Jump to content
  •   Announcement

  • Entries
    22
  • Comments
    144
  • Views
    10,734

CHAPTER 09 -- THE COALING COMPLEX

ar50M2w.jpg

 

Chapter 09: THE COALING COMPLEX

 

By the mid-19th Century, the three-decked Ship-Of-The-Line so artfully handled by Admiral Lord Nelson, had ruled the world’s oceans for nearly 300 years with very little technological change. Had Sir Frances Drake been pipped aboard HMS Victory he would have been amazed – but would have known how to use the ship. That’s because Victory, though bigger, more heavily armed, and more modern, was little changed from the premise of Drake’s Golden Hind.

 

The Industrial Revolution of the early 1800’s began to change all that. Science and technology had harnessed steam power to run factories, and soon thereafter, steam locomotives. It was inevitable that some “bright young feller” would figure out how to propel ships with steam engines. For centuries, empires had been won or lost for want of “a fair wind”. Steam powered ships would be able to sail in any direction, regardless of wind, and much faster.

 

USS Demologos was the first warship to be propelled by a steam engine. Commissioned in 1815, she was hailed as quite an accomplishment, but her slow speed and unreliable engines relegated her to duty in New York Harbor as a floating battery. But it was a “beginning”.

The outbreak of the Crimean War in 1854 saw a combined French and British fleet of three-decked Ships-Of-The-Line gathered off Sevastopol – accompanied by paddle-wheeled steam tugs to make them more tactically mobile.

But both Britain and France had been experimenting with “steam” Ships-Of-The-Line for more than five years by then. The British, reluctant to give up their place as THE first rank naval power, began converting suitable “three-deckers” to steam-assisted warships while retaining their full sailing rig. This was a rather parsimonious attempt to keep their numerical superiority while saving the cost of new, scratch-built ships.

 

The French, on the other hand, realized old three-deckers, fitted with steam engines, would still retain their bluff bows and bulbous underwater lines – reducing their speed. Instead, they built a new class of three-deckers designed around steam engines with underwater lines better suited to speed. Launched in 1850, Napoleon (90 guns), name ship of the class, became the first purpose-built steam battleship in the world – the first true steam battleship – and the first screw propelled battleship. Nelson’s Victory could make all of four knots with a “fair wind” in her sails. Napoleon, under sail and steam, could maintain 14 knots.

wATZnZp.jpg

From that day forward, the navies of the world were committed to “steam” – and the COAL that made it possible. The French had done away with any thought of half-measures. And with Britain and France being “colonial powers”, they relied upon their naval forces to protect and police their colonies as well as the sea lanes leading to and from them. Now, a nation’s “seapower” could only be projected as far as the supply of coal in a ship’s bunkers would allow. And the freedom of action of every Admiral or ship’s Captain was limited by the distance to his next coaling stop.

 

So the race to secure strategically located colonies began in earnest. Any nation with the slightest pretense of being a world naval power had to establish colonies along the major sea lanes within easy steaming distance of one another. By stopping at each coaling station in turn, you could – theoretically – sail a fleet from Portsmouth, England to Shanghai, China. (Case in point; the deployment of the Russian Baltic Fleet to Chinese waters in 1905 – and the 1907 round-the-world cruise of the Great White Fleet.) And so began the love-hate relationship between battleships, their crews, and coal.

 

This view of the High Seas Fleet steaming in column toward the horizon is, indeed, a majestic sight. The power and might of these smoke-belching behemoths is quite obvious. What is not so obvious, is the vast amount of back-breaking labor that went into producing those voluminous clouds of smoke.

vr0veeF.jpg

 

Deep inside the bowels of the battleship, and located adjacent to the engine rooms, are the boiler rooms. Here, a crew of “stokers” continually fed shovelfuls of coal into the roaring fireboxes beneath the boilers. In turn, the water inside the heated boilers produced steam to run the engines or turbines turning the propellers. These stokers were often referred to as “the black gang” – because their sweat-drenched bodies were covered in a thick grime of coal dust. During a battleship’s periodic “speed trails”, several teams of stokers would be kept on stand-by to relieve exhausted men, or to replace those overcome by heat prostration.

