Jump to content
  •   Announcement

Sign In to follow this  
  • Entries
    20
  • Comments
    103
  • Views
    16,450

Say NO to Urban Sprawl

Sign In to follow this  
regionlong

329 Views

Intro5.png

Date: February 20, G.Y. 2

Welcome, counsellors! Thank you for all your comments on our last post. We will consider your comments.

Sorry... I "lied" in my previous entry. Instead of discussing the northern end of the corridor, we will be discuss how we can combat against urban sprawl in this meeting. As you know, Watersauga is growing at a rapid rate. We are now searching for ways to accomodate these new residents, without excessively to sprawl into the countryside. Remember, we do not want to make the same mistake as North America did.

So without further due, your task is simply help the council decide what is the most suitable choice for the city. Questions that can help you to this task is highlighted in PINK (like this one)!

We have come up with 3 solutions, from the most desirable to the least desirable.

1) Rebuild / Redevelopment. Older parts of the city has either been reserved (for heritage purposes) or stayed without redeveloping. These parts of the city exist in low density form, and occupies a big area of land. Some areas, for example, like highway interchanges, are wasting land space. Should we demolish and redevelop these areas?

2) Reclamation. Imitating what cities in China and Japan have been doing, we can fill up parts of the Pacific Ocean within the current city boundaries, and have new redevelopments there. We have done this before about 70 years ago, when a massive portion of the Pacific Ocean has been reclaimed into land. This massive portion is now home to what is now our downtown, about 80,000 commercial jobs reside there. The concern is the environment. Is this the proper option?

3) Sprawl into the farmlands. This is not what we what. But if no other solutions are deemed possible, this is what we would do.

4) Do you have any other ideas in mind?

SOLUTION 1 - REBUILD / REDEVELOPMENT

So before we discuss this option, we want you to keep our SMART GROWTH technology in mind. We started to adopt this technology about 80 years ago. During this 80 years, our urban area size increased by 17%, but on the other hand, our population grew by a whopping 300%. Smart Growth does make a difference.

2010-02-19213042.png

Figure 1.0.1 - Our first smart growth community, built about 80 years ago. Of course, the density has been increased from medium to high in the recent years. Notice that all ammenities are within walking distance. We encourage residents to either walk or take transit. In walking distance, you see parks, library branch, schools, police station, hospital, commercial areas (used to be shops, but redevelop several years ago). If a resident must travel outside the community, the area is served by 3 subway lines / rapid transit and bus routes.

1.1 - A real case recently

In late G.Y. 1, we noticed that a blotch of high-tech industrial land in the extreme northern end of the city was abandoned (as they could not find enough employees to work at their plants). We decided to dezone the area, and redevelop into another smart growth community.

2010-02-19212346.png

Figure 1.1.1 - Before the redevelopment. Notice the abandoned high tech industrial area.

2010-02-19215039.png

Figure 1.1.2 - New development. It took about a year for the community to completely flourish. Some of the residential developments exist in a density lower than what we expected, but it should be re-developed into higher density residential complex later on. The community is currently home to about 3,000 residents. As you can see, all ammenities are within walking distance, clinic, community school, train station, bus, and parks (shops are also in walking distance but not in the picture). Thru traffic is also discouraged to ensure transit usage.

1.2 - Ways to save space (Redevelopment)

2010-02-19213241.png

Figure 1.2.1 - Elevated rail interchange. This elevated rail section was among one of the busiest rapid transit line in the city (now overtaken by the new subway line built about 10 years ago, just one concession road south of this alignment).

The rapid transit line is now considered as a waste of space. Should we demolish the line and surrounding area, and redevelop it into higher density housing?

2010-02-19213720.png

Figure 1.2.2 - An older style train station. The train station has among one of the highest usage of the heavy rail line, spanning across the top of the city. But it is considered as a waste of space, spanning 3 x 2 tiles.

