• Moose
  • Announcements

    • Dirktator

      Help us with our donation goal for a new Chat upgrade!   04/17/2017

      Your donations not only help keep the site up and running, but also allows us to expand some functionality and upgrade other features of the site periodically to stay current! We're looking for some community support to help us get a new Chat system (as you know our old Chat is no longer supported by IP.Board). A new system promises to give us many more options and all for fairly little cost, relatively speaking. Please help us reach our April goal so we can keep bringing you site improvements as well!  Donate and Get a Gift or Donate Any Amount Thanks so much! - Dirktator & The Admins
Cyclone Boom

bugs
Simtropolis 8.1.x - Bugs & Issues Report Thread

382 posts in this topic

6 minutes ago, Silur said:

It work for me well today, but I had same problem before.

Oh, it works normally now. I had the problem in the morning... should have double checked before posting, sorry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can confirm the thread page loading issue has now been identified and should now no longer be present. *:)

After looking into this, it was caused by the Google ads which are shown below the initial post in each thread page (e.g. above mine here, as it turns out).

Threads used AJAX to load pages inline, without needing to refresh the entire layout. Basically this was incompatible with the ads, meaning there was a clash when the request was made. Dirk has now disabled this in favour of the standard method of loading. So if you notice a visual difference when changing pages, that's the reason.

Since ad blockers would bypass the issue, this explains why it wasn't consistent for all users.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please forgive me if the following topic already exists. In which case please also provide a relevant link.

I wish very much for the ability to search the STEX for terms with fewer than four characters. This ability vanished upon deployment of the new web server software, and I am unable to find a viable workaround despite vigorous searching and experimentation. Countless words are completely ignored including NAM, RRW, MOD, HD, CAM, RUM, BSC, BAT, PEG, PIM, lot, bug etc. AFAICT, such terms are even excluded from searches that also include accepted strings ('HD download' only searches for 'download'). Please advise.

matias93 and APSMS like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A viable workaround is to use Google as the search engine. When searching on Google, include this string at the end

site:simtropolis.com

To make it to look only on this site. You can also refine the search detailing the part of the site. For example, for files use:

site:community.simtropolis.com/files/

Cyclone Boom and CorinaMarie like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, matias93 said:

A viable workaround is to use Google as the search engine. When searching on Google, include this string at the end

site:simtropolis.com

To make it to look only on this site. You can also refine the search detailing the part of the site. For example, for files use:

site:community.simtropolis.com/files/

Thank you for the prompt reply. I am aware of this method and use it frequently on the LEX. However, one can't limit the data to file type or any other subcategory; nor does it offer effective search filters or image previews -  just the top three among many other shortcomings. I would also like to omit comments from the result set. They should only appear along with the selected record as before. Likewise, I don't need to see row after row of yellow stars without an attached reply.

APSMS and matias93 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely agree. The site search in its current state is far from acceptable, and has been for too long. This is apparently a limitation of the software and MySQL (database format), not necessarily an issue with indexing or the server environment.

The good news is IPS (the devs) are set to add those much promised search improvements mid-way through the year. The aim here would be to find ways of overcoming the limitations, at least to what is technically feasible. Following this, they intend to integrate support for an external service, such as Elasticsearch. Once implemented, this would be a much more powerful platform, working above & beyond the current limitations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't be more pleased with the swift and intelligent support on this site from both staff and fellow users. To that effect it would be wrong of me not to credit the developers for a categorically positive user experience. I understand project workflow and ask only that my feedback is heard by the development team.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The counter on the Forums page likes me more than the total I really have. *:blush:

2505%20vs%202507_zpshde5hty3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CorinaMarie said:

So, @Thin White Duke and I were in chat chatting when we got kicked by the System. Now I get this trying to join:

*:(

Edit: And now it's ok again. *:lol:

That happened to me the last time I was in chat too. It might have something to do with losing support for the chat client, but it is probably just a glitch.

CorinaMarie likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/03/2017 at 10:30 PM, Takingyouthere said:

Small bug in the leaderboard section, the rep counts listed in this category are definitely a little bit off -
http://community.simtropolis.com/leaderboard/?in=downloads-comment_id&time=oldest

I've performed an auto-recount for those selected members, which has increased their rep totals to the correct values.