 

The coal is stored in chambers (called bunkers) located in such manner as to make moving coal to the furnaces as easy as possible. The arrangement of these bunkers differed somewhat from ship to ship and, more significantly, from nation to nation. In the Kaiserliche Marine, coal bunkers were arranged along the sides of the warship, usually just behind the torpedo bulkhead. In addition to the thick external armor belt, and thinner torpedo bulkhead designed to absorb blast, placing tons and tons of coal inboard provided yet another layer of protection. This practice proved quite successful in allowing warships to absorb heavy battle damage and continue to fight.

 

When “coaling ship” was ordered, “every man Jack” would turn to and get the coal aboard as quickly as possible. Even junior officers could be required to participate in this filthy, hard labor. The coal bunkers were accessed via openings in the main deck (called scuttles). Once the scuttle plate was removed, dockside cranes, or loading chutes, would deposit piles of coal onto the deck. Men with shovels then scooped the dusty black mound into the scuttles. This dirty, dust-choking, hard labor went on for hours until several thousand tons of coal was loaded (usually 3,000 to 4,000 tons).

 

In the picture below, the USS New Hampshire is taking on coal from a barge tied alongside. Obviously, the Brooklyn Navy Yard in 1909 did not have any sophisticated hoppers or loading towers, so the crewmen are doing it by hand. They have rigged temporary derricks to hoist canvas sacks of coal to the ship’s deck where it will be dumped, and then shoveled into the round scuttle clearly visible in the deck.

aVr5BQ8.jpg

 

In the next picture, a ship is taking on coal at Port Said in the Suez Canal Zone (circa 1920’s). Again, the coal barges are tied alongside the vessel – but the men are carrying the coal aboard. Coaling in “far distant” ports could be quite primitive.

rl83yK9.jpg

 

The Coaling Complex for the Imperial Dockyard: Wilhelmshaven is “state of the art” and was based on a massive US Navy coaling station in Pensacola, Florida just after the turn of the last century. I managed to find a usable picture of a slightly improved version built in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii (circa 1919).

As you can see, the loading docks were built out into the water on tall trestle bridges, allowing deeper draft vessels easy access. Loaded rail cars were shuttled under the “hopper towers” where bucket conveyors raised coal to the top of the hopper. Loading chutes would then be lowered near to the ship’s deck – and the process would begin. Rail cars continued to shuttle beneath the hoppers as needed.

Ss3uvv1.jpg

The oval track arrangement saves enormous amounts of space, while allowing a loaded coal train to gradually climb to the level of the loading hoppers. Other track spurs provide for temporary “parking” of loaded cars, storage of coal at the rear, and switches to return empty cars to the main complex.

It went without saying that it would be impossible to find a skilled “Batter” interested in such a mammoth and complicated project. Even in modules, this would require a great deal of planning and technical skill, with many opportunities for failure. Consequently, I fell back on my skills at finding existing SC4 lots and props that could be re-purposed and pieced together to build a reasonable facsimile. I already knew I would not be able to recreate the structure, but the “oval” rail concept was crucial in saving space within the dockyard.

My secondary goal was to show the COMPLETE process of providing coal to ships – from start to finish. In this single complex, you can see how coal is delivered to the coaling station, unloaded, handled for processing, stored, and then distributed to warships – the whole product path. I was determined NOT to plop a pile of coal next to a ship and say...”Yeah – that’s where they get coal.”

 

Here are four shots showing the progressive stages of construction.

svgSl45.jpg


tGEMN98.jpg


LFos4Bd.jpg


l9BWS6F.jpg

 

And this is a closer view of the overall complex.

