Everyone knows Nintendo puts out fun well made games and their reputation as a developer for kids is well deserved. What is wrong with making games for kids, same as Pixar makes films for kids? I don't see how these awards will change people's minds. Yes, Nintendo does have more mature titles, but it is known for it's games that appeal to general audiences and kids.
I guess what I was trying to say is that I think its unfair that some people discredit Nintendo as a developer because of the perception that it is a developer for kids. Personally, I think Nintendo's games are wrongly labeled as kids' games because of their appearance, the way they are marketed, and the lighthearted nature of games like Super Mario Bros. or Kirby; however, if perple who perceived Nintendo games this way really delved into games like Metriod or Zelda, they would find that many Nintendo games have a level of depth and an exploration of more serious themes that would never be found in the average kid's game.
Well then your opinion is invalid. Not trying to be mean, but it is just unfair to pick a winner with such biases and lack of experience with both products. I love the GTA 5 remaster, but I can't say it deserves to win over Pokemon since I haven't played the Pokemon remasters. Much like I can't pick a Game of the Year since I've played none of the titles on that list. My personal Game of the Year is Alien: Isolation, but that doesn't mean much since I've only played 3 or 4 games this year.
No, you're right. I would be a bad judge because I have never played many of these games. I have, however, played ΩR/αS, and besides the fact that I enjoy playing it, I think it was more deserving of a win than GTA because I consider it more of a remaster than GTA V is. As I understand it, GTA V is just another title in a series - not a remake of a previous game - while Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire were new versions of the original Ruby and Sapphire on the GBA
I loved the Adr1ft trailer, that game looks pretty amazing. That Untitled game by Hazelight also looks pretty darn cool. I'm interested in No Man's Sky but I keep wondering what you really do in that game. It seems you just go from planet to planet going: "oooh, ahhh, so pretty". The Zelda reveal looked pretty cool too, but I'm not going to get a WiiU just to play that game. One thing they didn't show in the Zelda trailer that I'm really interested in is the towns. I want to see what they've improved about cities and towns. In previous Zelda titles they felt quite empty and lifeless. I hope they've added a lot more NPCs and side-quests you can get from them.
I agree. The graphics of Adr1ft are incredible - probably too incredible for my laptop, unfortunately. As for the Zelda reveal, I'm also interested in seeing the towns they have planned. With the huge world open to explore, I hope they include a lot more places to go and more NPCs to interact with, as well as more quests to complete.