Jump to content
  •   Announcement

Sign In to follow this  
  • Entries
    20
  • Comments
    103
  • Views
    16,450

Traffic Problem in Rexdale... Slightly Relieved..

Sign In to follow this  
regionlong

492 Views

intro15v.png

Today is May 22, G.Y. 2

Thanks for attending the meeting, despite today being a Saturday.

Thanks for Counsellor _marsh_'s opinions, a new highway by-pass has been constructed in Rexdale, by-passing the town centre. The traffic problem was slightly relieved. It was absolutely necessary, though the environmental activists complained that it cost a lot of 1) money, and 2) damage to the environment. The highway corridor traverses the ecologically sesnitive highlands. It required a lot of terraforming and traversing through woodlands. We have re-instated some of these woodlands, as promised to the environmental activists. However, they see this as an opportunity for the government to promote urban sprawl.

Constructions were also noted as particularly difficult due to the steep landscape of the town on the rise of the highlands.

20100522112359.png

Figure 1 - Our area of focus: The Town of Rexdale. The new highway corridor created a "scar" in the farmlands, and thus is extremely visible in the satellite imagery.

The New Highway Corridor

20100522112905.png

Figure 2 - As aforementioned, the new corridor traversed through the farmlands of Rexdale.

20100522112702.png

Figure 3 - However, the new highway corridor had amazing results. Within 6 months of opening, the highway is carrying 17,756 cars and 8,200 buses. The section of the highway shown here is near the community of Rexdale West.

20100522112958.png

Figure 4 - Another section of the highway by-pass traversing through parts of the industrial park in Rexdale. (Due to screenshot glitches, I didn't capture the traffic stats properly). However, as I recalled, over 23,000 cars and 9,000 buses travel through the corridor, not to mention about 200 freight trucks.

The new highway by-pass surely helped diverted traffic. Look at

The Old Highway Corridor

20100522112737.png

Figure 5 - The old highway corridor. This highway corridor was formerly jammed by near 30,000 cars plus 9,000 buses. Now with the diversion provided with the new by-pass has relieved this corridor, down to 18,950 buses and 1,134 cars.

Before

highwayproblem25000cars.png

After

20100522112817.png

Figure 6 - More usage stats of the old corridor. The corridor is still very popular (or become even more popular) for buses, while cars tend to use the new corridor.

Let's do some Before and After analysis here of some in-town routes, and evaluate the usefulness and efficiency of the new corridor.

Before

roadproblem26600cars.png

After

20100522112809.png    

Figure 7 - Before and after of an in-town route. Though the number of buses slightly increased, the number of cars greatly decreased from 26,653 to 430. That's a drop of a whopping 98.3%!!

More before and after analysis.

Before

avenueproblem27333cars.png

After

20100522112759.png

Figure 8 - The number of cars using this in-town avenue drastically decreased from 27,333 cars to 1,078 cars. That's a drop of a whopping 96.1%!!

20100522113015.png

Figure 9 - Even with the new highway corridor, there are still congested sections from place to place. This is best represented near major intersections, and curves on the highway.

20100522113024.png

Figure 10 - The general flow of traffic in town. The two corridors are still noted with capacity over 300% in places. The in-town routes that was previously congested has now reduced to 40% of capacity.

Did you think the new highway by-pass worked efficiently? Or do you have another suggestion in mind? (We're still open to more suggestions to solve the problem. Every day in the two commutes, there are at least 80,000 cars and buses, if not more, flowing through this town of 7,000 people.)

--------------------------------

That is it for the meeting. Please be on time for our next meeting. You can do that by SUBSCRIBING the journal.

I know I am jumping around between topics, but for your general idea of where are we going next:

NEXT UP: Urban Expansion in Action >>

AND THEN: Queen Elizabeth Corridor >>

-----------------

The regional chair

----------------

We are now online! (Along with other regions) Check out http://gravenhurst.wikia.com

Currently, Watersauga only has 2 articles out of the 133 articles. The other articles are about another region.

-----------------

Constructional comments are appreciated!

Site Meter

Sign In to follow this  


4 Comments


Recommended Comments

Hey, President Regionlong. I think that the new Highway Corridor is definately efficient. It is good that the traffic is diverted away from the city and into the farmlands. The traffic on the city's roads was too bad, so it was a good decision. It has also come to my attention that lots of commuters are using public transport, so that is another good thing.
- Counsellor Sam

Share this comment


Link to comment
try relocating jobs intown to the new corrider area(some loss in farmland) and plan it well. That will save gas and pollution

Share this comment


Link to comment

Wow, that coridor had insanly drastic effects. It definitle helped alot and was a good use of money. I agree with consiler Raceman too. I would relocate alot of jobs.

However I have another sugjestion. Have you ever thought about using the RHW? it has higher capacities than the regular maxis highways and could be very useful. For this region 8 lane highways may be needed.

,Counsellor marsh

Share this comment


Link to comment
@ Counsellor Samerton (Sam):

Thanks for your opinion!

@ Counsellor Raceman95:

I will definitely consider that. There are only 27,000 industrial jobs plus 2,000 commercial jobs in-town. However, most of the cars and buses on the corridor are commuting to the nearby town with 55,000 industrial jobs plus 1,000 commercial jobs.

Now here comes the question, should the corridor around the farmland be developed? If so, what zone type? Industrial, or residential? (We have demands for both, but residential demand is greater than industrial)

@ Counsellor _marsh_:
Thanks once again for your comment. I have the RHW plugin on my computer, however I mostly use it in rural areas. I'm too lazy (and too dumb) to learn how to use the RHW properly. So far, through rural areas, I have constructed RHW-2 and RHW-4. I don't know how to build anything over RHW-4, and the interchanges for RHW-4 are already hard enough :P (I'm currently using a + intersection instead of proper interchanges). Anyhow, thanks for the comment. Maybe you can teach me how to use the RHW?

I will definitely consider RHWs though.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Sign In or register to comment...

To comment in reply, you must be a community member

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  

Register a New Account

×

Thank You for the Continued Support!

Simtropolis depends on donations to fund site maintenance costs.
Without your support, we just would not be in our 24th year online!  You really help make this a great community. *:thumb:

But we still need your support to stay online. If you're able to, please consider a donation to help us stay up and running. This helps sustain a platform where we can share our community creations for years to come.

Make a Donation, Get a Gift!

Expand your city with the best from the Simtropolis Exchange.
Make a Donation and get one or all three discs today!

STEX Collections

By way of a "Thank You" gift, we'd like to send you our STEX Collector's DVD. It's some of the best buildings, lots, maps and mods collected for you over the years. Check out the STEX Collections for more info.

Each donation helps keep Simtropolis online, open and free!

Thank you for reading and enjoy the site!

More About STEX Collections