• Moose
  • Announcements

    • Dirktator

      Please help us for July   06/30/2017

      This month we're hoping for a little bit of a boost this month or next, in addition to covering the regular bills, we could benefit from some hardware upgrades. STEX Collector's Set gifts can now be sent to you via digital download as well as regular mail if you wish! Every donation dollar goes toward keeping Simtropolis online and humming along. Your contribution counts! Hardware Upgrades As our website community software improves with more and more features, and as we bolt on additional features such as chat, the increased load to handle all these new toys is taking the server a bit to task. You may have noticed that we'd been forced to temporarily disable the chat as we worked out allocating resources for more optimal performance. Following this, we've applied a number of 'soft' changes such as caching options and experimented with server configurations (nginx as proxy, for example), so the hardware aspect is also an area we'd like to focus on. The last time we upgraded hardware was back in 2012, prior to the release of SC13. Your contribution means a lot! Your donation will go toward helping us to 1.) migrate to a newer server or 2.) at least get some ram/cpu/storage updates and any other infrastructure hardware or services. Donate and Get a Gift or Donate Any Amount Thanks so much! - Dirktator & The Admins
Bad Peanut

Bad Peanut sometimes makes things: WIP: Yarra Trams collection

165 posts in this topic

That looks like a lot of modeling work.

I checked out some pics of the irl station.

I think it could be a little darker and less vibrant, and maybe accentuate all the little details, because I can see they are there just not very visible so it makes it looks flatter.

And the roof has more rust or whatever that brown thing is on the copper roof, it's not that clean green.

Also the entrance corner looks a bit weird and broken where it connects to the ground but I assume that's wip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Needs more nopes. 

Like spiders, snakes, human sized bats and etc. 

 

But so far it looks freaking fantastic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Ronyx69 said:

That looks like a lot of modeling work.

I checked out some pics of the irl station.

I think it could be a little darker and less vibrant, and maybe accentuate all the little details, because I can see they are there just not very visible so it makes it looks flatter.

And the roof has more rust or whatever that brown thing is on the copper roof, it's not that clean green.

Also the entrance corner looks a bit weird and broken where it connects to the ground but I assume that's wip.

I should say that everything but the heritage looking part have no normal maps as of that picture haha so hopefully they're the only flat looking parts (yellow and red brick buildings do have all their maps)

and I'm still playing around with the ground connection bits

With the roof -  it uses one texture coordinate for all 8 sides of the dome, if i add a browning affect it could look a bit too repetitive? do you think i still should? - I was trying to save on space in the diffuse by only mapping one face and repeating them.

In terms of darkness - it could go darker (and I agree) but i'm thinking that it does get that bright in direct sunlight but most of the time melbourne is overcast like the european map theme (which it looks much better in) - what do you think? make it darker and risk it being too dark in other themes?

Also just a a general query: the road that's on the short end (the tram road in the pictures) should i embed that in the model (because it's actually 2m higher than the terrain) or let the player figure it out - first means i would set it to be a tram road and the asset would need snowfall to work, the second option would mean a bit of confusion for subscribers but more choice in terms of road placement... I'm torn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy crap - that is awesome! I remember walking past it when I was in Melbourne once - such a beautiful building.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, mrsmartman said:

It would be good if more facades could be added to the station.

what do you mean? It's got all the facade of flinder's street station - there's no more to add??

mrsmartman likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOVE IT! I'm a huge fan of Melbourne and this station is such a beauty to look at. Thank you for doing this. I'm blown away. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, donoteat said:

I like big stations and I cannot lie.

 

 

Can we use it like a through-station like the real thing, or is this a stub-ended terminal? 

it's through :) the tracks turn into tunnels at the swanston bridge end so you can continue the tracks and bring them back up to surface whenever

Turjan, mrsmartman, Judazzz and 1 other like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Bad Peanut said:

what do you mean? It's got all the facade of flinder's street station - there's no more to add??

I always think that is an unfinished station without a canopy due to budget constraint.

Moreover, the owner of the station can take advantage of the air rights attached to the station.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 03/12/2016 at 2:36 PM, mrsmartman said:

I always think that is an unfinished station without a canopy due to budget constraint.

Moreover, the owner of the station can take advantage of the air rights attached to the station.

hahahah I'm just recreating what's current - i was debating doing the original design but it makes more sense for people to have what's there at the moment if they want to try and recreate melbs a bit.

mrsmartman and Avanya like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Magga cammara, that looks good! I love that mesh roof. I think this could make a really good main metro station as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent stuff. This is exactly the kind of model that we need more of in the workshop. Looking forward to it!

