• Moose
  • Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Interview with the Synekism Team


    We had a chance to catch up with the guys behind Synekism, a city simulation game focused on dynamically generated content. Check out our last interview with them here, and read on to see how things have progressed.

    1. So, it's been a year since we last talked to you, what's the state of Synekism today, compared to one year ago?

    Unfortunately (or fortunately), since May of 2011 we've mostly done research. Of the work we did do, most was code sanitation and only some went towards user-visible features. Our feature creep has therefore turned into a feature drought. That said, I think it was a necessary slowdown, with the thinking-to-doing ratio almost ready to favour doing.

    On a factual user-visible level, we've added lot density controls, a ray-traced screenshot feature, camera alignment controls, data maps for density and land value, a new zoning layout which attempts to keep lots perpendicular to their road, and buildings no longer take up the entire lot. Synekism, however, is still very much in the early alpha stage.

    We've also lost a team member bringing the count down to two. Nothing to worry about though.

    2.What kind of traction have you picked up in the community? And has the feedback you've received to date shaped your project in any way?

    Our website host hasn't complained yet about bandwidth spikes but I'd say we've gained a fair amount of attention, especially considering the limited state of Synekism. We'd like to especially thank those few very persistent players that have provided most of the feedback. It was no viral social trend but I think we did ok and it seems to be stable.

    Feedback has definitely shaped Synekism in the past year. The best example was the multiplayer feature. We didn't even finish it before we were told it was NOT something we should focus on. It was a "cool" feature that people would "try" but would never become an integral part of the game. However, most of the feedback that improves Synekism at the moment is bug discovery since there isn't much depth yet.

    I should add that besides feedback we got a tonne of suggestions and ideas that will certainly shape Synekism in the future.


    A Work in Progress: Buildings in Synekism


    Density Map

    3. So you relented on the multiplayer feature from the community feedback. How did you see multiplayer playing out? What were the high-level mechanics or concepts you had at the time?

    We basically wanted to make it possible for two or more people to work on the same city at the same time. This would have been in real time. When your friend deleted all the roads (because he wasn't your friend) they would disappear from your copy of the city as well and in that instant. It would have been similar to a real-time strategy multiplayer game. The primary inspiration for our little multiplayer excitement was that we used to compete in SimCity, the challenge usually being first to a million population or something arbitrary like that.

    In retrospect, our little skirmishes were not a major part of our city simulation fun, and even so, it was just as much fun without a network connection as it would have been with it. Maybe we'll explore multiplayer later on but for now we're sticking to single player.



    A Zoomed-Out Look at Zones in Synekism


    4. Did the announcement of the new SimCity have any effect on your development (goals, direction)?

    We obviously can't compete with a giant like SimCity head-on. It wasn't so much a problem when we were competing with a 9 year old game but -1 year olds present some challenge. So, yes, we're still processing the news and changing our long term priorities accordingly. The goal is to further define the unique aspects of Synekism, like procedural buildings, and introduce additional fundamental differences into the mix. It might blow up in our face but we might as well take advantage of the "indie" development freedoms.

    The announcement was also partly responsible for our recent break of tradition and pause from monthly releases. We'll be working over the summer to address some of the goals stated above and will return on September 1, 2012. But written updates should continue throughout.


    5. We have been learning how GlassBox is an "agent-based" simulation. Can you tell us a bit about Synekism's intended simulation engine and how it might be the same or different?


    I think I'm just at the point now where I know enough computer science to partially grasp the magnitude (just the magnitude) of GlassBox's complexity. This is clearly something a few years old with parents way smarter than myself. Based just on that I can assure you Synekism's engine will not be similar if it tried.

    That said, one of the concepts we're playing with and will try to prototype over the summer is planet-sized city areas. Not regions, but continuous, no-loading-screens, buildable, planet-sized areas. Keep in mind I had the words "playing with", "try to", and "prototype" in the same sentence. My point is that we're going macro and agent-based simulation will probably not work well on the scales we're after. Therefore, Synekism will focus on statistically driven simulations. The details are still blurry right now though (as in, we have no clue).

    6. Sounds ambitious, we'd love to know what you've come up with over the summer. So, I noticed in March you guys started a company, Idimoris. To me, it looks like an indication that Synekism might be moving out of the side-project and into a more full-time venture, is that accurate? Is the company being backed? Any plans on building the team further? 

    Idimoris was actually started before we launched. It was just the name of our "registered" general partnership as we didn't have the money nor was it worth incorporating at the time. It's still a partnership today (with one less partner). The website came about because someone generously volunteered his design talent. It was also not a bad idea to have something at www.idimoris.com since Synekism's publisher meta data says: Idimoris.

    Unfortunately, none of us can commit to Synekism full-time for the next couple of years due to either full-time work or school, because we are our own and only backers, so it will technically remain a side-project. This might also be the place to address a common suggestion we get which is to put the project up on Kickstarter. It's a valid course of action and we might get enough to not starve while we work on Synekism full-time for a while. The plan would be to get Synekism up to what we call "pay-worthiness" faster and start living off the project. However, and to be honest, as much as I love this genre and this project, I also like my full-time (9 to 5) job which not only gives me better odds against starvation but also exposes me (having just graduated) to seasoned industry talent that easily carries over to the Synekism project. My partner is in a similar position. Therefore, accepting any financial backing right now would be inappropriate since it won't really speed up development.

    Regarding the team, unless we come across a really dedicated programmer or designer that would be fine working for the sake of the work alone, I don't think it will grow within the perceivable future. Real growth would have to wait until we have a more solid direction.

