Jump to content

45 posts in this topic Last Reply

Highlighted Posts

24 minutes ago, jeffryfisher said:

BTW, at 357 MB, and with many people wanting it at the same time, these NAM releases would be decent candidates for bittorrent. By torrenting, each downloader becomes another server, relieving hosts of much bandwidth strain, especially during the initial rush.

There is a good reason to avoid that: by every reciever becoming another server, the control of the available releases becomes impossible for the NAM Team, and to offer support to the current version and all of the others that are still being distributed by torrents is ostensibly more difficult.

Also, there is a better reason: there is a verbal accord to not distribute anything based on Maxis' material by peer-to-peer media, as it fringes on an illegal activity.

As you can see, the initial rush for NAM 36 came and went without plunging out any of the dedicated sites, so bandwidth issues on the supply side aren't really pressing right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed, in a short space of time the bandwidth issue seems to be less of a problem these days than it ever was. Partially that's because there are less people I suspect playing SC4, but also in the ever more connected world, the cost of data/bandwidth are becoming more reasonable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The possibility of using the "t-word" to distribute was actually discussed internally when we went to the "monolithic" NAM package for NAM 31.  We decided against it for the two reasons @matias93 described.  We became particularly invested in ensuring that old versions did not remain easily accessible, after a massive tech support headache back in 2007, when we got flooded with users trying to use brand-new NAM 21 addons with freshly-downloaded copies of NAM 20.

-Tarkus

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, jeffryfisher said:

Aha, that explains why an old NAM download page was updated rather than a new download created for (and labeled as) NAM 36.

Indeed--and if anyone's curious to see what the sort of fallout of that NAM 21/NAM 20 mix-and-match conflict looked like, it starts here.  It brought the dreaded "red arrow" to the forefront (which our monolithic package has virtually eliminated).  The images, when they were still there, really underscored it.

In case anyone is wondering what the stats are with the downloads, in the past week, NAM 36 has gotten just shy of 1800 downloads across all three distribution sites, presently averaging about 256 per day.  About 52% of those downloads have been off the STEX, 28% from ModDB, and 20% from the LEX.  Release day saw about 378 downloads.  ModDB is probably shouldering about an equal bandwidth load to ST, however, as it's the one site with the Mac version (which is about twice the size of the Windows version).

By comparison, in years past, we'd be between 700-1000 downloads per day right in the wake of release, and that average would fall down to about 250 per day a few months after release.  Based on current trends, we're probably going to fall to somewhere around 100-150 per day once things settle.  No one site is shouldering more than 100 per day the past couple days.

-Tarkus

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been trying to familiarize myself with the new NAM - so is there a trick to doing ERRW (draggable, NAM 36)?  I am getting odd gaps where the elevated rail is just not being used.  I did read the docs and it said something about placing a rail piece over non-rail networks, but I've done that and I still get gaps in usage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know where to post it but it's a tangential NAM issue : a lot of rail stations lots have been included in the NAM 36 and automatically show up with the right RRW rail textures. There is an NDEX-DuskTrooper one I like a lot and I wonder if it could be included in the next NAM iteration -- or if someone from the NAM"s team could do something for it -- if anything is possible ; somehow I doubt it, as the rail texture seems to be part of the building, but one never knows, with the miracles accomplished these days with SC4 stuff... *:ohyes:

NDEX%20Manta%20Station%20-%20copie-L.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/03/2018 at 1:00 AM, RobertLM78 said:

I am getting odd gaps where the elevated rail is just not being used.

It would be helpful if you could give us a specific example where this occurs. Did you use DrawPaths to check the pathing was correct?, that's usually the most common reason for broken sections.

7 hours ago, tariely said:

a lot of rail stations lots have been included in the NAM 36 and automatically show up with the right RRW rail textures

This isn't really accurate, although that may be how things seem.

