-
Content Count
666 -
Joined
-
Last Visited
-
Most Liked
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Omnibus
News
Features
Downloads
City Journals
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by david1314
-
3 is indeed LCY. none of the rest.
-
Ok, time for three more. My guess is The_Hutt is out of town for christmas but will be back shortly. until then: These are all pretty easy 1. 2. 3. Good luck.
-
Version 1.0
3,363 Downloads
Ulvoybridge - Semi-functional This uses a lot and Glenni's Ulvoybridge model to simulate a bridge in-game rather than just be a decorative prop. With some careful modification to the lot properties, the game can be tricked into simulating a functional bridge. There are a few draw-backs, though these are common to all 'transit-enabled' lots. It is a street bridge, and will not allow freight trucks to cross. Buses, pedestrians, and cars can cross. The capacity is set at 400. Feel free to adjust any of these. The maximum slope has be set to 9000. This should be sufficient for most crossings, however, if the terrain too steep dialogue shows, increase both maximum slope before foundation and lot maximum slope with iLive's Reader.exe or SC4Tool (NOT IN LOT EDITOR, IT WILL CHANGE SOME SETTINGS ALLOWING BRIDGE TO FUNCTION!) ========== IMPORTANT: ========== In order for the bridge to behave properly, the two tiles end tiles on each side of the bridge MUST be completely flat and equal level on both sides of the bridge. To achieve this, I recommend first building a real bridge on the span and leveling the surrounding tiles to the bridge height by placing road tiles individually. The bridge must be placed on land, but does not need to cross water (i.e. you can cross a ravine or plop water with the bridge. The span is fixed, and the bridge totals 12 tiles long with a maximum span of 8 tiles. Unfortunately, because the original model was designed as a decorative prop rather than for this purpose, cars and pedestrians cannot be seen crossing. This is because the LOD was not designed to show this, and it continues to exclude items physically within the LOD. With proper adjustments to the model, this could be fixed. Dependency: Glenni's Ulvoybridge - https://www.simtropolis.com/STEX/index.cfm?id=20875 -
Originally posted by: Cockatoo-210893 This one gets me every time, gives you a sense of how damn tall the thing actually is... quote> The thing I take away from that picture is how damn close to vast expanses of endless cheap sandy land it is....and thus how pointless the building is. But then again, they have reclaimed land here. ...keeping in mind that the fundemental economics of a skyscraper is that it is less expensive to build UP than OUT. Every time I see a pic of the building or city I imigine the caption in massive white letters across the top, "ECONOMICS FAIL". If they could pack up and go, I'd call the whole city a circus, but unfortunately, the spectical is limited to those who find themselves living there. And like Wyoming, if you find yourself living in Dubai, it's because you don't know anything else of the outside world or something has gone horribly wrong in your life.
-
Originally posted by: irdesi berubium, you're right, it definitely is Pocatello. How in the world did you know that?!quote> Because it's the only other airport that has a runway 3/21 that has been shortened from it's original length and width and would have (jagged) mountains in the back. The western US hint was useless because you could tell decicively that it was US from runway markings and lighting, and that it was a narrow band between northern Wyoming and Canada with such mountains. From there it just involves searching United Express, Delta Express, and Fontier Express destinations for an airport with matching runway alignment and matching topography. Though, beyond that, it was a crapshoot if you searched United Destinations and came up with GTF: and or Delta destinations and came up with the correct answer Edit: on a second look, it looks like the pic showing the mountains above is in fact showing down 3 rather than 21...giving the wrong alignment.
-
I'm thinking that #1 is Great Falls International in Montana (GTF)
-
BREAKING NEWS: Gordon Brown saves the world
david1314 replied to toxicpiano's topic in Current Events
Originally posted by: Duke87 Stuttery fella, ain't he? What's most amusing, though, is how rowdy the room gets. Very unprofessional. Looks like something that would happen in a TV sitcom, not real life.quote> Some might call speaking freely in parliament a sign of healthy democracy. Ordered procedural bodies are entities better served rubber-stamping the business of the fascist state. And I might point out that speaking-out in parliament is decidedly more professional than claiming, in parliament no less, to have saved the world (a national parliament). Even in a slip of speech. This should be viewed as particularly unacceptable in a nation still recovering from it's image of believing itself-quite vocally-to have contributed the most to humanity of any nation. -
Lol, I was going to say it was BUF.... though I'm thinking that was in fact the original idea behind #3 as the pic came up in the search
-
Originally posted by: ch0c0 this also needs considerable work, but hopefully i get some time off over the holidays. quote> I really like the bridge, but the bricked texture on the cylindrical support looks strange. Part of it is definitely because it's such a large physical area in the render, and part of it is the masonry looks kind of strange in that capacity. Have you considered making it steel, concrete, or something else? Though, I'm not sure this helps with the problem of the large area in render. It's also got a lot of potential for some cool design work, or perhaps a steel super-structure with glassed in walkways for pedestrians sort of like Tower Bridge in London.