For whatever reason, it turns out their total was much lower than their actual received rep. The Leaderboard must display them properly, since the data is regularly rebuilt on a scheduled basis.

 

On 21/03/2017 at 10:54 PM, CorinaMarie said:

The counter on the Forums page likes me more than the total I really have. *:blush:

Now you've been registered over a year, looks like this is no longer noticeable. I'm beginning to think there's something awry with those counters...

 

5 hours ago, CorinaMarie said:

So, @Thin White Duke and I were in chat chatting when we got kicked by the System. Now I get this trying to join:

(Error code: 4H269/N)

Anything intermittent usually points to a server issue. And since Chat is an external IPS service, I'd guess it's on their end.

Let us know if it persists any longer, and it can be reported. Even though there's not much longer than 3 weeks remaining, IPS Chat is still a service we're entitled to receive in a functional state until it closes.

 

1 hour ago, Hamish said:

It might have something to do with losing support for the chat client, but it is probably just a glitch.

Not willing to address something as simple as the scrollbar bug (which I found a workaround with minimal effort), it does make you wonder about their focus now on maintenance in general.

I guess it isn't overly surprising with the imminent retirement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really a bug, but did the font suddenly change for the forum messages on the site?
Or did I press a button somewhere on my end and change something?
Or are my eyes going bad?

korver likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, you're not seeing things. The font has certainly changed, and I noticed this Monday evening and initially thought my browser was to blame.

As a comparison, here's a quick preview showing your post in both fonts:
 

BthwuMP.gif

(Imported into a page I had saved locally from February.)


Unmistakably the font appears the same style but stretched/raised vertically. Not sure of everyone else's opinions on this, but I think it now appears less clear, especially for certain letters. Although visually larger in size, there's less definition and it's not as legible IMO, especially for lengthy paragraphs. o.O

The font used is called Roboto, and is available on Google Fonts listed here. Simtropolis seemingly uses this through reference inside a style sheet (as a web font). The style is 14px regular, which can be recreated using the sample on that listing.


Now interestingly, checking the CSS from my archived page and that which is currently used, there's a small but notable difference:

Old:

url(http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/roboto/v15/CWB0XYA8bzo0kSThX0UTuA.woff2) format('woff2');

New:

url(http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/roboto/v16/CWB0XYA8bzo0kSThX0UTuA.woff2) format('woff2');

 

The old code makes reference to a version 15 of the font, while it now refers to version 16. :O

Now, it's not clear whether this change occurred this week, or any of the weeks prior. But based on this, there's a strong possibility the font has been automatically 'upgraded' without our approval. There have been no recent theme changes made on-site to my knowledge, in which case this has come completely unexpected.


I'll check with Dirk to see whether reverting is an option. The old version still seems to be online (by visiting that URL), so that may be a possibility.

Or if everyone's happy we can always keep with the new version. Maybe it'll just take some getting used to.

Any thoughts on this?

Maybe another referendum beckons...

_Michael, APSMS and Ceafus 88 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cyclone Boom said:

The old code makes reference to a version 15 of the font, while it now refers to version 16. :O

Goodness. If it takes 15 or 16 tries to get a font right maybe they should go back to coding school. *:lol:

 

1 hour ago, Cyclone Boom said:

I'll check with Dirk to see whether reverting is an option. The old version still seems to be online (by visiting that URL), so that may be a possibility.

I'd be concerned that v15 might disappear in the future since they didn't bother to ask if we wanted to change. So, if you hard code a reference to it one day we'll log on and there will be no visible messages cause the font is gone. And we won't be able to read the error message cause it'll be an invisible error saying it cannot post the error which will cause an error that it'll try to post which it can't and so on. This endless loop will draw more and more power until the server overloads. The resulting explosion could destroy life on this planet. Tread carefully if you plan to tempt fate. *;)

 

1 hour ago, Cyclone Boom said:

Or if everyone's happy we can always keep with the new version. Maybe it'll just take some getting used to.

Any thoughts on this?

I like v16 better so I'm happy if we stay with it. I'm used to it already. *:)

 

Chief ZDN and Cyclone Boom like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact, most of the time I'm on the forum, if through the phone, so I see everything in whichever version of Roboto it uses. So i didn't even note a difference.

Now, if there is the possibility of using another web font, I would recommend my new personal favourite, Asap.