2010-02-19213756.png

Figure 1.2.3 - We have replaced the older train station with an on-track train station. We saved a lot of space, as well as bumped up the total capacity of the train station. The concern is, the new train station has no indoor building. How can we manage the number of passengers? Wouldn't this pose an inconvenience?

2010-02-19214935.png

Figure 1.2.4 - The usage of the above mentioned train station. It is severely overcrowded, at 495% of the capacity. We have already added two train stations nearby, but the capacity remained at around the same level.

2010-02-19214953.png

Figure 1.2.5 - The aforementioned new train station to relieve the stress of the older one.

2010-02-19214438.png

Figure 1.2.6 - These intechanges are also considered as a waste of space.

2010-02-19214425.png

Figure 1.2.7 - These interchanges are deemed to save more space. However, they can't deal with as much traffic as the proper interchanges. They sometimes cause congestions too. Which option should we use?

2010-02-19214527.png

Figure 1.2.8 - Ah. Movie Studios. True, they bring tourisms and everything. You might also spot a few stars on the streets. But, do they have practical uses? They are believed to be a waste of land. Should it be relocated and be redeveloped?

2010-02-19213455.png

Figure 1.2.9 - Like we mentioned before, some of the older communities exist in low density. They preserved our heritage and reminded us about our past. (The toll booth there is to discourage thru traffic, as the road is too narrow to handle high traffic). But should they be kept? Should they be demolished and redeveloped into high density zones?

SOLUTION 2 - RECLAMATION

We have done this before. It's not our first time.

2010-02-19213113.png

Figure 2.0.1 - This community (look at the housing along the road) is named Baie D'Coeur. The first subdivision built in Watersauga about 150 years ago. They are kept, untouched until today (though one house is demolished for a subway station). This used to be the shoreline of Old Watersauga. Anywhere south of here was plain ocean, yet about 20% of our population and 90% of our commercial jobs are south of here.

DowntownWatersauga.png

Figure 2.0.2 - This is posted in one of our previous entries. However, ALL OF THIS that you are seeing are located on reclaimed lands. It used to be a part of the Pacific Ocean.

2.1 - Proposed Reclaimed Site

2010-02-19213410.png

Figure 2.1.1 - We are planning to fill this bay in for future developments. If we do fill this bay in, we will receive more land for about 10,000 extra residents and about 10,000 extra commercial jobs. Land is good. But the thing is, it's not good for the environment. Should we do it?

SOLUTION 3 - URBAN SPRAWL

Not what we want here. But if nothing else deems possible, this is the way out.

Currently, farmland account to about 40% of our land. If we do the math properly, and if we develop all the farmland into residential housing, we could potentially double our current population. Is it worth it?

2010-02-19214834.png

Figure 3.0.1 - Imagine this piece of farmland, 100 years down the road. Will this piece of farmland be home to thousands of people?

SOLUTION 4 - YOUR OWN IDEA

So counsellors. Got a great idea in your mind to stop urban sprawling? Post a comment below. All counsellors here will be glad to explore and discuss your ideas. Remember, you may actually save us from urban sprawling!

-------------------------

SOLUTIONS AND CONSTRUCTIVE COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED! THANKS!

That's it for the 5th meeting! Please be prompt for the next meeting!

Regional Chair

Next Up: As the Highway Gets Closer to Elgin Mills... >>

(This topic will definitely on in our next post. Stay tuned!)

------------------------

P.S. Oh no, you guys can actually start rating me from the next entry. Please don't judge me on the graphics, please! Thanks all!

I want to get a high rating for the CJ... :)

Site Meter
Sign In to follow this  


4 Comments


Recommended Comments

I dont realy have a specific vote, I think option 2 (land reclaimation) should be done nomatter what... however, for whichever soulution is found out, i have an idea for each one....

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

(sorry, hit TAB button)

(side note..... i don't know if you use infinite money in your city or not, so alot of my plans could be pretty expensive, bear with me...also, these are kindof just the first ideas the poped into my head so some may be expensive as mantioned above)

Option1: rebuilding/redevelopment

Demolish the EL-Rail: yes. The El-Rail is a waste of space, demolish it. It would be better to make it into a subway and it would take up ALOT less space.