-
RSW (Edit: er... Ft. Meyers, or SW FL Regional) has concourses, so there is no gate 7 per se, and PVD would be my first guess too, but there's a gap between to the right of gate 7 as you look at the terminal from runway before (what I presume to be) gate 8. I'm thinking that the hint is that one or more airlines pictured no longer serves the airport. The list of airports served by Express Jet, Chautauqua, and Freedom Airlines (respective operators of ERJs for Continental Connex and Delta Connex) and Southwest is short maybe 5 airports (where adjacent gates are possible). And of those none seem to match the gate arrangement. Edit: kinda a long-shot guess, but RDU perhaps? Before the new terminal....and I guess it's by no means a 'smallish' airport.
-
Originally posted by: The_Hutt Nope, none of those.quote>Well, except for JFK of course
-
Originally posted by: The_Hutt I'm declaring #3 a wash. I went back to vet the photo and the airport is clearly different than what it was captioned as (the airport in question only has 2 jetBlue gates). Likely it's JFK but I'm not sure. #1 and #2 are still open.quote> I looked into this some. And I've found an edited version of the pic used in a Jan 2008 promotion for Boston Logan. It certainly is not Boston, however, because to get 4 jetblue gates in a row, we get a view across water to homes. Obviously not whats in pic 3. That said, the pic dates between 2005-2007 because there are E-190s in there and the pic was used for a news story in Jan 08. Also, the sun cannot cast that short of a shadow in Boston because the shadows would be slightly to the south based on the Gate positioning. I don't think that any other airport has the number of jetblue gates and also has snow. For it to be JFK, it looks like the pic was a north-viewing photo. In this case, the sun suggests it's probably about 8-9 am, which agrees with JFK's rush-hours. Without that, you would not have 4 consecutive gates used. Unfortunately, google maps satalite photo of JFK is almost perfectly vertical, so I can't see the distinguishing characteristics of the rather unique looking building. Go look at Google Maps to see each building clearly, but you can see that if the far E-190 were being pushed back, the pic lines up perfectly and matches as above. I don't think there's much chance that 3 is anywhere but JFK Edit: Oh, also, if it's not DAL or MDW, it can only be BWI for 1. And just to register another guess for 2, is it AUS or SAT?
-
Jo'burg, Yuma, and Kuala Lumpur were the correct answers.
-
Is #2 Nellis AFB, ABQ, Santa Barbara, or ELP? They're the only ones I can think of. I'm fairly certain it's not COS or old Stapleton because I don't recognize the mountains.
-
Originally posted by: The_Hutt Wow, that was fast. #3 (Reno) was pretty easy, #1 (Jakarta) was recognizable, but #2? Damn! I thought Diego Garcia was obscure.quote>Diego Garcia was exceptionally easy because of the B-52 fleet....in current colors....with a lagoon and ocean which you could tell was on a barrier island or atoll. If you happen to be privy to the fact that there are no AFB's on the east or gulf coast's barrier Islands, there's only about 4-5 other places in the world to check. You could narrow that down to 1-2 by looking at the foliage.
-
Originally posted by: randy60sdiego garcia?????quote> ...that was my first thought.
-
Sukarno Hatta International Airport is 1 in Jakarta
-
Originally posted by: caee8 Originally posted by: randy60s #1 is palm springs...you guys are way too far northquote> HOw look at the plane,the background.palm springs is no wayquote> *Giggles* the funny thing is that Randy was right.... Look at the terminal, the ground-cover between taxiways, the jagged 8,000 foot mountain... I'm certain that 1 is PSP and 2 is CUN (See here: http://www.johnnyjet.com/image/PicForNewsletterCancunNov2006AirportFromPlane.JPG) There we go... matching ridge with matching terminal.
-
Well, the photo is west-facing. Because the Nav lights are illuminated while the sun is still up and prior to the aircraft's departure, the captain expects it to darken. If it were morning, the pilot would not be operating them. BNA matches the terminal and topographical layout, but...apparently, it is not the largest in TN. BDL matches topo and building layout too, but Skywest doesn't fly there and as best I can tell, hasn't. DSM kinda fits the description, but has the wrong terrain around it. And SEA fits everything except the juxtaposition of the UAL and DAL aircraft ...beyond that, I'm spent on ideas. Edit: Oh, CLE
-
Originally posted by: The_Hutt Not Charlotte or Fargo. Originally posted by: david1314ABQ, BOI, BIL, FSD, and JACquote>None of these. Also, one of the assumptions in your post is faulty.quote> Is it SLC? Not SEA, terminal is wrong shape; not LAX, UAL and DAL don't share; not LAS (green); not PHX (see: LAS); not PDX UAL has exclusive terminal; not DEN (I live here and that's not here), It's not YEG or YYC cause there not in states, per se; I'm pretty confident in my exclusion of eastern cities, and it's certainly not OMH, ICT, or OKC, I'm not even going to start with where DFW is wrong,... That leaves SLC...but the terminal arrangement I'm looking at has the UAL aircraft on the wrong side for the picture angle. That is every single airport served by Skywest in Delta connex livery that is also the largest airport in the state....'cept ATL...which admittedly fits the bill....is it ATL? Edit: Damnit! The sun angle is wrong for both SLC and ATL.... both positions would be a north-facing photo....I guess that makes the PDX assumption the most tenuous. Is it PDX?
