• Moose
  •  

    Please Note:  As explained here, due to limitations in the Gallery software, some Challenge submissions may include a larger version of the same image (e.g. for mosaics).
    Before voting, please check in the description and comments section to see if the author has posted one of these. However, it should not be a disadvantage if an author just has the required Gallery image.

Other images in Night Scenes (S3-12-E)

Aerial Perspective Night Scene

RandyE
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Light is more scattered farther away, so there is less contrast and more brightness.   Objects farther away are more blue as light is receding, closer they are more red as light is approaching.  Color is more saturated up close than far away, and generally farther away objects are more blurry.  

 



Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
From the album

  • 23 Entries
  • 29 Comments


2 Comments

At SC4 distances focus would be infinity (both with eyes and a camera). So all objects would remain in focus, but I like the concept. The red-blue shift is also false, because there's light scattering at night is different than during the day, and the buildings themselves are not moving, so atmospheric effects would only render distant objects more blue, but wouldn't affect closer objects to make them more red. This is only true for extremely distant objects like stars, nebulae & clusters, and galaxies, and only because their relative speeds are somewhere in the hundreds of thousands of miles per hour (or more, depending on the distance) either towards or away from us (the Andromeda Galaxy is moving towards us at something like 300 000 miles an hour).

Really though, what would end up happening is that the atmosphere would get in the way and cause the distant objects to appear darker because the air that turns them blue during the day (light scattering) would also affect the light transmission at night an obscure more of the light reflected off of the buildings. So distant buildings should be darker at night, and closer buildings brighter, the reverse of what's in this photo.

 

But like I said before, definitely an interesting idea.

RandyE likes this

Share this comment


Link to comment
3 hours ago, APSMS said:

 

I like that we can mix art and science here, and I stand corrected on all points.  'artistic license' allows stretching concepts from science to fit the need of art, and I can see my description is messy from a more science POV. 

As like with the infinite focus you mention in the scale of space here, using long lenses in photography focal length can be adjusted to create something like the effect above where space is stretched out.

I think the red/blue shift was used by artists even before the physics was available to explain it, and we have to consider how the human eye/brain perceives space.  We are talking about warmer/cooler light, and I think the science says we perceive closer objects as warmer and further objects as cooler.

I didn't even realize I was mixing both night and day dynamics of light into a reversal. Thanks for pointing it out because I feel I've achieved something even more artistic than I thought.    However, art may be good, but I do agree, science rules. 

nos.17 and APSMS like this

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  :thumb:


Register a New Account

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  •  
  • Similar Content

    • By Chief ZDN
      Hello everyone,
      I'll ask you with 2 question. Can we create network from scratch now or in the future? If available, will it included in the NAM?
      I hope you make solutions to above questions (especially first question). I'm not arrogant or have the knowledge. I know this is difficult. But, starter pieces system has some minuses, like must place the starter piece.
      Thank you.
    • By Jolteon
      A tiny insignificant village next to a tiny insignificant highway.
       
    • By Evanjs
      I have always loved @RRetail And @nos.17 re-lots so I have stated my own re-lots. More to come soon.
       
      Update 1.



    • By UrbanFoxx
      Minderia
      The land of Technology
       
      On February 4, 1991, the US State of Minderia was granted independence after a referendum on the issue the previous year. Located on a giant island west of Los Angeles, it shares a water border with the United States, and its capital is Minderia City, which was only founded in 1977. This SimCity 4 YouTube City Journal is meant to follow the growth of the seven major cities of Minderia. In the end, (sometime in 2020) we will have a city journal finally worthy of being on the City Journal section of this site (which is probably when ST 10.0 will be released)
       
      Without further ado, here's Part 1 of the series!
       
      Here's a rundown on what has been done in this video. In the first entry to this series, we make the interchange of Highway MA4 and MA7 on the South Split as well as build up a retail park, which will be moved further down south because it doesn't exactly look realistic where it sits now. Other than that, I forgot the skyscraper re-lots from KOSC, yeah. Gonna half to download those before the next episode.
    • By hiddentemple
      I installed NAM version 35 a couple of days ago, and works flawlessly, with little to no problems. However, it seems to be doing something with my roundabouts: the avenue, one-way, and regular road roundabouts seem to completely disappear, and I usually have to bulldoze the whole thing and attempt to rebuild it, with rudimentary results. This is a serious concern for me, as some of my cities are saturated with roundabouts.
      I've included a photo below for reference.
      Thanks in advance for any assistance.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.