5C2R4xr.jpg


C4TuOEr.jpg

Looking north from the Munitions Complex, across the wide channel leading to the Coaling Basin, it is easy to pick out the peninsula occupied by the crowded sprawl of the Coaling Complex. The largest integrated facility in the dockyard, the Coaling Station was placed at the far end of the harbor to keep the heavy “coaling traffic” from interfering with other facilities. It also helped that the prevailing wind would blow the clouds of soot and dust away from the rest of the dockyard.

The “Complex” is almost a world of its’ own. Warships coming and going, coaling docks, cranes and derricks, warehouses, huge mounds of black coal, processing plants, receiving lots, receiving docks, and a swarm of puffing steam locomotives moving tons and tons of coal.

Beyond that dusty, smoking jumble of activity you can just make out a railyard dedicated to handling and repairing the fleet of engines and hundreds of pieces of rolling stock required to service the complex.

 

But down in the Coaling Basin Channel, movement catches our eye……

BLDMIZT.jpg


DzTE0gN.jpg

SMS Viribus Unitas is under tow. Two steam tugs astern of the battleship are passing hawsers to act as “brakes”. A third steam tug stands by to assist. And the larger steam tug Goliath has already paid out her tow line in readiness to move. Goliath was brought in to provide a little extra “muscle”, since moving the battleship through the tight quarters from the far end of the basin might require some brute force “finesse”.

h1wMHQe.jpg

Viribus Unitas was the name ship of a class of four Austro-Hungarian dreadnoughts. With the collapse of the Empire in 1918, she was handed over to the provisional Yugoslavian Government in October of that year. On the night of November 10th, Italians managed to get into the harbor of Pola and sink her with an explosive charge.

 

fWhpfgf.jpg

Goliath is a bit larger than the “harbor tug” pictured off her port quarter. (Beautifully detailed and textured model provided by @Barroco Hispano.) Originally used as a sea-going salvage tug, she is from a large class built around 1907 and well able to withstand heavy seas the harbor tugs cannot. Due to advancing age, she and her sisters have been replaced by a bigger, and more powerful class of “Fleet Salvage Tugs”. But still sound and seaworthy, the “Goliaths” have been assigned to deal with a new menace to naval warfare – floating mines. Note the two “greenish”, fish-shaped objects stowed on her aft deck – those are “paravanes”.  "Harbor Tug" courtesy of @WolfZe.

This model is an accurate and highly detailed example of the hundreds of obscure seagoing tugs and salvage boats that worked the far and forgotten corners of the World’s seas. Their arrival amid fifty foot waves and howling winds could mean the difference between life and death and the safety of much larger ships in danger of foundering. The aging, weathered decks and the “classic” ochre and black paint scheme make this model come alive.

 

n91iZXK.jpg

Tucked into the corner of the Coaling Basin are the Minesweeper Docks. Goliath is the “flotilla leader” and, during time of war, they are charged with keeping the sea lanes in and out of the Jade Bight free of enemy minefields. When “sweeping” a field of mines, the tugs would usually deploy in “echelon” in an overlapping, inverted “V” formation. Those paravanes on the aft deck would be deployed and streamed on both sides of the tug. The paravanes stretched wire tow cables outboard from the ship – much like a modern sonar device. The cables snagged the anchor lines of floating, submerged mines, the paravane teeth severed them, and they came to the surface where they were destroyed by small arms fire. Needless to say, minesweeper crews received “hazard pay”.

 

kv0WsEV.jpg

Just above the Minesweeper Station, along the west side of the Coaling Basin, are two “Offshore Mooring Points”. These are semi-permanent berthing arrangements built from thick pilings driven into the harbor bottom and capped with steel and concrete landing platforms. They are decked over and provided with night lighting to allow “anchor details” easy handling of large mooring hawsers. I believe these are unique to Pearl Harbor and can still be seen by thousands of tourists visiting the USS Arizona Memorial. MANY THANKS to @mattb325 for cheerfully fulfilling my request and releasing them to the community as “Offshore Mooring Pontoons”.