 

What inspired your roof structure, or the whole station in general?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks awesome! I'm amazed that to date no one has attempted to create any of the iconic London stations- St Pancras would be amazing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, mutton noir said:

Looks awesome! I'm amazed that to date no one has attempted to create any of the iconic London stations- St Pancras would be amazing

i think it's the effort that goes into it haha - a little daunting - flinders was hard enough

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Bad Peanut said:

i think it's the effort that goes into it haha - a little daunting - flinders was hard enough

I can only imagine! I'm in awe of your skills and talent. Respect!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How can the elevated track would be the cross point to about midway of the station, Mr. BadPeanut is what measures?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, just a quick screenshot of the trains I'm working on now, this is my first vehicle asset and by god they are a hell of a lot more difficult to do - what a learning curve. Still I think they'll turn out ok :) they'll be released in 3 car set and 2x 3 car set (6 car set). These are the B Class trains in Perth, WA. Still working on getting the UV mapping ok and making the textures.

Here's a reference picture:

tr4783.jpg

 

and here's my WIP model:

58c81a30d87ce_Screenshot25.thumb.png.9f9b5eb2b77ce0382fe94211f99e3a41.png

odrzutowiec, Stanil, Avanya and 6 others like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  :thumb:


Register a New Account

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now


  •  
  • Similar Content

    • By CT14
      The Norfolk and Western Railway (NW) used the HL Class 40 ft, 2 bay "fishbelly" hopper cars to transport coal during the early to mid 20th century. These Late Steam/Transition era cars have the "sloped side sheets" with original road numbers 22000-25999, 38000-39999, and 68500-69499. [1]
      Some HL class were rebuilt into H9 class around 1949, this marked the beginning of the phasing out of the design. By 1960 they were using different cars and different paint schemes, and the Norfolk and Western was running diesel on its mainlines starting in 1959. [2]
      Installation:
      Simply unzip the "CT14 - Norfolk and Western HL Class Hopper Cars.zip" file into your plugins folder.
      Removal:
      Remove the "Norfolk and Western HL Class Hopper Cars" folder from your plugins folder (normally in Plugins/CT14/Norfolk and Western HL Class Hopper Cars". Lots which use these props will be a little bit emptier.
      Prop catalog:
      For SimCity, these cars have been rendered as HD props in a variety of angles and filled with coal in three variations, along with empty car versions.
      Orthogonal (3 load variations plus empty):
      - 90 deg
      Diagonal (3 load variations plus empty):
      - 45 deg
      Curve Fitting Angles (consecutive angles' loads will generally vary, plus empty versions of all):
      Left and Right versions of:
      - 5.625 deg
      - 11.25 deg
      - 16.875 deg
      - 22.5 deg
      - 28.125 deg
      - 33.75 deg
      - 39.375 deg
      Fractional Angles (3 load variations plus empty for each pair of angles):
      FA2 26.6/63.4
      FA3 18.4/71.6
      Release history:
      v1.0 - 20170225 - Initial release
      References:
      [1] Rex Desilets, "N&W HL Class Hopper Road Numbers?" (O Gauge Railroad forum), http://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/topic/nandamp-w-hl-class-hopper-road-numbers?nc=1
      [2] PC9850, "Correct Steam-Era N&W Coal Hoppers?" (ibid), http://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/topic/correct-steam-era-nandampw-coal-hoppers
      Development thread:
      http://community.simtropolis.com/forums/topic/69360-ct14s-railroad-lots-and-bat/
    • By Thin White Duke
      There's some minor chatter on reddit about pursuing a potential OpenSC4 to open up a whole slew of modding possibilities that have thus far been impossible. It's currently mostly a faint dream, but the more people who know about it and are talking about it, the higher the chances of it becoming reality. I personally know the square root of nil about coding, so I'd be about as useful as a mobility scooter in a Formula one race, but I can be on the grand stand to cheer everybody on!
      https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenSC4/
      https://www.reddit.com/r/simcity4/
    • By PaulJChris
      Hi ladies and gents.
      I am a reasonably experienced asset maker with around 100 models built for Cities XXL.  Sadly the game is no longer supported , the player base has dwindled and  what is achievable by modding in that game appears to have reached its limits.  I bought Skylines upon release but neglected  to note the system requirements ( 64bit only)  so could not play it for nearly a year  until upgrading to a decent modern PC which I now have.  I suppose I am looking for a new home.   I have several hundred hours experience in 3dsmax and have recently gravitated towards Substance Painter and Substance Designer for texturing as the system is faster and more intuitive for me and enables the creation of all the required maps in one go rather than making them individually in PS which I used to do.    I have some limited programming experience but am not up to speed with C# .  I  am however motivated to learn enough to be productive on the modding side as I can see great potential for Skylines in the years ahead.
      About 6 weeks ago I revisited Skylines and also reviewed what has been achieved by the modding community  since release. Simply  amazing.  Also  the quality of the user made assets appears to be rising continually.  This has inspired me to seriously re- engage with the game.   I have out around 90 hours  play so far and have grown cities to 100K so I have reasonable grasp of the game dynamics but am not an expert.  I got fed up with vanilla after about 30K and started introducing mods, mainly the gameplay ones  such Move It, Road anarchy , Find it, RICO etc .  I am now at the stage where I want to move more towards realism as my instincts are more in the City painter camp hence my interest in making assets.   I have studied most of the tutorials on asset creation and have learned a lot, I have also read through a number of prominent  modders threads on here noting their progression from their first attempts to the amazing stuff more recently created.
      I recognize a few names on  here from Xlnation .   I wonder if I could start by importing some of my CitiesXXL assets into Skylines?.   Anyone  else done this  and can pass on any knowledge/tips before I start  would be appreciated.  Is it worth the effort or is it better to start from scratch?   I obviously already  have all the 3DSmax files and textures , it would seem that the Cities XXL lod 4 can be re -used as it carries the same target spec ( ie less than 100 triangles).  Then a case of choosing which of the 3 other Lods to use for the main model.   Then striping out the bases of the XXL models as not required in C:S  .   Then redoing the nightlighting to comply with the C:S standard.  Will mostly need to be RICO stuff i think, most of my existing  models do not have a multiple of 8M footprint,  some are at the CXL standard of  40m x 40m (5 x 5 in skylines language).   You can review my back catalogue here  http://xlnation.city/resources/authors/pauljchris.19/  to see  if there are any models in there that people would like to see in Cities Skylines and I will attempt some conversion work before I move on to making fresh stuff.  Please bear in mind that some of my earliest work is of  lesser quality, I like to think I improved a bit with practice over time.
      Thanks for reading . I hope to be able to get up to speed  with C:S  and to be in a position to contribute something decent for the community fairly soon.
      Regards
      PJC
       