How can we solve the train station capacity problem? This ones kind hard. You can try and find a station with a capacity of over 9,000 people on the STEX, but I don't think there are any. Theres one with a 6,500 capacity (here) in that pack. You could also change the entire downtown rail system into a subway, but that would be REALY expensive, so that could be out of the question.

What to do with the Avenue-Highway interchanges? I would say that a highway in the middle of downtown should be changed to an elevated highway, however that could cost a pretty penny. I dont realy have other ideas....

What to do with the movie studios? Well it kindof depends if the studio wants to sell out or not. (im thinking in terms of natural growth) this option isnt rely decided by us city concillers, but be private buisness corperations. if the corperations have enough money, it may be enough money for the studios to leave.

Should we keep the "low density" historical communitys? This again depends on private developers abit, but also on the city. If the city gives the "go-ahead" on rezoneing the areas, then the small comunitys and "mom and pop" stores will DEFINITLY sell. Also, i noticed that the area in the pic is where the location of the land reclaimation project will be. if it happens, then the residents of those small mansions will probably leave because there is no sea side veiw, so....... if the land reclaimation project happens, id say to rezone it, if it dosnt, the other city concill members should realy NOT rezone the land and keep the area as a reminder of what the city once was.

Option 2/ Land Recaimation:

The land reclaimation would be great for the city's poulation, but could potentialy be devistating for the enviorment... however it depends on how large the reclaimation project is and..... wait........ this is REAL LIFE....not a perfect utopia..... the enviormental hippies have absalotly NO power ecept for free speech... the only real force is the sientific comunity.... they will have the final say... and they can be perswaded pretty easly for a little bit of salad, if you know what im saying..

Option 3: Urban Spralw:

Well.... im going to say yes. it would produce plenty of income from taxes and it will eventualy be developed anyway. Mabey not now however, in the future it could be developed.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

The rapid transit line is now considered as a waste of space. Should we demolish the line and surrounding area, and redevelop it into higher density housing? No. the elevated rail line should be kept, in order to accomidate for future growth, and avoid future congestion on the underground rail system/metro.

How can we manage the number of passengers? Wouldn't this pose an inconvenience? I would suggest that research is conducted into higher capacity rail stations for this area.

Which option should we use?  I believe that the original interchanges should be kept, due to their higher capacity, and also due to the fact that they r much safer for motorists.

But, do they have practical uses? I believe that the movie studies and  otehr similar structures should be kept due to their cultural and historical significance to the city, and also due to the bost the the citys commercial sector they provide due to the tourists that they attract to the city.

But should they be kept? Should they be demolished and redeveloped into high density zones? I belive that they should be preserved in their original condition due to their historical and cultural importance to the city.

Should we do it? I am totally against reclaiming more land from the ocean due to the negative effects this would have on the envirnoment. At the apsolute least, much more research and study must go into the environmental effects of this before it is even considered.

Is it worth it? I am in favour of relocating farms to more rural areas outside of the city, and redevelopeing the old farmland.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Sign In or register to comment...

To comment in reply, you must be a community member

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  

Register a New Account

×

Thank You for the Continued Support!

Simtropolis depends on donations to fund site maintenance costs.
Without your support, we just would not be in our 24th year online!  You really help make this a great community. *:thumb:

But we still need your support to stay online. If you're able to, please consider a donation to help us stay up and running. This helps sustain a platform where we can share our community creations for years to come.

Make a Donation, Get a Gift!

Expand your city with the best from the Simtropolis Exchange.
Make a Donation and get one or all three discs today!

STEX Collections

By way of a "Thank You" gift, we'd like to send you our STEX Collector's DVD. It's some of the best buildings, lots, maps and mods collected for you over the years. Check out the STEX Collections for more info.

Each donation helps keep Simtropolis online, open and free!

Thank you for reading and enjoy the site!

More About STEX Collections