Cyclone Boom and CorinaMarie like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been using Firefox, and maybe my version has some stuff done to it via addons, but the font that I'm seeing is still the same. It could be that I'm still referencing an old cache settings file (or something like that), because the CSS still points to the new version of the font.

If I open this page in Chrome I can definitely see the difference. Ironically I cannot see a difference on my phone, and I would have noticed given that I can definitely tell the difference on my computer. Neither of the phones I have seem to be using Roboto v16, nor does it seem that the CSS is affecting them.

I thought I was either completely oblivious or going crazy, not seeing any of these font things you were discussing.

EDIT: As a total aside, I notice that my ISP has enabled IPv6; it doesn't seem to be working, but this is the first ISP I've had that has had this functionality in even a rudimentary form! So, hopefully it gets fleshed out in the coming weeks.


  Edited by APSMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knew such a tiny font change could get us with such surprise?  Actually, I sometimes use letters with macrons or other diacritics in my posts when Romanizing from other languages, and I had noted for some time now that after a long ago change, the "o" in "ō" had a different, taller x-height in pixels than a plain "o" with no macron.  I figured it was some sort of under-the-hood switching of fonts when using such uncommon characters, especially as I was always just inserting them into posts via cut-and-paste from a saved Notepad template of unusual characters rather than inputting any type of specific special character code.  Now I see, at least at my end, that the forum once again displays "o" and "ō" with similar pixel x-heights:  oooōōō.  Bolding them, however, makes them noticeably different in width:  ooōō.

It's a 1-pixel difference, but there is an entire industry of typography devoted to such differences.  If only that industry could figure out why the music player on my Android phone will show all the kanji, hànzì, and even Hangul I throw at it, but it cannot correctly show bold macron characters and it will absolutely not show the Pīnyīn "Ǒ" (a capital "O" with a caron diacritic).  I have a soundtrack by Vic Chou that depends on this desperate issue of digital typography being immediately resolved at best possible speed lest I be forced to revert back to Wade-Giles Romanization.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, APSMS said:

I've been using Firefox, and maybe my version has some stuff done to it via addons, but the font that I'm seeing is still the same.

I'm also using FF and mine automatically shows the new font version in these posts. I noticed that my rank (Squadron Leader), number of posts, and my location are still the old version. Note: I saw it that way in the 52.whatever it was before the FF update this morning. And now it's still showing the same for both fonts in 53.0.

 

3 hours ago, APSMS said:

As a total aside, I notice that my ISP has enabled IPv6; it doesn't seem to be working, but this is the first ISP I've had that has had this functionality in even a rudimentary form! So, hopefully it gets fleshed out in the coming weeks.

There's a handy little test you can run to see how IPv6 ready you are.

Cyclone Boom likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The puzzling thing about this change is there's no apparent news or anything referring to the release of a version 16. Or if there is, Google's non the wiser. A search for "Roboto v15" brings almost 20,000 hits, while "Roboto v16" less than 100. And guess what's currently top of the list... *:P   (This thread)

There is also very little reference to any of the supposed older versions. For it to accumulate the majority of results, this suggests that v15 has been the stable and most common edition used around the interwebs for quite a while. Interestingly to note that by changing the version number in the URL, it's possible to access all those back to v12. None of the others are still hosted in that form at least.

Checking back through my archives, Roboto was first introduced as our site font in June 2015 (coinciding with the debut of IPS 4.0), and the font remained as v15 until this week. So it seems rather peculiar to go at least 2 years without modification, and then all of a sudden someone force feeds this update without making any of the Five Ws known. An official entity must've authorised the release, though I find it hard to believe we're the only site who's so far experienced and is discussing the change.


With there being a difference on mobile and some text, I believe this is actually an illusion:

On devices with smaller resolutions, the site uses a 13px font as I've formatted this sentence. This is one increment smaller than the default 14px on the main desktop view.

But viewing them side by side, the smaller size does seem quite a lot smaller.

Checking the page styles, the same also applies with text fields including the user titles and location. Since the new font has basically raised the characters (as per my gif preview), it gives the impression of a larger size when the area is in fact identical. *;)


Anyway, if the general consensus is we're satisfied with the new font, I'm more than happy for it to remain.