Any stations included with the NAM were done so as part of the SLURP process. That is with the exception of updates to the Maxis stations and those selectable in the NAM installer. SLURP in essence looks to update the modding of a number of popular transit stations on the exchanges. But these updates are tightly centred on things like transit switches, to ensure optimal station usage and inter-operability in-game.

  • These updates will only be installed when users have already installed the original station.
  • Such updates do not alter the textures on the lot. I.e., if RRW textures appear, it's because other things are making that happen.
    For example, any lots that use the default Maxis ortho rail overlay will be updated the RRW using NAM included overrides. It should be noted though that the NAM overrides will only ever cover those textures included by Maxis and in the NAM. For everything else, you will need to resort to third part mods, where available.
7 hours ago, tariely said:

don't know where to post it but it's a tangential NAM issue

That's not really the case here, the NAM project simply can not cover all 3rd party stations or mods. We're a very small team, but even so, the buck has to stop somewhere.

In the specific case of rails being modded as part of a station, whilst it's technically possible to alter, it's hugely time consuming and specialised work. Also the results are rarely great, especially for lower zooms. If one had access to the original modelling files used to make it, then changing it would be much quicker. Honestly, I wish people wouldn't BAT such textures in, it makes no sense when a LE texture can do the job quicker and more flexibly. In any case, such modifications are well outside of the scope of the NAM mod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of these old lots do indeed have baked-in textures - which means until re-rendered they won't make the grade. For this one I've edited the Zoom 3,4 FSH and the station is relotted to have a RRW overlay. It looks like this - optically good until a train passes through - when you'll see weirdness because the LODs on the models are not changed.

 NDEX_MANTA.jpg.4f75bb53d339b1e186afb6f86f14222b.jpg

Unzip attached file into the same place that you have the Original NDEX Lot. Will not work without.

DTB_TR_UHP_MANTA_1x3S_RRWPatched.zip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, tariely said:

I should check the list of the updated stations --must be somewhere in the NAM readme ?

Actually I doubt there is one in the documentation. It's a seamless feature, you get the updates if you have the relevant stations installed. It was not thought that users would specifically install the stations which had been updated, so listing them just never seemed hugely necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh. So how do we know which are "the most popular" stations ? I don't know for instance is my "populars" are yours, or rivit's or anyone else's... (And I installed NAM 36 in my Work Folder, i.e. not my Game Folder, i.e. no rail stations (or any other) installed. I got the ones I checked during the install -- mostly EL Rail and monorail -- but...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, rsc204 said:

It would be helpful if you could give us a specific example where this occurs. Did you use DrawPaths to check the pathing was correct?, that's usually the most common reason for broken sections.

Thanks for the response!  I am beginning to think it's just the nature of the city.  There is a tram system as well, built before any RW stations, that is getting good usage.  I checked the paths and with the cheat toggled on, there were complete orange lines to signify the rail paths (no breaks).  However when I tried to toggle off the cheat (i.e. 'Drawpaths off'),  the paths were still there mostly (all networks).   The interesting thing is that three ERRW bridges (two avenue crossings and a road crossing)  were missing the orange pathing.  I'm not sure if that's a result of attempting to toggle off the cheat, or if it's an indicator of a problem with the network.  After having playing around with that cheat, I'm assuming that there is no real way to turn it off, and saving even with it toggled off has the regional view all colourful from the paths XD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RobertLM78 said:

I'm assuming that there is no real way to turn it off

to turn paths on - drawpaths,  off hidepaths  

if the paths don't link up after you have dragged the network through the ERRW viaducts they may actually be missing - do you have RUM for RRW v5 installed? this has corrections and extensions for the ERRW network made after NAM36 was released.

If the problem persists after that we'll need to check the files themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rivit said:

do you have RUM for RRW v5 installed? this has corrections and extensions for the ERRW network made after NAM36 was released

Okay, had to go check - I have downloaded it but hadn't installed it yet.  I think I was a bit intimidated so I hadn't messed with it yet - so are you saying that there is something broken with vanilla ERRW in NAM36?  I will install shortly and see how that goes.  Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, tariely said:

So how do we know which are "the most popular" stations ?