 

oCLDWB3.jpg

The USS New York was completed in 1914 and, much like her predecessors – at 27,000 tons – tended toward the wide beam common to most US battleships. A jump to the heavier 14 inch / 45 cal gun was made, but her designers continued to experiment with the placement of the main battery turrets. It was finally decided to use a five turret, twin gun arrangement modified from the earlier Florida Class. After failed negotiations with the builder, the US Navy chose to revert to triple expansion reciprocating engines producing a speed of 21 knots. She served in both World Wars and was expended as a target in 1948.

 

w3nDXtw.jpg

USS Texas, sister to New York, was completed as an identical twin and her service career was much the same as well. You see the ship in her 1932 configuration after a complete modernization. During WW II, Texas was part of the Bombardment Group off Omaha Beach during the D-Day Landings in Normandy. Her ten 14 inch rifles provided quick and accurate gunfire support and was much appreciated by the assault troops moving inland. German Panzers poised to counterattack the American beachhead were quickly demoralized and scattered when two-gun salvos of the huge shells began to arrive at 5 second intervals. In 1948 the State of Texas took great pride in accepting her from the US Navy for preservation as a museum ship. She still lies in a berth dredged out of the Mexican War Battlefield Memorial at San Jacinto, near Houston. At 106 years of age, Texas may well be the oldest – and possibly the only – surviving example of the “true” dreadnought battleship.

 

Next time…...The Coaling Docks.

3J3rjw2.jpg

 

 

As always --- MANY, MANY, MANY THANKS to @Barroco Hispano for his intricately detailed, and beautifully textured warship models. As a "semi-professional" naval historian, I take a great deal of pleasure in simply gazing at these beautiful models of the ships I have avidly studied for six decades. I have NEVER found any form of illustration to be as informative or pleasing as these models.

 

If you enjoyed anything you saw – please punch the “like” button so I will know. A comment would be even more informative.

 

Comments and critiques requested and gratefully accepted. All questions answered promptly to the best of my ability.

 

THANK YOU for your visit !

  • Like 20


11 Comments


Recommended Comments

Nice work on the coaling complex. That would have been a tricky one to assemble with the parts available, but you've made it look really believable, especially when seeing a photo of the historic version *:thumb:

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

Loved the history lesson - those loading docks are something else. :ooh:

It's very enjoyable to see how much detail and care you take with the history, keep up the good work!

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

As a military historian as well as a SimCity builder, I am EXTREMELY impressed by the detail on the dreadnought battlewagons in your port.

Yes, USS Texas is the sole surviving dreadnought on the planet. There were three "generations" of dreadnoughts, the original, coal-fired ships built before the Great War. The second generation came after the Great War and were oil-fired. The third generation were designed and built during the late 1930s and during World War II. They make up the other seven surviving battleships. All are American, and all are museums. They are as follows, by class:

USS North Carolina

 

USS Alabama

USS Massachusetts

 

 

USS Iowa

USS New Jersey

USS Missouri

USS Wisconsin

Your cover shot shows to American pre-dreadnought battleships that were sold to Greece. Under the white cross, they were the Kilkis and Lemnos. They hung in until World War II, with one as an accommodation ship and the other as a combat/training vessel. The Luftwaffe's Stukas took care of them at their pier in 1941.

The Viribus Unitus (proper spelling) was one of the prime dreadnoughts of the Austro-Hungarian Imperial Navy, commanded by Adm. Miklos Horthy. After Austria-Hungary split up into its component nations, Horthy retained his rank and became Regent of the kingdom until they could crown a monarch. He figured he could do better than some child-king, so Hungary became a kingdom without a king ruled by an admiral without a Navy in a nation without a seacoast. Logically, he supported Hitler in World War II until things went wrong, and he tried to extricate the Magyars from their mess. Hitler's SS got wind of his scheme to switch sides, and sent in legendary scar-faced SS commando Otto Skorzeny to kidnap Horthy's son, who had spent the war in Budapest's nightclubs, boozing it up and bedding women.

