• Moose
  • Announcements

    • Dirktator

      March goal: We're almost there!   03/20/2017

      Hi Community! We're almost there for our March goals!  I just wanted to keep the momentum going so if you are able to help, please donate and get some gifts in exchange! Thanks so much to those who have helped out this month, we really appreciate it.
Cyclone Boom

bugs
Simtropolis 8.1.x - Bugs & Issues Report Thread

370 posts in this topic

It's strange though how some members totals are higher while others are lower. I would expect one to have the higher numbers all around, sounds like it might not be an easy fix.

On 3/4/2017 at 10:25 PM, Cyclone Boom said:

To account for a wider range of users, the daily totals currently use the PST (UTC-8) time zone. So if you were in a later time zone, this means the daily cut-off point would be after your midnight (e.g. 3am EST).

This may explain why you were leading with 15 rep as pictured, but then @Hamish must've had a strong finish to reach 19 rep in the time remaining.

(Sorry, rather ironically, I think your marvellous Trixies Interview is responsible for that!)  :whatevs:

Didn't realize that, makes sense now thanks for the info.

On 3/4/2017 at 10:25 PM, Cyclone Boom said:

I'm not sure on the method of the tiebreaker, but I suspect it's based on the earlier or later received rep (i.e. on countback).

In such instances, I would support a draw being declared, as time is merely a quantitative variable, unlike the rep being given. And contrary to sports, there doesn't always need to be outright podium winners!

Yes agreed, that would be the fairest way to go about it. 

On 3/4/2017 at 10:25 PM, Cyclone Boom said:

Leaderboard Performance

By the way... *:read:

With the Leaderboards, has anyone else noticed the main list and time filters being slower to respond? For me, loading these intermittently takes upwards of 45 seconds.

Noticed the same, it's always taken a long time to load, I just assumed that there was a lot of data for the program to go through.

On 3/4/2017 at 11:25 PM, Hamish said:

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to steal your thunder by hijacking your thunder and using it against your own thunder :???:

lol *:lol: no worries. I wouldn't want it the other way around either since both parties contribute to the interview but would it be possible for both the interviewer and the interviewee to receive the rep from their respective interviews? I'm guessing it could be done manually but then it wouldn't count on the leaderboard. Either way it's not a big deal it's cool enough that a lot of people seem to be checking out the interviews. 

dk1 is leading the rep count for today and I suppose it's possible that other members have liked his content 30 times today but it kind of seems a little unlikely considering he has posted anything on the site in 5+ years :golly:


@Cyclone Boom Something is definitely wonky with the leaderboard the last few days. Yesterday it was dk1 and today bixel is leading the rep count - with 83 no less! :golly:quite possibly a single day record. But strangely enough bixel hasn't posted or even logged onto the site in over a year and none of his content is shown as having been given a like in the list of popular content leaders for the day, stranger days indeed. 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 05/03/2017 at 3:25 AM, Cyclone Boom said:

I'm not sure on the method of the tiebreaker, but I suspect it's based on the earlier or later received rep (i.e. on countback).

Some additional info on Leaderboard tiebreakers:

Apparently there's no such thing. According to IPS, ties are only split by whichever results are first pulled from the database. So in other words, a logical method isn't used.

An even bigger case for draws then...

 

On 05/03/2017 at 5:58 AM, Takingyouthere said:

I wouldn't want it the other way around either since both parties contribute to the interview but would it be possible for both the interviewer and the interviewee to receive the rep from their respective interviews?

No probs, I'll sort that out for you and the other interviewees once they're all posted. Made a note of it in a file named:  Simtropolis to do List.docx  *:read:

Like you say though, this wouldn't affect the Leaderboards or any time-measured rep total.

 

On 05/03/2017 at 5:58 AM, Takingyouthere said:

Something is definitely wonky with the leaderboard the last few days. Yesterday it was dk1 and today bixel is leading the rep count - with 83 no less!

After investigating this, it would seem both @dk1 and @bixel had a whole bunch of their existing STEX files liked. On each day, this caused them to acquire enough rep to claim the lead, and pip you to the post on both occasions. In bixel's case, a momentous gain indeed.

There were two separate users involved (which I won't bring to light here). Although from past & present evidence, we believe the circumstances for them liking the files was genuine, with no ill intent to prevent you winning the daily total. So based on that, we're reluctant to make changes which would reverse this and alter the standings. The community is in charge of these Leaderboards, and manually adjusting would take control away, and also set a precedent for the future.

If interested, it's possible to check by visiting the rep activity for dk1 and bixel on their profiles. Since these are single instances (each file), it explains why they aren't shown in the "Popular Content" list. On both days, the lowest individual item has 2 likes.

The fact that any content can be liked at any time, means this is really a limitation of the system. Exactly the same with new content, it's possible for older files, posts, or other items to receive rep, and count to that day's standings. So in theory, this means anyone with at least one content item can achieve this.

Looking back at the history, it seems this isn't the first time an inactive user has attained 1st place. I guess it's just one of those things which by chance, has occurred two days in a row whilst you were leading. Sorry about that!