The point is, you don't have to. IF you have a station we've updated installed, you get the patch for it. But if not, you don't need them.

We never thought users would be basing their decisions on which stations to install, on those which were patched. I literally don't have a list I can just copy/paste here. If you are really keen to know, take a look inside the NAM installer (You can open it with 7zip as an Archive), the following folder; $[125]\MTA Station Overrides\, contains all such fixes.

Bear in mind you'll find 4x each lot here and each file has an identical file name used in the original lot, so it won't necessarily be obvious in all cases what station/creator is might be.

14 hours ago, tariely said:

(And I installed NAM 36 in my Work Folder, i.e. not my Game Folder, i.e. no rail stations (or any other) installed. I got the ones I checked during the install -- mostly EL Rail and monorail -- but...)

If you don't use the installer as intended, you can't expect things like this to work. Indeed, if you install NAM outside of the location where such stations reside, it won't see them and will not install the patches. Similarly, it might see stations you don't have in your Game folder, but do in the Work folder. So it installs parts of lots you won't actually be using, which leads to problems. Perhaps the cause of the issue with the SG stations?

However, you can't expect the NAM team to reasonably support you if you are using such custom setups. My advice would be to move the NAM folders before installing then move them back afterwards. Bear in mind, you might need different NAM installs for different setups, it really depends on how your system works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, RobertLM78 said:

The interesting thing is that three ERRW bridges (two avenue crossings and a road crossing)  were missing the orange pathing.

Using a test setup of NAM 36, I checked the OxO ERRWxAve and ERRWxRoad crossings for both L1 and L2. Not only were the paths there (RHD tested), but automata were using them in addition to rail passengers without issue.

12 hours ago, RobertLM78 said:

However when I tried to toggle off the cheat (i.e. 'Drawpaths off')...

At this point all paths should disappear from the display. If not, try changing zoom or rotation, which should refresh your display. Some GPUs/Drivers will do this automatically better than others.

It doesn't matte which paths you see when you've toggled Drawpaths Off, only that they are correct when it's toggled On, anything else could not be trusted as data.

7 hours ago, RobertLM78 said:

so are you saying that there is something broken with vanilla ERRW in NAM36?  I will install shortly and see how that goes.  Thanks!

Pathing wise, no there shouldn't be (unless @rivit's caught something I missed [or forgot about *:???:]). Especially regarding the ERRW, I verified all pathing personally, so unless you can show me a specific example that's broken, I'd have to assume they are not. There were some tweaks, but to my knowledge most of them were cosmetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, rsc204 said:

It doesn't matte which paths you see when you've toggled Drawpaths Off, only that they are correct when it's toggled On, anything else could not be trusted as data.

And indeed they were - so I suspect it's just the circumstances of the city.  I guess if it persists over the next couple cities then we can assume it isn't just circumstance of layout.    Before checking with drawpaths I had just built a PP viaduct instead, which was seeing usage (of course that could just be good ol' SC4 quirkiness).   I feel confident enough to move forward, and absolute worst case scenario I build PP viaducts and worry about draggle only for the (diagonal) crossing I'm working on, which I can get back to now that I feel like I've familiarized myself with RRW.  :}

Good to hear there weren't any problems 'out of the box', too.  *;)

 

Thanks @rivit - nice work on the modd - looks great!  *:thumb:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@rsc204 You say :  If you don't use the installer as intended, you can't expect things like this to work. Indeed, if you install NAM outside of the location where such stations reside, it won't see them and will not install the patches. Similarly, it might see stations you don't have in your Game folder, but do in the Work folder. So it installs parts of lots you won't actually be using, which leads to problems. Perhaps the cause of the issue with the SG stations?

