• Moose

    Please Note:  As explained here, due to limitations in the Gallery software, some Challenge submissions may include a larger version of the same image (e.g. for mosaics).
    Before voting, please check in the description and comments section to see if the author has posted one of these. However, it should not be a disadvantage if an author just has the required Gallery image.

Other images in Night Scenes (S3-12-E)

Aerial Perspective Night Scene

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Light is more scattered farther away, so there is less contrast and more brightness.   Objects farther away are more blue as light is receding, closer they are more red as light is approaching.  Color is more saturated up close than far away, and generally farther away objects are more blurry.  


Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
From the album

  • 23 Entries


At SC4 distances focus would be infinity (both with eyes and a camera). So all objects would remain in focus, but I like the concept. The red-blue shift is also false, because there's light scattering at night is different than during the day, and the buildings themselves are not moving, so atmospheric effects would only render distant objects more blue, but wouldn't affect closer objects to make them more red. This is only true for extremely distant objects like stars, nebulae & clusters, and galaxies, and only because their relative speeds are somewhere in the hundreds of thousands of miles per hour (or more, depending on the distance) either towards or away from us (the Andromeda Galaxy is moving towards us at something like 300 000 miles an hour).

Really though, what would end up happening is that the atmosphere would get in the way and cause the distant objects to appear darker because the air that turns them blue during the day (light scattering) would also affect the light transmission at night an obscure more of the light reflected off of the buildings. So distant buildings should be darker at night, and closer buildings brighter, the reverse of what's in this photo.


But like I said before, definitely an interesting idea.

RandyE likes this

Share this comment

Link to comment
3 hours ago, APSMS said:


I like that we can mix art and science here, and I stand corrected on all points.  'artistic license' allows stretching concepts from science to fit the need of art, and I can see my description is messy from a more science POV. 

As like with the infinite focus you mention in the scale of space here, using long lenses in photography focal length can be adjusted to create something like the effect above where space is stretched out.

I think the red/blue shift was used by artists even before the physics was available to explain it, and we have to consider how the human eye/brain perceives space.  We are talking about warmer/cooler light, and I think the science says we perceive closer objects as warmer and further objects as cooler.

I didn't even realize I was mixing both night and day dynamics of light into a reversal. Thanks for pointing it out because I feel I've achieved something even more artistic than I thought.    However, art may be good, but I do agree, science rules. 

APSMS and nos.17 like this

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  :thumb:

Register a New Account

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By CorinaMarie
      This is a SimCity 4 region I created using the Offline Planet Map Generator. (If you want the program, scroll down there and it's the first linky under the pictures. The one that includes the source code because that also has the color table files.) I used the same seed number as my previous 64 large tile Mon Lacus Map, but this one is a portion of that map having 4 x 4 large tiles (16 total) for peeps who like smaller regions. I used the same 14937910 seed number as before, but I set the magnification level to 2.0. This carves out the middle section horizontally and does not require the vertical stretching that the zoom level 1 does. Also, to avoid having to adjust the gamma color level in GIMP I set the -i parameter to -0.051 for creating the grayscale image. (This adjusts the initial altitude for the sea level as seen by the Planet.Exe program.) Here's the complete command line I used:
      Planet.Exe -X -pq -s 0.14937910 -m 2.0 -C Greyscale.col -w 1025 -h 1024 -i -0.051 -o 14937910-SC4Gray.bmp
      ^ If that line wraps it's not supposed to when you do that at the Dos command line.
      You might notice the height parameter is set to 1024 even tho we want 1025. This is because otherwise the program will create a single pixel white row across the top which turns into a wall when rendering in SC4. So, once the grayscale was generated I pulled it up in GIMP and scaled it to 1025 x 1025. Then I added Gaussian Blur of 15.0 both horizontally and vertically to make the rendered map more slope mod friendly. And finally, I set the mode to true grayscale before saving it.
      The pictures above are:
      Lefebvre2 color scheme with contour lines Satellite view from Region Census Traffic view from Region Census My first second third fourth draft of creating my own color table for the program. It's supposed to be similar to the collage of the data view topographical maps I did for the other map, but without me having to do all that tedious copy and precision pasting. Note: It will show more fine detail  because this is before the rendering and does not take into account the merging/averaging that SC4 does when rendering.  The water will also show more detail for elevations. Those (tho averaged in rendering) are still there, but the color ramp for the mini map doesn't have enough divisions to show them. To use: Put the three files in a folder called Mons Lacus Jr under your Region folder of SimCity 4 in your Documents.  Then simply render in game with Shift+Control+Alt+r from that region screen like any other grayscale import.
    • By thiagol
      Hey, i have a 21:9 ultrawide screen and i would like to know, since SC4 does not support 21:9, which resolution would fit the best? I don't intend to cover all the screen, as this is impossible, but i want to have good resolution and most coverage.  1920x1080, 1600x900, 1366x768, etc?
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.