• Moose
  • Announcements

    • Dirktator

      May donation goal - nearly there! Please help us with a final push!   04/01/2017

      We've had to spend on a few extra things for May but you guys have been great in helping us reach those goals! We're still just a bit shy,  if you can help out with a donation, it would mean a lot! And we'll send you a little gift in return.  Help us reach our May goal so we can keep bringing you site improvements as well!  Donate and Get a Gift or Donate Any Amount Thanks so much! - Dirktator & The Admins

My first real NAM (35)

8 posts in this topic

So, I embarked an retrofitting some NAM.

First, is it a known issue on an OWR-5 that some automata go the wrong way?  Down the center lane?  (see screen shot)

Second, I could not figure out how to make RD-6 turns.  I ended up with intersections which don't really make sense.

But it was a first attempt.  I see with grading and everything else why the focus it on roads first.


17-03-16 22-09-03.jpg

17-03-16 22-11-07.jpg

CT14 likes this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Markshot!

1. This is a visual glitch. Pathing is ok on it.

2. Try making two 45 degree curves instead of one 90 degree curve, the network should stabilize. If not, try placing some additional starter pieces near the curve and click around until it stabilizes.


Hope this helps!


MeMyself&I, rsc204 and CT14 like this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear in mind (2), in the screenshot you've dragged the roads outside of the footprint of a curve. Drag the innner curve first, then the outer curve thereafter, but do not try to connect or overlap them in any way. This is because you are in essence using two roads to make a single road, the code will know what to do, but will mess up if the inner/outside parts are not separated.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the RD-6, it does not have the ability to make sharp 90° bends.  The single-tile NWM networks can, and of the dual-tile networks, just the RD-4 and TLA-5 have the ability to do so.  The OWR-4, OWR-5, and RD-6 lack sharp 90° bends, as do the triple-tile networks (TLA-7/AVE-6).

The reason the RD-4 and TLA-5 got the functionality is due to them having the same number of lanes per direction as the Avenue network, which also has the ability to build those sorts of curves.  I've been hesitant to extend it to the other networks with more lanes per direction, but don't consider the matter of whether or not they will ever be added a closed one.

@Haljackey's suggestion is the best right now.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

In another thread it was stated that SC4 city design is a deep philosophy echoing the patterns of of life.

If SC4 is philosophy.

Then, NAM is particle physics and the Quantum Zoo!  :)

matias93 likes this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, Haljackey, I switched to from 5-OWR to 6-RD as the traffic going the wrong waywas too Hollywood for me.  When I do the back lot of MGM, I will put the 5-OWR back.  :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, you can always edit your post rather than make a new one. Double posting is OK (in moderation) if it is for adding new, separate information a given amount of time from the last post, but if you're adding extra in, and it's right after a previous post, there's no sense spamming people's notification boxes. A simple edit will do.

It's not a serious issue, simple generic forum courtesy. Common sense is usually the best guide here; unfortunately there's no hard and fast rule but I think it makes sense that if there is a double post back-to-back in a short time frame, it is more sensible to edit posts rather than make a whole bunch of short ones.

1 hour ago, MarkShot said:

Then, NAM is particle physics and the Quantum Zoo!

There is always a small amount of uncertainty as to the stability of a given setup (though like with particle physics, increasingly less uncertainty and increasingly stable experiments), and you can always know either the speed or the position of NAM developments, but never both at the same time.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  :thumb:

Register a New Account

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By hamsterdams
      Hi all, new user here. I finally got NAM installed and have been going through some of the new roads.
      However, I noticed that there is a little speech bubble that shows the names of the roads when trying to build, which I find quite annoying.
      Is there anyway to turn this off?

    • By Chief ZDN
      Hello everyone,
      I'll ask you with 2 question. Can we create network from scratch now or in the future? If available, will it included in the NAM?
      I hope you make solutions to above questions (especially first question). I'm not arrogant or have the knowledge. I know this is difficult. But, starter pieces system has some minuses, like must place the starter piece.
      Thank you.
    • By huzman
      I found a couple posts about building roads up some hills, but I couldn't find them again. I followed the "how to grow a gentle slope" but that is on a flat land.
      What I want to find is how to climb a hill with roads upwards. I tried terraforming with RR but that just flatens the terrain, and NOT climb up a hill. I won't go for the 45 degrees climb that Maxis allows, they look ridiculous. Any ideas ?
    • By vintagamer
      The way the monorail stations and the pieces are plopped in Mass Transit seem very similar to SimCity 4. Now, obviously, in SimCity 4, individual puzzle pieces are required, but even in C:S now, you need to choose the specific type of road (avenue, road, etc.) to have a monorail over.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.