(However, especially with your return to the CJ scene, I'm sure #47 can only be a matter of time.)  *;)

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been having that page refresh bug, too, in case it helps. I usually use Firefox, but have noticed the problem on other browsers as well. Refreshing manages to load the right page, but it takes a manual refresh, as otherwise the page merely hangs. Happened right here in this thread, too, as I was scanning back the archives to see if others had already reported it.

 

Just another user to add onto the pile of people reporting bugs, just so that the software providers have a harder time claiming it's isolated. *;)

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, Cyclone Boom said:

Some additional info on Leaderboard tiebreakers:

Apparently there's no such thing. According to IPS, ties are only split by whichever results are first pulled from the database. So in other words, a logical method isn't used.

An even bigger case for draws then...

That makes even less sense then, but on the bright side at least now we know why it's happening lol. It's too bad that the end users have limited control over some aspects/parameters of the software being used. 

5 hours ago, Cyclone Boom said:

After investigating this, it would seem both @dk1 and @bixel had a whole bunch of their existing STEX files liked. On each day, this caused them to acquire enough rep to claim the lead, and pip you to the post on both occasions. In bixel's case, a momentous gain indeed.

There were two separate users involved (which I won't bring to light here). Although from past & present evidence, we believe the circumstances for them liking the files was genuine, with no ill intent to prevent you winning the daily total. So based on that, we're reluctant to make changes which would reverse this and alter the standings. The community is in charge of these Leaderboards, and manually adjusting would take control away, and also set a precedent for the future.

If interested, it's possible to check by visiting the rep activity for dk1 and bixel on their profiles. Since these are single instances (each file), it explains why they aren't shown in the "Popular Content" list. On both days, the lowest individual item has 2 likes.

The fact that any content can be liked at any time, means this is really a limitation of the system. Exactly the same with new content, it's possible for older files, posts, or other items to receive rep, and count to that day's standings. So in theory, this means anyone with at least one content item can achieve this.

Looking back at the history, it seems this isn't the first time an inactive user has attained 1st place. I guess it's just one of those things which by chance, has occurred two days in a row whilst you were leading. Sorry about that!

(However, especially with your return to the CJ scene, I'm sure #47 can only be a matter of time.)  *;)


Oh that's totally cool, the only thing I was worried about was that it could of been a bug and I'm more than happy to hear that isn't the case. I can see what your saying going through the files and I have to say that I have absolutely no issues at all with the rep that was given. As far as I'm concerned anyone can give as many likes to anyone else at any point in time for whatever reason they so chose. In fact you don't have to go too far back to find a member who received 100 likes in a single day!(Feindbold Dec 6, 2016) And I'm guessing that reaching 100 wasn't exactly a coincidence *:lol: Perhaps if the members giving the likes had signed up that same day it might of seemed suspicious, which is not the case here as both have been members for years. But even if that was the case then I'm not sure if I'd agree with any action being taken. Who's to say they didn't legitimately sign up just so that they could give thanks to and support the work of that particular content creator. And those creators in question here; bixel & dk1, have both supplied outstanding content to the community so any rep points given to them is entirely deserved *:thumb: 

To be honest though I'm of the opinion that the daily leaderboard is a little bit silly. I'm guessing it was brought as more of a curiosity or as fun thing. But in the sense of using it as a measure of a persons contributions it's really not of much value. My total # of wins does make sense relative to my rep count but their are plenty of highly regarded members who don't punch any where near their weight such as Schulmanator & Ln X. It's something that's highly subject to random variation and often the worth of a contribution a member makes on any particular day isn't fully recognized/ disseminated until at least a few days after the fact, which is why I would be much more interested in a list of weekly or month leaders but for now I take it that the software isn't capable of showing those totals. *sigh* If only the leaderboard page wasn't so slow... Anyhow thanks again for looking into things.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, APSMS said:

I've been having that page refresh bug, too, in case it helps. I usually use Firefox, but have noticed the problem on other browsers as well. Refreshing manages to load the right page, but it takes a manual refresh, as otherwise the page merely hangs. Happened right here in this thread, too, as I was scanning back the archives to see if others had already reported it.

 

Just another user to add onto the pile of people reporting bugs, just so that the software providers have a harder time claiming it's isolated. *;)

I have the same problem. What is the reason?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Takingyouthere said:

I would be much more interested in a list of weekly or month leaders but for now I take it that the software isn't capable of showing those totals. *sigh*

You can get weekly and monthly totals on the Leaderboard page as noted in CB's post in the Site Updates & Announcements thread.

On 12/9/2016 at 6:49 PM, Cyclone Boom said:

On the top right side, there are several range filtering options, including:

1uKTIsm.png

 

And if you go to the Forums page and scroll down you'll find:

Leaders%20Forum%20Page_zpslsd8omhw.jpg

Where you can also select Month or Year or All Time. This one on the Forums page loads a lot quicker.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Takingyouthere said:

That makes even less sense then, but on the bright side at least now we know why it's happening lol. It's too bad that the end users have limited control over some aspects/parameters of the software being used.