    • By alborzka
      Door Markers are useful for pedestrians/residents of a building. But for commercial deliveries, and service vehicles, they all seem to use one single entrance of the building. Is there any way to add different entrances of a building, like trucks going to one entrance for deliveries and service vehicles to another? Or adding multiple entrances for trucks and service vehicles, since Door Markers won't work?
      Also, I'm hoping to make some buildings with multi-level functionality, so that it can be placed somewhere with steep slopes (e.g. informal communities (slums) on the hillside). This way, someone 3 stories above can enter the building as well as someone on the ground floor, they can access the same building through different entry points. Or, let's say a building has an office as its main building, and the cafeteria as a sub-building. I want someone from a road 3 stories above the ground floor to be able to enter the main office, and someone from the ground floor to enter the cafeteria (which occupies the ground floor), and both cims can go to both parts of the building without having to exit the building (since that would render the point of multiple entrances useless). Is this possible by setting indoor paths between the sub-buildings?
      tl;dr: How can I add multiple entrances to a building for service vehicles to use? Is it possible to have functional multi-level, multi-purpose buildings with entrances on different levels? Can they be made so cims don't have to leave the building and use another external entrance, they can just stay in that building?
    • By alborzka
      EDIT: Turns out the below issue is caused by RICO and WP Realistic Population mods not playing nicely with each other; whenever local settings are added to any type of commercial and Realistic Pop is disabled for that particular building, that building will always be "not operating" despite having workers. Only way for it to operate is to have Realistic Pop enabled for it, which would render your local settings for it useless. The workaround solution so far seems to be enabling Realistic Pop for that asset, plopping it in-game to find out its generated worker amount, and then going into WG_RealisticCity.xml to add something along these lines:
          <meshName bonus="-311">651651763.Alliance_Data</meshName>
      to add/subtract however much is needed to get it to be the amount of workers you want. Hopefully this will be fixed in the upcoming RICO version @AJ3D?
      OP below: -----------------------
      I tried making a bunch of buildings into mixed-use by loading this underground parking lot asset into Asset Editor, resize it into the building size, save it under a new name, and then load the building into Asset Editor and add this resized parking lot as a sub-building. Saving the building under a new name, I now go into RICO to assign properties to its new sub-building. Results?
      Residential, Industrial, Office, Park, even School = works great, as intended, and "operating normally". Commercial (low, high, tourist, leisure)? Not Operating. Always. They get plenty of workers, and always have a "happy face", but always not operating. I even have the Resilient Owners mod to make sure it's not just a UI bug, but it also says "Clients served: 0" aka the business hasn't made any money or sold any goods, so it really isn't operating and it's not just a UI bug. I have no idea why! The main building functions no matter what it is (commercial or otherwise), but sub-buildings only function properly if they're not commercial.
       
      The odd thing is, I have the new Imperia Tower building which is mixed use and comes with RICO settings for its sub-building, and its commercial sub-building works great -- Operating Normally and no problems.
      How does this asset have functioning commercial sub-buildings and mine don't? How do I get my commercial sub-buildings to function properly, since all my other sub-buildings are fine?
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.