Indeed. After I posted my question, I arrived (belatedly, but better late than never) at the right conclusion : I should (re)Install NAM 36 in my game folder.  And you confirm it.*:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Further work with the draggable ERRW network has convinced me that there is indeed something wrong.... further, I think more specifically it is the draggable crossings that are the culprit. 

I had built a completely draggable network which, unlike the last place, was a network which lent itself to reasonable usage.  As soon as I tore down (most of) the draggable network and rebuilt it with puzzle pieces the network was seeing very good usage.   I purposely left a small section near the edge with a draggable crossing.   No sim yet is using the track with the crossing, though I plan on replacing it momentarily to see if that changes things. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to rack my brains as to why there would be a problem, despite the pathing and other related parts all being in place. This is frankly beyond my skills with transport modding to explain, perhaps @Tarkus or @Eggman121 may have some ideas given their better understanding of the inner workings.

I did extensively test the pathing, because I was heavily involved in a major RRW overhaul, but by testing, I only visually checked they all existed. Any actual traffic/UDI testing was rather minimal by comparison. However, if you can use the UDI and drive a train along the problematic sections, they should in theory work as a rail network. But I would also have thought by now if there were some deep functional issues, we'd have received more reports of them. As such, I have to ask:

  • What version of SC4 are you running, Disk or Digital?
    • If Disk do you have both the official patches and run from the disk itself?
    • If Digital, is it the borked Origin version or a properly patched 641 edition?

I'm sure you can understand that before spending ages poking down the rabbit hole, we need to be certain your game is working properly first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, rsc204 said:

However, if you can use the UDI and drive a train along the problematic sections, they should in theory work as a rail network. But I would also have thought by now if there were some deep functional issues, we'd have received more reports of them

Unfortunately, I'd never tried UDI with a draggable network, but I can attest to automata not having any difficulties, as I have freight and passenger rail automata generators which I used in the first city with a draggable network.  Other than the usual necessity to save and exit before the trains will actually travel through the stations, the automata generators and resulting automata work fine, crossing all crossings without issue.  However, as we know, actual usage was zero. 

6 hours ago, rsc204 said:

What version of SC4 are you running, Disk or Digital?

  • If Disk do you have both the official patches and run from the disk itself?
  • If Digital, is it the borked Origin version or a properly patched 641 edition?

 

I run Disk version, fully patched to 640 (so working nightlights). 

6 hours ago, rsc204 said:

I'm sure you can understand that before spending ages poking down the rabbit hole, we need to be certain your game is working properly first.

Definitely understand *:D

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, RobertLM78 said:

Further work with the draggable ERRW network has convinced me that there is indeed something wrong.... further, I think more specifically it is the draggable crossings that are the culprit. 

I had built a completely draggable network which, unlike the last place, was a network which lent itself to reasonable usage.  As soon as I tore down (most of) the draggable network and rebuilt it with puzzle pieces the network was seeing very good usage.   I purposely left a small section near the edge with a draggable crossing.   No sim yet is using the track with the crossing, though I plan on replacing it momentarily to see if that changes things. 

You have to use the rail tool and click on the crossings for the automata to use the ERRW. This is due to needing a rail code in the piece.... Just like the level crossings.

So all you have to do is place a blank rail tile on the crossing networks and the passenger automata will start using the network.

Please Refer to this video...

-eggman121 (NAM Team member)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Eggman121 said:

So all you have to do is place a blank rail tile on the crossing networks and the passenger automata will start using the network

I thought that was the case - it may well be I missed some odd road or street crossing.    I'll keep faffing with it *;)

Thanks!  :thumb:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I am new to this forum but was wondering where I could purchase a copy of SimCity 4 Deluxe that will be compatible with the NAM?,

I understand that the Steam version no longer supports the NAM,

Please do let me know as I am unsure and really want to play the game without the terrible traffic issues,

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  

Register a New Account

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By paeng
      Okay, riding the wave... ;-) so you can all use the fabulous props just released by Shok, here is a whole range of ready made parking lots for many occasions - small, medium and large, straight and diagonal orientation, with different pavements and accessories for $, $$ and $$$ areas, COM as well as IND... All the lots have Park'n'Ride functionality and provide a small income (Business Deal) to compensate for your valuable real estate.
       
