Montu

Wow! This CJ is easily the best I've ever seen on here! Just one question where did you get this stadium that you used in the last 2 update? http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/6475/98338134.jpg Looking forward to seeing more update from you!

Hmm.. If u do fix it, you do NOT need to fix it for each "livery models" you made. Just simply make the fixed model your "defualt model" and just simply replace the livery and save as. Its simple.

^ He is correct, you need to have at least 7x7 tile then plop the plane, then you can reduce it to a 2x3 size.

Very nice! Looking real good. LAN has a really colorful livery!

Its looking real good! Just wondering, you gonna texture the wing and the elevators? Keep up the great work and we'll all have great variety of airplane types out, with my 767, your 777, Ace and Voltaire 747, Xiziz A320 and 737's If you need help, just PM me with it, I know whats causing the brightness problem and theres a really easy fix for it, so please MSN me or PM me. Thanks!

^ Its still fine the .Dat file is basically a compressed version of ALL the SC4model, so instead of 50 files, its only 2. Hope I helped.

There was a lot with 767 plopped but it was removed by the creator, so now there isn't any lots up for download. There was a planned one but was dropped as far as I know. I do not have the time to create 60+ lots so I just released them as props and allow people to create their own. If you ask nicely maybe They'll give you it.

No not really, just defending my position.

Ilikehotdog- it matters because JAL is KNOWN for its red tail, not orange tail. I am thankful for Voltaire work, I'm just pointing it out that it is odd that JAL is orange and thewing, as well as tail texture varies among planes. Boeing or Airbus doesnt produce 2 different wings for a type of plane, it isnt like, Oh do you want this kind of wing because it looks different than Airline B? The wing should look the same for a reason.... Nysc4- It has already been done - Look at the pics I posted, enough said. SpokaneFlyBoy- I have personally rendered a JAL 767, Even zoomed out, it does not even pose ANY problems at all. Compared to this what he calls JAL, I just cannot understand why, - it does not shout for attention the way a pure RGB red would. Colors that distract from their surroundings are not a good thing, I feel they show a lack of concern for users who will need to view them repeatedly in their cities. When you clearly can see that the 767 with the correct red does not do above, as well as, - at higher zoom levels this color is still unobtrusive, even with SC4's habit of over-concentrating and brightening colors at a distance. Not even a problem as well. Just download the pack from devotion if you still don't believe me. So I just cannot understand why it isn't in its ICONIC color, its like calling US West in total blue color because "Black was too "distracting." It just does not make sense at all. Right now it is like United in White, British Airways in Black, or Virgin Atlantic in Purple. It does not make sense, All the other airline is in its respective color, heck even Northwest is RED and Voltaire is telling us red will distracts us? When he clearly made Northwest red. I just don't get it.... JAL should be in its respective color and not another one, peroid. I'm not even doing this to get out at him because I love his airport pack, I'm just pointing out this fact thats all. This pack has been dissapointing to me, you think all this time they had, they would had gotten everything right but instead, there are missing textures on wings and tail as well as JAL being in the wrong color. Sorry but it is dissapointing for me. I don't really care if anybody flames me for this, I'm stating the TRUTH and asking him to correct it.

^ That was actually mine. I edited the base texture to match the old texture because I found the dark grey unrealstic and screws up the uniformity of the airport, so I edited the lot to match the old airport textures. If you want it, gimme a PM with your MSN and I can give it over. Don't get this the wrong way, you've done a incredible job on this but, I admit you might know a lot about choosing color, but JAL is worldwide known for their red tail and instead of that you choose Orange, something that is not a signature of JAL. This is the part I don't understand how y ou could do this. Its like removing JAL signature and replacing it with something else. Also, I don't really think they'll distract viewers, It is just a red on the tail, every airline worldwide does this to attract attention, everytime a plane pass by, if you only look at the tail, you can accurately guess what airline that aircraft belongs to because the tail in sense is their signature. As well as if you thought the red was distracting, then why didn't you "Orangazize" the Northwest plane? it is red as well. You couldv'e used the same red as Northwest to preserve JAL iconic color. But again, its your lot, your decision. Great job on it regardless.

Hello, GREAT work on this release, the 747 does look very SC4ish and realstic. I will most def. be using this in my new airport. But also, I also hate to be the bearer of bad news, But I noticed soemthing in this pack that could be a possible render error. 1. The tail wing texture varies on each planes and it looks incomplete to me, 2. The wing texture on each plane is also different. 3. JAL is..... Orange??? (JAL is red.) I don't know what happened here. it is possible that it is a render error that you have overlooked, it happens to the best of us sometimes. Another thing is that I noticed Lufhanasia texture is noticable lighter than the rest. is this intentional or just by accident? I would like to see the tail and wing texture to be fixed if it is indeed wrong. If it is not wrong, then could you explain why each planes has a noticably different tail and wing texture than other planes?

Pilotdaryl- It is more like 3-4 days to ASSEMBLE the planes since parts are made from all over the world. No plane can be made from stratch in 3 days. Boeing flies all the part to Everett Field then when all the part is there, then yes 3-4 days to assemble, not really amazing since its like a puzzle, just put slot a into slot b then you got a plane. How deep- That infomation is incorrect. Boeing is sending their FIRST 7, 787, there to solve the weight issue and flight testing so the assembly line in seattle is not interuptted. Makes sense since you dont really want a 787 taking up space at their plant and interuppting operations. They are sending the first 7 there since they are overweight and they have to figure out how to trim the weight off. As well as the military has NOT ordered any 787.

hym... Actually the video only showed First and buisness class, the place where the majority of us will NOT fly in.... Cattle class will be 9 across, so it is going to be 3-3-3 layout. It'll be similar to any other aircraft we fly in. As well those seats were designed by Boeing to show customers mock up what it CAN look like, it doesn't mean airlines will have that exact seat in their aircraft. Remember when the A380 came out and people said there would be shopping malls, swimming pools, casinos, etc etc, so far no airlines opted for that. Emigrates is even planning a 10 across 3-4-3... I wouldnt want to be seated in the middle of the 4... Ouch. Micah- The A380 is also revolutionizing as the 787. I am a Boeing fan, but to say the A380 is not revolutionizing would be incorrect. It has many many new features and technologies. As well the double ddeck is a wonder in all by itself, Imagine the designing phase when they had to create a wheel structure strong enough to withstand that HUGE beast POUNDING on the pavement of the runway at 120+ MPH. As well as the second floor support to keep it from collapsing as well. I would say the 380 is equally impressive, they started designing it back then in the 1985-8* I do not remember the exact year. As well as they will have 5+ cameras placed around the aircraft for the captain to steer it. Just take ONE look at this, http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0989940/M/ As well as the very noticable wing bend to hold up the engine weight, http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1214542/M/ This is one impressive beast as well.

You gonna release that 777-300?

Hello, Like Za had said, they were removed from the stex (Which i found out about today... Wasn't informed) can be located at the LEX, which is here, https://www.sc4devotion.com/csxlex/lex_filedesc.php?lotGET=878