"Operation Panzerfaust" worked out well for Skorzeny and Hitler -- they hauled off the younger Horthy in a giant Persian carpet, the elder Horthy quit his job, and he was replaced by the Green Cross Party, headed by Ference Szalasi. The first thing he did was end Hungary's protection of its Jews and ship the lot off to Auschwitz, in November 1944. This is why many surviving Holocaust Jews are Hungarian -- last in, first out, sadly.

As for the Viribus Unitus, as Austria-Hungary was disintegrating in October 1918, she was taken over by her mutinous crew. However, the Italians did not know this. They were very good in the Great War with midget submarines (and better in the war that came after that) and sent out a midget submarine to sink her, and the midget submarine did just that. Whoops.

Another big shot in the Austro-Hungarian Navy was submariner Kapitan zur See von Trapp. In 1939, by then a widower with six kids and married to Maria, the Nazis ordered him to report to Bremen to lead their U-Boats. He loaded the family and 13 trunks into a train and went to Switzerland and America and became...."The Sound of Music." Or the "Von Trapp Family Singers." The movie took a LOT of liberties with the history.

The stuff about coaling ships above is deadly accurate. In the Royal Navy, "Hands Coal Ship" was an order that took precedence over EVERYTHING else. The only sailors exempted were the radio-telegraph operators, so that their hands and fingers would not get ground down. Officers would haul the filthy mineral aboard and down the chutes. In the boiler rooms, temperatures got up to 130, when ships were at sea. The high in low in these operations was when Tsar Nicholas II was fighting Japan in 1904 and sent his Baltic and Black Sea Fleets all the way around the world to face the Japanese. Vice Adm. Zinovyi Petrovich Rozhestvensky's ships were jammed with coal and struggled to make it from Libau in the Baltic to the Korean Coast. When they got there, the Japanese soundly whipped them in two hours, in a classic "Fire-Away Flanagan."

A good book on the Russian Navy's ordeal is "The Fleet That Had to Die" by Richard Hough.

A good book on life in the Royal Navy's main base in two world wars with an entire chapter on coaling is "Scapa Flow" by Malcolm Brown and Patricia Meehan..

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

@Kiwiwriter47

First -- let me say that I am VERY pleased to receive your comment (THANK YOU), and that finding a fellow "enthusiast" is quite gratifying, indeed!  *:D  *:D

I do beg your pardon for the spelling error -- it was a slip on my part.  I usually go with "Unitis", as the "English" adaptation of the name -- but my big, fat fingers outran my tired, old brain cells.  *:party:

You, Sir, do know your naval history!  *:thumb: 

Many people have an inbred revulsion to the mere thought of "history", but I have long believed it is because they have never received a "complete" education.  Almost everyone has seen "The Sound Of Music" at least once -- but hardly anyone receives the full story of Kapitan zur See von Trapp.  And it is my belief that those are the details that make history enjoyable, as well as memorable.  And the sinking of the Viribus Unitis by an Italian midget submarine -- after it was surrendered to a non-belligerent -- is one of the ironies of history that are the most compelling. 

It is a great sadness to me that the British, of all nations, failed to save a single example of their many fine and illustrious battleships.  I am proud to have been able to visit USS New Jersey when she was still on active duty in the late 1960's -- and I have since visited Texas, Alabama, and North Carolina in their "museum" berths.  I am always in awe of the massive size and technical complexity of the battleship.  They were the culmination of Man's mechanical ingenuity.  And the potential destructive power of their guns is truly beyond comprehension of anyone who has not witnessed it first hand.