      * Allow some loading time for the second screenshot - it's an animation showing the change of vehicles during the course of a day...
       
       
       
      LIST OF ITEMS
       
      Small - 14 lots
      (1x1, 1x2, 2x1)
       
      Medium - 6 lots
      (2x2, 2x3, 3x2, 3x3, 4x4)
       
      Large - 4 lots
      (6x2, 6x3, 6x6, 7x4)
       
       
       
      DEPENDENCY
       
      SHK Parking Pack
       
       
       
      DEVELOPER NOTES
       
      All lots come in various configurations and are kept in separate files so you can easily select and install just your favorites. Move any lot you do not want to use out of your Plugins to a safe location.
       
      All cars are timed prop-families, so you get a lot of variety and 'movement' during a day. If a lot seems to have too many repetitions, bulldoze and re-plop for a different mix until satisfied.
       
      The pieces are located in the 'Transport | Miscellaneous' menu with custom icons.
       
      You'll notice that the ingame menu indicates things like $, $$ or $$$, IND or COM, straight or diagonal - this is not so much saying where you should use a particular lot, but wether it uses plain concrete, more fancy accessories, straight or diagonal parking bays and so on... Of course you can use any of the lots wherever you feel they'll fit in.
       
      All parking lots need a little power and generate very slight pollution. The values (including plop cost and monthly income) depend on the size of the lot (see ingame menu for more details).
       
       
       
      Note1: THERE ARE TWO *OPTIONAL* MODS INCLUDED!
       
      1) For all who do not care for the extra income there is a small (optional) mod that will cancel out the business deal from every lot.
       
      2) For all who prefer to have visually transit-enabled driveways there is another (optional) mod which does just that.
       
      Both mods are packed in additional ZIP files (included in this download). Unpack and install these additional ZIPs ONLY IF -
       
      * you DO NOT want the lots to generate income; and/or
      * you DO want transit-enabled driveways.
       
      If you are happy with the default lots, store the optional ZIPs in a safe location (together with the documentation).
       
       
      Note2: A word about the 'SHK Parking Pack' - this will be my 'standard' dependency for all my cars and parking textures needs in future lotting projects. Don't hesitate to install it - you'll get good use out of it :-)
       
       
       
      INSTALLATION
       
      Put the whole bundle into "(My )Documents\Plugins". You may of course opt to install only certain items - just remove any lot(s) you do not wish to use - but make sure you always keep the Resource file (KEEP_parking_resource.dat) installed.
       
      If you install the optional mods, keep them in the same folder as the core lots, but maintain the provided z_folders. The mods must load AFTER the core lots.
       
      To un-install - bulldoze all lots you may have plopped from this pack, then remove it completely from your Plugins.
       
       
       
      SUPPORT
       
      Should you need support for these items please visit the
      Nightowl Support Thread
       
       
      Enjoy!
    • By uroncha
      Brand-New RoadTop Subway-Bus station include Diagonal and Intersection.
       
      Bus Stop (12 Lots)
      Street: Straight,Diagonal,T Intersection,X Intersection
      Road: Straight,Diagonal,T Intersection,X Intersection
      Oneway Road: Straight,Diagonal
      Avenue: Straight,Diagonal
       
      Subway-Bus Station (8 Lots)
      Road: Straight,Diagonal,T Intersection,X Intersection
      Oneway Road: Straight,Diagonal
      Avenue: Straight,Diagonal
       
