• Moose
  • Announcements

    • Dirktator

      March goal: We're almost there!   03/20/2017

      Hi Community! We're almost there for our March goals!  I just wanted to keep the momentum going so if you are able to help, please donate and get some gifts in exchange! Thanks so much to those who have helped out this month, we really appreciate it.
leotychidas

[ASK] realrailways mod on road

11 posts in this topic

anyone knows how to fix that? on road also

Neptune-Sep. 16, 531489514429.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confuzzled. Your topic title refers to circles at the end of a road which would be the cul-de-sacs option of a custom install in NAM. Your picture shows a non-matching texture for the rail crossing. The cul-de-sacs can be added by re-running the NAM installer, selecting Custom, and then clicking the radio button to select them. For the texture matching part we'll have to wait for a NAM expert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am sorry for the title, what a shame lol

 

so, there's no option to fix that rrw?

btw thanks for help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, leotychidas said:

i am sorry for the title, what a shame lol

No worries. I see you fixed it. *:thumb:

 

1 minute ago, leotychidas said:

so, there's no option to fix that rrw?

I imagine there is, but I'm not a guru with NAM. We'll just have to wait until one of them pops in with an official answer. *;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CorinaMarie said:

No worries. I see you fixed it. *:thumb:

 

I imagine there is, but I'm not a guru with NAM. We'll just have to wait until one of them pops in with an official answer. *;)

well, thanks for the answer. i'll be waiting for that :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Leotychidas

It looks like you have the base level crossings installed for the RealRailway. That is the only one for the RRW in you installation. I can give you the texture number so you can make a Level crossing piece that is too you liking if your in a hurry but NAM 36 should have a few more options.

However there are some new variants coming out with the Automated Re-textureing Project That I am a co contributor too.

This project will change the base texture of the whole network and has a special section for level crossings.

The ones you have where made when the main  maker Willy was in charge. I have taken over the project and will continue to work on it for some time.

So I guess the message here is wait and watch this space.

-eggman121 (NAM Team member)

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the crossing texture you show was almost certainly made by @rivit. Having made the initial RRW release with NAM32, @Swordmaster (Willy), who created RRW went MIA. Unbeknownst to a number of us, he had made many crossing textures, but until around NAM33/34 those that did exist were "lost".

In the interim, there was a pressing need for RRW-compatible crossings and as part of his Rum for RRW mod, Rivit was instrumental in making sure they existed. I also was involved with patching RRW support during that period. These textures made their way into the main NAM mod, but they are not mismatching in any way. The rails, gauge and even the concrete bed was all new and designed specifically for RRW.

Unlike when working with the Maxis and/or other rail styles, texture makers had problems with RRW. Because the rails are too close in colour to the blacks used for many transit networks in the NAM. So the old way of simply layering the rails over the network texture simply didn't give good results. This is why the concrete was added, so the rails don't get completely lost in the texture. Subsequently a complete set of textures based on Willy's intended style have been put together. Once more they include a concrete section, but this is the original vision he had for how such crossings would look:

32602904804_a928496d0c_o.jpg

I am hopeful these will make it into NAM36. The ones shown are part of a upcoming refresh of TGN. These also form the basis for the RRW Reskin crossing textures too.

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you ask me, concrete blocks is the standard method to do level crossings I know, so those of the first image look very realistic to me, maybe even more than the newer ones.

In any case, other options exist: to use wood sleepers, or even more rails, but those are less common and somewhat outdated...

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends really, I've seen a lot with Rubber used between the rails here in Germany. Although frankly I barely ever come across a level crossing in my travels.

However, in the case of the RRW Crossings, I thought what you see in the screenshot (no offense to Rivit) simply was of higher quality and more visually pleasing in-game. So I ran with it and spent a lot of time ensure all LHD/RHD US/EU variants are covered. As usual, people will all have their preferences no doubt. But these will be the new default set.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the "rubber" as you put it, between the rails, is more common here in CA (well, San Diego, at least), though of course numerous variations exist, and old right of way for abandoned rails will sometimes still have the old wooden sleepers for the crossing. In fact, although most of the old rail in SD was simply paved over, or had asphalt laid in between the rails, there is still an area right next to the International Airport that remains untouched (leading into the air freight area) and still has wooden sleepers as the crossing material (as well as other rails that were poorly paved over).