The "cover shot" presented a bit of a problem.  I studied the picture with great care and came to the conclusion that they were, in fact, Idaho and Mississippi.  However -- the service careers of the two vessels never placed them in Pearl Harbor.  Studying them again, the only other battleships they could possibly be were the USS South Carolina and USS Michigan (sister ships).  Both of whom, it turns out, did take Midshipmen from Annapolis on training cruises to Honolulu in 1920 -- arriving there in June and July of that year.  So......the first US dreadnoughts are pictured in the primitive beginnings of what would come to be known as "Pearl".  Note the "collier" over the starboard bow -- and the dry dock in the picture is the same one that held USS Pennsylvania during the 1941 attack.  (Ford Island would be "off-picture" to the right.)

Mr. Hough's fine book has held a place in my library since it's first publication, and I will be looking for Brown & Meehan's "Scapa Flow".  The chapter on coaling will, no doubt, be illuminating.  Santa Claus is about to bring me a copy of David Brown's rather pricey "The Grand Fleet: Warship Design & Development 1906 - 1922".  My mouth waters at the thought! *:ohyes:

I have enjoyed this little chat immensely and hope you will see fit to visit again -- your comments will always be warmly welcomed.... *:thumb: *:thumb:  *:thumb:

THANK YOU ! 

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

Thank you for the warm words!

I know that history because I write magazine articles on World War II for WW2 History. My latest was a two-parter on the Battle of the Philippine Sea. George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, and Bob Feller were all in that battle.

I was on Iowa and Wisconsin while they were in active service, and New Jersey after she retired. I have also seen Massachusetts.

If any two British battleships should have been saved from the ocean depths or scrap men, there are two: Hood and Warspite. Both symbolized the Royal Navy. Oddly enough, the first metal fighting ship, HMS Warrior, used as a platform, was restored, as was light cruiser HMS Caroline in Belfast, the last survivor of Jutland, and, of course, HMS Belfast, which helped sink the Scharnhorst, bombarded Normandy on D-Day, and did the same in the Korean War.

There is one surviving pre-dreadnought, Mikasa, and what's interesting about her is that she was damaged by Curtis LeMay's bombers, and required a lot of repair before reopening in 1961. How did they accomplish the massive restoration needed? Simple. Chile sold Japan the battleship Admiral Latorre for scrap, and as the Japanese disassembled it, they removed similar parts and hauled them across Yokusuka Navy Yard to fit them into Mikasa.

The Americans did something similar in the last years that USS Lexington was serving as a training carrier -- they had no parts left for Essex-class carriers except on the museum ships: Intrepid, Yorktown, and Hornet, so they would remove a part from one of the three. That was one of the biggest reasons the Iowa-class battleships were finally paid off and donated as museums -- the Navy could no longer find parts to keep them sailing any more, particularly for the 15-inch turrets and guns.

When Iowa and New Jersey were first recommissioned in the early 1980s, Navy Personnel scoured their lists of retired first-classes and Chiefs who had served on battleships and heavy cruisers (with guns) and asked them, "Do you feel like going back on active duty as a plankowner on the New Jersey or Iowa?" They got a tremendous positive response. The Chiefs on those ships needed recruits to carry around their additional hashmarks.

Scapa Flow is a small paperback...you can find it on Amazon. You can find my book "David H Lippman" is the author, the book is "World War II Plus 75: The Road to War" there as well.

Fair winds and following seas! Or is it the other way around? I forget.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

@Kiwiwriter47

Nice of you to drop by, again -- *:thumb:

I, too, much like Churchill -- write for a living.  But I use various "pen names" for a variety of reasons -- mostly self-preservation.  I have a tendency to "challenge" the "sacred cow theories" of history, which automatically results in disagreement -- some of it quite vociferous.  For example: saying anything about Robert E. Lee these days will draw fire from all directions. *;)  I have, in the past, even advanced the theory that the Imperial German battlecruisers were, in fact, the precursors of the "fast battleship concept" -- and given time -- would have fully evolved.  That sparked a good deal of discussion in several journals.  But I have a special fondness for those ships and I'm afraid it shows in my work.