    7. And lastly, what are some of your goals over the next few months? Anything else you'd like to add, share or hint at? Thanks for taking the time, we'll catch up with you again!


    Well, both of us will have some serious time off this summer (like a month) and our work load in general has just halved so we hope to get some serious work done. The planet idea I mentioned earlier is our first tackle as we'll try to see how crazy it really is. The planet push will also force a new save file. We're actually looking at adopting a serious database engine for our saves (probably Firebird). The UI needs to be re-done as we have too many short-cut keys and often avoid new feature because they would require UI changes. Our graphics engine also needs some attention. Forcing you to stare at boxes is just cruel without so much as shadows or anti-aliasing. These are some of the main goals for the September re-launch and the rest of the year but I cannot commit to anything at the moment until I get to work and see which of them are insane and which are border-line insane to implement. Moving forward, we will of course post updates on the 1st of each month on our progress.

    We haven't done as much in the past year as I had hoped. I wish I can promise 2012 will be better but I've learned my lesson with promises like that. All I can say is that the project is alive and well and that I'm as curious about where we'll be by the end of the summer as anyone else.


    Thank you for this opportunity! We are humbled.


     Additional Screenshots:







    4 people like this
    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    User Feedback



    Good to see that Synekism is still going at it. Thanks for sharing!

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    seems like it could be interesting for a use

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    It looks like a promising project. I'll keep an eye out for sure!

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an Account  

    Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  :thumb:

    Register a New Account

    Sign In  

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • New Articles

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Featured Topics

  • Recent Modding / Content Posts

    • Sorry to hear you're going through computer problems - those are never fun in the least. I can attest to Asus being a pain. My HDD that went wonky after about 7-8 months(!) was an Asus, and my motherboard (which I think rang up for $250 or something outrageous) has several known problems including a BIOS that has bugged settings and poor optimization settings. Very obnoxious to say the least. When I save up for years and spend an exorbitant amount of money on a computer I expect it to last and the parts to be quality. I had a low-mid range Dell laptop for five years before this custom-built machine and it worked flawlessly for what it was suited for, and it's still chugging along as a relative's computer. Before that one I had a dinosaur desktop that finally died after 8 years of use.
    • 2016 bump - i'm having this same issue.  First time installing NAM ever, version 34, and I open TSCT, it loads the current settings, i make an adjustment and save, just to receive the error, "Error Deleting File(s)."  My version info is;  TSCT 1.3.5 (1725), Simulator Version 2.6. But, if any of ya'll are still waiting for a "simpler solution" or for future readers....this is my solution.  Go to the location that TSCT was installed to, and right click on "TSCT.bat".  Use the Open With Option and choose Notepad.  You may have to run notepad manually, then just click and drag TSCT.bat into the notepad file.  I immediately hit "File / Save As" and saved it to my desktop instead, then edited it adding 1 line to the beginning so it reads; cd "\Program Files (x86)\Traffic Simulator Configuration Tool"
      start /min cmd /C "java -jar TSCT.jar || %windir%\SysWOW64\java -jar TSCT.jar" If you used the standard install directory you can just copy and paste that.  If you changed the install directory, you'll have to point to the location you chose instead.  I've had no problems since.  I just right click on "my" batch file and Run As Admin, instead of trying to run the standard shortcut as admin which I deleted.
    • Thanks for the words of support  - it helps. I've always felt that way too. I have a A31 model (P4, 2002 model) I bought new. It's had a hard life, but still works flawlessly to this day. In fact I've had many Thinkpads, not one ever let me down and most were ex-buisiness 2nd hand units. Even the Lenovo branded models have kept the IBM quality and reliability, which is amazing. Unlike the IdeaPads, which are simply junk. Therein lies the problem for me. I never paid more than maybe just over £100 previously for a motherboard. One Gigabyte model aside, which was simply just a crap board, I've never had a single problem. I've built a lot of PCs for others, I support them and take responsibility for failures. So I'm very picky about which brands I trust. I know of some such machines that are still going over 10 years after I built them. In every case where they are not, it was an upgrade and not hardware failure behind their end of life. So when you pay 230 Euro for a board, because that was the cheapest 1150 socket board supporting more than 6 SATA ports, which I needed/need. You expect better than for 3 years of use out of it. Frankly, my biggest fear is what to buy. If I replace the board with the same one, I don't trust it not to fail. That would be maybe 100 Euro for a second hand one, with no warranty whatsoever. I could buy the refresh Z97 variant of the same board, only 160 Euro new, but I don't trust the brand any more. Since Asus make ASRock, I don't trust them now either. I've had nothing but trouble with driver support on modern MSI boards. And I have a long-standing distrust of Gigabyte too. So where does that leave me? If I actually had 160 Euros, that would also perhaps change things too. As it stands, to get that money, I need to look to selling something from my cherished collection of console games. Probably an EU copy of Conker's Bad Fur Day for the N64 . I just want to know if I make that sacrifice, that the replacement will last.
    • R, It saddens me to hear of your hardships in this regard. Though, you and I have had scant exchanges , I am aware of your passion for this game. which I highly admire. Hopefully the community won't be without you clever, well considered content for an extended duration. Your opinions on modern tech reflect my own.   Best, 6SS
    • Damn, that's certainly a shame to hear. If there is anything I can do to help out, you know where to find me. Hope things get resolved with a minimum of frustration. I have become convinced that Thinkpads are literally the best computers out there. I have a T400 that still runs fantastically (albeit with Mint) and a newer(ish) W540 that I use for literally everything else from Solidworks to CounterStrike. They were quality computers back in the day, and they still are now.