Unfortunately we have a great deal of level crossings, but then again So Cal is hardly a flat, rail friendly place, so it's understandable that avoiding level crossings wouldn't be the highest priority (drivers dealing with train traffic are hardly a concern despite the politicking).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As MGB says, the crossings in RUM were a fill-in because otherwise RRW would have launched without. Concrete slabs embedding rail and separating rail from roadway (often asphalt) was the method around here (OZ) as it allows completely stabilising the rail and the roadway - heavy rain tends to gouge out the road (potholes) gap between concrete strips.  Ultimately I found these ones (as in first image above) too bright and a bit wrong to look at and had in fact made a new set that were grubbier and would have made it into the next RUM if it were not for the decision to take the @swordmaster style above in MGBs shot.

The compromise we have struck is that street crossings - low traffic zones - will be bare rail in street and the rest stabilised with one concrete strip per rail. We think we've got 'em all and they look sufficiently weathered. Being consistent in style, colour and brightness is probably more important than the style in itself.

And, as they say, if someone is keen on making an alt set - gird your loins - there are hundreds of them...  and they are fiddly to make without mistakes.

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  :thumb:


Register a New Account

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now


  •  
  • Similar Content

    • By Fantozzi
      Named this way because it should be used with the Real Railway (NAM).
       
      (07/04/2016) - This file is out of date, please download it's replacement here instead:
       
       
      xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      IMPORTANT (07/04/2016)
      The included textures are no longer supported. By the time I did these lots, there were no RRW textures around. Now the RRW is well supported. To reduce the amount of dependencies I strongly recommend to NOT use these textures anymore on future projects. Use Simmer2 textures instead.
      I will upload a new version soon - based on these textures.
      xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
       
      First, thanks:
      Thanks to Magneto for giving me the needed texture ID range.
      Thanks to Swordmaster to allow me to bungle his great rail textures.
       
      Second, dependencies:
       
      BSC Textures Vol 02.dat
      BSC Mega Props - JES Vol01.dat
      BSCMegaProps - JES Vol05.dat
      PEG-CDK3-SP_SEAPORT_SUPER-PAK.dat
      SFBT_Eisenbahn_Props.dat
      RRW_lottex_FZ.dat (overlay RRW-textures, included in this download)
       
      Third, preface
       
      This small project was strongly inspired by the „SFBT Rangierbahnhof“ by Royal (http://kurier.simcityplaza.de/details.php?file=1020) which I used to built up big railyards. I like them very much. With the new NAM and the Real Railway by swordmaster this lots didn't give good lookiing results as they use the textures by north country dude.
       
      But I like the new RRW giving much smoother results. So in march (2014) I started to make a railyard fitting the RRW.
      I needed to make overlay textures – it isn't that difficult, but I got no good results by editing Sowrdmasters textures. I screw them up, started again and screw them up again.
      So this is important, in case you want to use the included overlay textures for your own projects: they are some kind of messy and not always giving good results. I wrote a documentation to show at least the idear behind. It's included as a PDF. If you're not interested in using the textures furthermore you can delete this pdf.
       
      Fourth, content:
       
      1 x functional freight station, size 5 x 7, capacity 6000 (tons per minute?)
       
      4 x single shunting tracks (right english word?), size 1 x 9. They can be connected to the rail system, but have no transport function. They have a small positive effect on economies.
       
      2 x shunting tracks with junctions, size 3 x 8, can be used alone or in combination with the single tracks.
       
      2 x filler lots, size 1x1.
       
      1 x texture package with 40 overlay texture pieces conforming the RRW.
       
      1 x pdf-documentation for the textures.
       