Should we stick with it, I'm sure it'll quickly become increasingly familiar with those who aren't yet in favour (for one, it's already growing on me).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  :thumb:


Register a New Account

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now


  •  
  • Similar Content

    • By TekindusT
      I was just taking a look to the Milestone thread and realized I have no idea what those stars under our usernames and ranks in the forums mean. Sure they have a logic behind but it's a bit difficult to see for me, except that the users with most posts have their first star inside a shield or inside a banner...? But why some users with less posts have 5 stars and others have only 1 but the first one is shielded... ? Are they tied to our post count? You get it. Any Simtropolite ready to shed some light on this matter for me?
    • By manueld832
      So I started building RHW(new to RHW btw) to reduce regional traffic then I notice that the trucks are constantly changing lanes or doing a zigzag movement........please help!!! 
      Here's a photo https://www.dropbox.com/s/6gij4k6il26idqj/20170329_232144.jpg?dl=0
    • By mike_154
      i want to donate money to you guys,for your great work here at simtropolis, but i can not because paypal is not responding.Why dont you guys make an open pay system for credit cards,then we do not need this hassle. 
    • By Cyclone Boom

      Our friends at GOG.com had a special City-Builder discount sale!  (Closed as of February 13, 2PM GMT) 

      As part of this, Simtropolis has been given a bunch of free keys to selected games to give away!
      Winners announced here!

      If you want one of these games, simply reply to this thread by answering ONE of the questions below:
      What's your favourite city-building game, and why will you always be fond of it? Write a creative and entertaining review (good or bad) of any city-building game. The ways in which custom content has transformed the city-building game you play. Tell us about your most memorable city-building experience, funny, tragic or otherwise.
      There is no minimum or maximum, but aim to write at least 50 words.
       
      FAQ

      Q: How are prize winners selected?
      A: The Admins will pick their favourite replies below, so don't delay, post away!
      Q: How many times can I reply?
      A: Just one reply per person please.
      Q: Can I add images or video to my post?
      A: Sure! Feel free to be creative to make your post stand out.
      Q: Does it have to be written in a certain style?
      A: No, not at all. Just aim to make it creative and entertaining, whether fact or fiction...
      Q: How long does this run for?
      A: The closing date to enter is Monday 13th February at 23:59 (EST).
       
      Prizes

      Winners will be able to select ONE of the following City-Building classics, to add to their personal collection:
       
      Caesar
      1993

      SimCity 2000 Special Edition
      1995

      Caesar II
      1995

      Pharaoh + Cleopatra
      1999

      SimCity 3000 Unlimited
      2000

      Emperor: Rise of the Middle Kingdom
      2002

      Banished
      2014

      Tropico 5
      2014

      Lethis - Path of Progress
      2015

      Urban Empire
      2017

       
      Whatever your experience with a City-Builder, we'd love to hear it.
       
    • By Cyclone Boom
      Got some ideas?
      Here's a place where you can recommend any improvements to Simtropolis. 
      It's about time we had one of these. Even though the site continues to develop, we'd love to hear your thoughts on how it can be further refined and made better for everyone. Whether it be a simple layout/design tweak, or a completely brand new feature, post away in this thread!
      While we can't promise everything will be possible or implemented, each idea will be read and considered. I'm sure you'll appreciate there are limitations, both technically and financially.
      To report any issues with an existing site feature, or something not working as intended, please instead use the Bugs Thread.
       
      Guidelines
      For clarity, please keep one idea per post. Double posts are acceptable if you've more than one idea at once.
      Note: To prevent successive replies from auto-merging, you may need to wait 5 minutes.
        Give a subheading, describing briefly what the idea is.
        Explain the idea -- it helps to give as much detail as possible. Pictures or diagrams are acceptable, but not required.
        Why would this be of benefit to the community?
        If you value anyone's idea, please Like it to show your support. This helps to give a rough indication of how well an idea is received.
        If commenting on an idea, please quote/copy the subheading so it's clear what is being discussed.  
      Progress Status
      Once processed, ideas will be tagged with one of the following:
       
      NOT PLANNED -    The idea is appreciated, but at this stage, is not feasible to implement.
        INTERNAL REVIEW -    We like the idea, and will pursue whether it's currently feasible to implement.
        PLANNED -    We have decided to implement the idea, and are finding the best ways to go about it.
        IMPLEMENTED -    The idea has been added as a new site feature!
      This will change depending on ongoing progress with implementation.
       
      Thanks all!
      -The Admins
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.