I visited HMS Victory and HMS Belfast some years ago and have almost worked myself up to making the flight to see HMS Warrior -- but the COVID situation makes that impossible. 

The Japanese people are both intelligent and determined, and it is "right and proper" that they held Mikasa in such esteem that they went to great lengths to refurbish her.  Mikasa, like HMS Victory and the USS Constitution, represent both the "spirit" and pinnacle of achievement of their naval service.  And Latorre could have come to a much more sorry end than that.

I agree that HOOD would have been ideal as a museum ship, but "The Gods Of War" had other ideas.  I think HMS Iron Duke was important enough and typical of the Grand Fleet of WW I and should have been saved.  And ABSOLUTELY HMS Warspite !!  The old girl was everywhere, did everything, and even resisted her tormentors on the way to the breaker's yard.  She was the epitome of "fighting spirit".

Ta, Mate --

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

The German battleships had pretty good design, but weren't good for long voyages. Indeed, when they were in harbor, the crew lived in barracks ashore, much like submariners today. The Bismarck pair were basically upgraded versions of the Baden-class.

Iron Duke should definitely have been saved as well, along with Dreadnought.

 

Well, here's to Pearl Harbor Day on Monday. 

Pearl Harbor 04.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

Yes -- the Bismarcks were, indeed, updated and upgraded from the Baden Class (I mention that in Chapter 02) and proved to be significantly capable of withstanding an immense amount of punishment.  Had there not been a single "stringbag" Swordfish torpedo plane, history might have written a far different chapter.  I have always wondered if the two British battleships could have finished her off if she had been capable of maneuver.  The Nelson Class had bigger guns, but were "treaty battleships" -- oddly designed -- with a poor armor scheme.  The King George V Class were only 35,000 tons and certainly less well armored.  But two battleships to one might have been enough.

Monday will be the 79th anniversary -- and let us salute those who still stand watch aboard the Oklahoma and Arizona.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Late into the frey --I took a slow boat to Wilhelmshaven ! Still impressive and well set-up. You managed to make this a realistically busy port and the ships, as usual, are to die for. *:thumb:

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment
1 hour ago, Dreadnought said:

Yes -- the Bismarcks were, indeed, updated and upgraded from the Baden Class (I mention that in Chapter 02) and proved to be significantly capable of withstanding an immense amount of punishment.  Had there not been a single "stringbag" Swordfish torpedo plane, history might have written a far different chapter.  I have always wondered if the two British battleships could have finished her off if she had been capable of maneuver.  The Nelson Class had bigger guns, but were "treaty battleships" -- oddly designed -- with a poor armor scheme.  The King George V Class were only 35,000 tons and certainly less well armored.  But two battleships to one might have been enough.

Monday will be the 80th anniversary -- and let us salute those who still stand watch aboard the Oklahoma and Arizona.

The Swordfish was one of the most successful torpedo bombers in history. Amazing plane. Fought throughout the war.

Don't forget the poor guys who manned USS Utah. At least one of them earned a posthumous Medal of Honor that day and it took decades to find a relative to present it to: Chief Water Tender Walter Tomich.

 

Pearl Harbor 09.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Sign In or register to comment...

To comment in reply, you must be a community member

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  

Register a New Account

×

Thank You for the Continued Support!

Simtropolis depends on donations to fund site maintenance costs.
Without your support, we just would not be in our 24th year online!  You really help make this a great community. *:thumb:

But we still need your support to stay online. If you're able to, please consider a donation to help us stay up and running. This helps sustain a platform where we can share our community creations for years to come.

Make a Donation, Get a Gift!

Expand your city with the best from the Simtropolis Exchange.
Make a Donation and get one or all three discs today!

STEX Collections

By way of a "Thank You" gift, we'd like to send you our STEX Collector's DVD. It's some of the best buildings, lots, maps and mods collected for you over the years. Check out the STEX Collections for more info.

Each donation helps keep Simtropolis online, open and free!

Thank you for reading and enjoy the site!

More About STEX Collections