It is a well known fact that Bush and your former PM Blair are both satanists.  Call me a crack pot,  but both of them, along with a whole bunch of other world leaders go around giving the devil horn sign just a little too much for my comfort level.quote>

    OK, just so everyone knows (not that I'm trying to ease Bush's public image) but the devil horn salute you're talking about means something entirely different to Bush.  Bush is from Texas, and while this is rather misunderstood outside of Texas, inside the state, the devil horn salute is universally known as the "Hook Em Horns" sign because it is the hand sign of the University of Texas.  Last I remember him making that sign was after UT won the national title and their band marched in the inaugural parade.

    Then there's the whole "rock on" part, but I don't need to explain that. 3.gifquote>

     

    I guess all these people are UT fans too, huh?  And by the way, UT would  not accept Bush... Thats why he went to Yale.

    210105sign10mz0.jpg

    Italian Prime Ministers routing for UT... Go Longhorns!!! OK

    edwardsdevilhandiw7.jpg

    John Edwards really getting into that UT football game isnt he?

    tomridgedevilhandkz4.jpg

    Here's Tom Ridge getting all up in arms over that gool ole school UT.

    210105sign5pn1.jpg

    Bill Clinton, Yassar Arafat, Liz Taylor.... All UT fans.  Go Longhorns.

    Bush is a Satanist, along with the rest of the World's Governmental, Cultural and Religious elite... 

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Bush is a Satanist, along with the rest of the World's Governmental, Cultural and Religious elite... quote>

    This is clearly the only logical conclusion here. =|

    rock20on20handji2.jpg

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    The conspiracy theory that all of these leaders are within a satanist cult is nothing short of absolutely ridiculous, and at best seems to be the product of a somewhat deranged or paranoid mind.

    The gesture is a common greeting. Even I've used it. And of course, it also is a 'rock on' signage, as Voar mentioned, and also of course a sign associated with the Texas Longhorns.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Some of those people are saying "I love you" in American Sign Language.

    iloveyoustamps_smaller.jpg


    We can inspire others through witness so that one grows together in communicating. But the worst thing of all is religious proselytism, which paralyzes: “I am talking with you in order to persuade you.” No. Each person dialogues, starting with his and her own identity. The church grows by attraction, not proselytizing.    - Pope Francis

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     
    SkiGeek: heh, I never knew there was an American version of sign language. I'm quite fluent in, I guess it would be called, British sign language; but yours is totally different 3.gif

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Originally posted by: Boggy1

    SkiGeek: heh, I never knew there was an American version of sign language. I'm quite fluent in, I guess it would be called, British sign language; but yours is totally different 3.gifquote>

    I used to share an office with a deaf guy.  He claimed that he and a deaf French person could communicate better than I could with a French person.  (which is entirely true, considering how basic my French is.)

    He told me all sorts of signs they don't teach you in class, including various ways to cuss, depending on how vehement and crude you feel like being.

    I can communicate with any patient person who knows ASL.  But it has to be patient person because my ASL isn't that great, even though it's better than my French.  Oddly, when I was in Paris and was fumbling around trying to find the words, I noticed that I using ASL signs.  As if that was going to help.  18.gif

    Edit:  Boggy, it is called British Sign Language and it is quite different.


    We can inspire others through witness so that one grows together in communicating. But the worst thing of all is religious proselytism, which paralyzes: “I am talking with you in order to persuade you.” No. Each person dialogues, starting with his and her own identity. The church grows by attraction, not proselytizing.    - Pope Francis

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted:
    Last Online:  
     

    Bush a satanist? LOL! Now I've heard it all. OK, I've actually heard that before.  'Well known fact', my aunt Fanny. Al Gore is supposed to secretly be a shamanist pagan, but there's no real evidence of that that I've seen, either.

    Back on topic; I am still of the opinion that Obama cannot win in November, and I have seen very little to change that. A good thing, too, IMHO
    As a born and bred Chicagoan, I would never ever put a Chicago politician in the White House. There has not been an honest pol from my hometown in 150 years. We've had more aldermen and congressmen go to prison than almost any other town in the US.  And they all preached 'Change! '
    A product of the Cook County Democratic Committee is never going to be a trustworthy candidate for anything. Look at Mayor Daley! The Chicago Mob got its man on the Supreme Court in the '50s, and got his son into the US Attorney General post. Don't underestimate the reach of political corruption from the Cook County Dems. Trust me on this.


    Let no one yield, we're on the field where deeds eclipse the sun; where the brave are told on a thread of gold, the tapestry is spun. As they speak of dreams, their armor gleams, this calm before the storm... Where all can see their destiny, the bishop takes the pawn.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Sign In or register to comment...

    To comment in reply, you must be a community member

    Sign In  

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

    Create an Account  

    Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  

    Register a New Account

    Sign In to follow this  

    • Recently Browsing   0 members

      No registered users viewing this page.

    ×

    Thank You for the Continued Support!

    Simtropolis depends on donations to fund site maintenance costs.
    Without your support, we just would not be in our 24th year online!  You really help make this a great community. *:thumb:

    But we still need your support to stay online. If you're able to, please consider a donation to help us stay up and running. This helps sustain a platform where we can share our community creations for years to come.

    Make a Donation, Get a Gift!

    Expand your city with the best from the Simtropolis Exchange.
    Make a Donation and get one or all three discs today!

    STEX Collections

    By way of a "Thank You" gift, we'd like to send you our STEX Collector's DVD. It's some of the best buildings, lots, maps and mods collected for you over the years. Check out the STEX Collections for more info.

    Each donation helps keep Simtropolis online, open and free!

    Thank you for reading and enjoy the site!

    More About STEX Collections