      Five, assorted things:
       
      As the train models didn't have nightlights except of the freight station I left the lots without light. There are german engines on these lots. I'm aware this can't satisfy everybody. I didn't find a solution to make it look „international“ (like seaports or airports can). But feel free to replace the engines. There are many timed props on the lots. I wasn't able to take a picture where you can see all of them.  
       
      UPDATE TO 1.0 (22.12.2014):
       
      Changed Rep-Value in Transit Switch Traffic Capacity to "0" (for MAC-Users).
    • By PaleoCardio
      Hi 
      I am having a problem getting my RRW to work properly on my Windows XP setup. I am missing the catenaries that line the track. I have the Plundere's catenary essentials dependency and here is a picture of my folder with the relevant .dat files added per the readme instructions.
       
      Funnily this worked fine on my mac setup, so I am wondering what I am doing wrong here! I am sure there is something that is wrong and I am not even sure everything else is working as it should with the RRW. This is what my rail line looks like. Is this even RRW?

      Thanks so much for any help and let me know if more information is needed.
      PC
    • By ROmeoBOT
      I am missing some rail textures?
    • By jeffryfisher
      I am currently placing passenger stations on the rail net spanning my large region. My reading in the deep archives confuses me, because some "experts" say I should put all stations on spurs, while others say that the Maxis station doesn't have rail-through its lot, so its capacity is not slammed by through traffic, so it can be placed on a main-line a la real-life. I don't dare resurrect one of the moldering threads from like 2011, so...
      Is there anyone left alive today who can tell me which story to believe, and maybe explain (or point to the correct explanation) what's happening with pax stations?
      And then there's the real mystery: IRL, there's about one commuter station each two miles. That's about one per SimCity sector. Therefore I've been locating one Maxis station in the center of each sector bisected by rail. My vision is to build a village/town around that station in each sector. Can that work with SC4's model, or should I use rail mainly to move sims within sectors, placing a station every two blocks a la subway lines?
      FWIW, I am using NAM-35 (medium) with RRW. RRW solves all rail problems right? Please tell me that with RRW, I can place my stations in a natural way, and my sims will all find jobs no matter where they are in the region 
      OK, I'll settle for the truth as long as I can understand it 
    • By CT14
      Welcome to the development thread for CT14 lots and BAT. Here's a quick list of current releases so you don't have to scroll through the thread to find them all:
      North American Freight Sidings
      Llama Terminal Company
      SABER LA River
      Troy Gasholder Building
      FAB Diagonal Industrials
      North American Freight Sidings original first post:
      Inspired by the lack of existing lots representing protypical North American freight railroad sidings, I've created a system of lots that can be used to create eye-candy rail sidings. They are transit-enabled for appearance. I have been encouraged to share my progress in a dedicated thread by helpful feedback in the Show Us Your Railroads general thread, especially from SimCoug, T-Wrecks, raynev1. And the whole thing wouldn't exist without the Jestarr props.


      Features:
      18 ploppable lots for different railcar types on double track rail Transit enabled connections to make the lots fit in seamlessly anywhere Three prop families to provide a variety from Jestarr's boxcars, intermodal and general merchandise freight ("Junkers") RRW compatibility Known issues:
      Transparent texture bug as described here http://community.simtropolis.com/forums/topic/42425-transparent-texture-issue/ The lots need custom icons created and added, through Reader as described here: http://www.wiki.sc4devotion.com/index.php?title=Tutorial:Inserting_a_custom_menu_icon_with_the_Ilive_Reader Future development ideas:
      Single Track Rail lots don't match exactly when using textures extracted from the RAM .dat, and I probably need permission to use them separately in any case. So, STR sidings may be a separate release at some point. Four-track lots would be prototypical for large yard trackage, but don't exist in RRW. Custom textures might allow some eye-candy four-track lots in future, this would resemble an updated subset of NCD. Dependencies:
      BSCMegaProps JES Vol01 (v1.0) - http://sc4devotion.com/csxlex/lex_filedesc.php?lotGET=342 For RRW, you need the NAM with RRW enabled. Download:
      Please report bugs here. Thanks!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.