      Option: EuroRoad Texture
      Dependence: none
    • By hugues aroux
      For my first plugin, I owe my inspiration to that of Uroncha in 2005 (see here) which I used until now. And for which I wanted to bring my personal touch.
      So I suggest you the same with newer Props. A big thank you to Namspopof, jth876, Giraffe, Vnaoned, Mcdrye, Rivit, the SFBT team and all the props authors used here.
      12 Bus stop.
      On street and road ortho, diagonal, and intersections (T and X).
      On one way ortho and diagonal.
      On ortho and diagonal avenue.
      8 metro stations (+ bus)
      On ortho, diagonal and intersection roads (T and X).
      On one-way, ortho, diagonal avenue.
      The T and X bus stations, can be placed along residences, with full acess!!
      You have the choice of the texture for the streets: NAM or Tar-sealed street of Rivit ; and for roads: NAM Euro or NAM US.
       
      The capacity of the bus stop:
      Street: 17000+ ; Road and oneway: 17000+ ; Avenue: 20000.
      The capacity of the metro stations:
      Road, one-way, avenue: 24000+.
       
      These lots appear in the menu: miscellaneous transports.
      Installation
      Place the contents of the Zip into your Plugins directory.
      In the subdirectory: scoty_bus_A_textures /, depending on NAM settings or other ..., delete one of the two files scoty_bus_tex_road_XX.dat, as well as one of the two scoty_bus_tex_street_nnnn.dat. Keep, of course, the file scoty_bus_tex.dat (!) Which gathers avenue and oneway textures. 
      Dependencies
      It goes without saying that you have the plugin "All maxis building props with proper names" or the two files "bldgprop_vol1 & vol2".
       
      ·         Nams PROPS PACK Vol 2
      ·         French Road Signs.dat
      ·         Urbanpack.dat
      ·         SFBT_Haltestellen_Fluggi_khoianh_Props.dat
      ·         SFBT_Khiyana_Props.dat
      ·         VV_Propspack vol. 1
      ·         Grfe_props_pack_LE_lupins
      ·         Grfe_props_pack_LE_cypresses
      ·         Grfe_props_pack_LE_berries
      ·         Grfe_props_pack_LE_maples
      ·         SubwayProps, you can keep only the model:
      RoadsideSubstairs_Mcdrye_0x33317b90.SC4Model
      And the prop : RTMTV3_PropF_Subway_Mcdrye_SteelBlue.dat
      ·         Modern Realistic Subway Station V2, you can keep only the files:
      subwayiiredotextureattempti-0x5ad0e817_0x39671410_0x30000.SC4Model
      subwayiiredotextureattempti-0x6534284a-0x99472a58-0x796b3c63.SC4Desc

      Good game !
    • By Tarkus
      As of just now, the current documentation for the NAM has been uploaded to the SC4 Devotion server, with the intent of making it easier to reference.  It also has a fairly easy to remember URL, too:

      http://sc4devotion.com/namdoc

      -Tarkus
    • By Angry Mozart
      Hello everyone.
      Welcome to my BAT orchestra. Please take a seat  'cause this symphony is about to start!
      In this thread I'll show you some of the other projects I'm working on (besides of my freight train prop pack).  I want/need this space because sometimes I'm working on several things at the same time, and I thought it would be more comfortable to have all that in just one place, as many batters do.
      My finished projects are:
      Ok, enough introduction for now, let get this symphony begin!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Thank You for the Continued Support!

Simtropolis relies mainly on member donations to continue operating. Without your support, we just would not be able to be entering our 15th year online!  You've really help make this a great community.

But we still need your support to stay online. If you're able to, please consider a donation to help us stay up and running, so that we can help keep bringing SimCity players together to share our creations.

Make a Donation, Get a Gift!

Expand your city with the best from the Simtropolis Echange.
Make a donation and get one or all three discs today!

stexcollection-header.png

By way of a "Thank You" gift, we'd like to send you our STEX Collector's DVD. It's some of the best buildings, lots, maps and mods collected for you over the years. Check out the STEX Collections for more info.

Each donation helps keep Simtropolis online, open and free!

Thank you for reading and enjoy the site!

More About STEX Collections