Yes, clearly not much thought has gone into handling ties. The good news is with their intention to expand on the feature, I would suspect more options will be provided for the configuration. It does have enormous potential, and is quite a revolutionary addition for forum communities.

 

12 hours ago, Takingyouthere said:

As far as I'm concerned anyone can give as many likes to anyone else at any point in time for whatever reason they so chose.

We completely agree it's fair to allow this freedom, and glad to hear you're supportive of this.

 

12 hours ago, Takingyouthere said:

In fact you don't have to go too far back to find a member who received 100 likes in a single day!(Feindbold Dec 6, 2016) And I'm guessing that reaching 100 wasn't exactly a coincidence

Funnily enough for all users, there's a set limit of 100 rep allowed to give each day. So what happened there, I'm guessing someone went on a rampage and used up all their daily allowance at once! :whatevs:

However, we'd not be against considering a raise or removal of this limit.

 

12 hours ago, Takingyouthere said:

It's something that's highly subject to random variation and often the worth of a contribution a member makes on any particular day isn't fully recognized/ disseminated until at least a few days after the fact

That's a good point. Like with sample data, the more there is, the less opportunity for outliers to affect the result. But I suppose it could be seen both ways. By measuring a short timeframe, it does give more chance to a wider range of people. Say if someone made an exceptional post or CJ update, that might equate to enough rep alone to reach the daily summit. Where on a weekly or monthly basis, it more favours those who regularly make consistent contributions.

Perhaps having separate "winners" would make sense then, to reward both aspects.

 

10 hours ago, Silur said:

I have the same problem. What is the reason?

There could be a combination of factors. So to properly determine exactly what's going on, both the page loading and Leaderboard performance will need further investigation. If server related, it's possible fixing one may fix the other.

I'll report back with a progress update as and when more information comes to light. *:yes:

 

5 hours ago, CorinaMarie said:

Where you can also select Month or Year or All Time. This one on the Forums page loads a lot quicker.

Yes, although they may report different results than the Leaderboard, this widget does perform much better. I'd guess because it's simply retrieving the rep calculations, and not querying where the data is associated (i.e. posts).

There's also one at the bottom sidebar of the Activity feed, which is expanded to listing the top 20.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

@RandyE reported a bug to me in chat.  If one goes to a category of the STEX and attempts to upload a file you can get this far and then the drop down won't drop down.

Stex%20Upload%20Error_zps681w4a3d.jpg

*:(


  Edited by CorinaMarie

Replaced pic with PB version. (PB was doing maint so I used Imgur initially.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

1 hour ago, CorinaMarie said:

@RandyE reported a bug to me in chat.  If one goes to a category of the STEX and attempts to upload a file you can get this far and then the drop down won't drop down.

Thanks, I've made a note in my file and will get that forwarded as a priority.


Site Performance

A quick update on this:

Measures have been taken to mitigate the excessive bot activity. Since it's been an intermittent issue, an assessment will be made tomorrow to determine whether this was successful. From observation, it would seem to have been most noticeable around midday EST.

Efforts can then begin to address the exact causes of the performance drops (thread pages & leaderboards).

 

EDIT:

I've updated the bugs list on the initial page.


  Edited by Cyclone Boom
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/7/2017 at 6:53 AM, CorinaMarie said:

You can get weekly and monthly totals on the Leaderboard page as noted in CB's post in the Site Updates & Announcements thread.

Yeah but those are just the rolling total of the last 7 days what I wanted to see was the leaders from past individual weeks and months. One of which I've already taken care of *:)

On 3/7/2017 at 1:12 PM, Cyclone Boom said:

However, we'd not be against considering a raise or removal of this limit.

That's a good point. Like with sample data, the more there is, the less opportunity for outliers to affect the result. But I suppose it could be seen both ways. By measuring a short timeframe, it does give more chance to a wider range of people. Say if someone made an exceptional post or CJ update, that might equate to enough rep alone to reach the daily summit. Where on a weekly or monthly basis, it more favours those who regularly make consistent contributions.

Perhaps having separate "winners" would make sense then, to reward both aspects.

That's true. I guess I should look at it in the same as having more trixie's winners, that way more people can feel appreciated. It's just that I felt like the site was trumping the daily winners a little too strongly; having created an entire new section on the site for it, then having medals by our names and the total count of wins on a members home page. But I can understand the appeal to it. And I think that would add to it, having the weekly and monthly winners recognized in the same way on their user page.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We seem to have lost the Simtropolis regular smiling emoticon:

Missing%20Smile_zpsomrqs7oz.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, CorinaMarie said:

We seem to have lost the Simtropolis regular smiling emoticon:

That's strange, I was able to see it in the middle there:

oZd9lUD.png


Does it also appear missing from the "Simtropolis" category selection?

The smiley should be the first one at the top left:

5oPJo0k.png


Maybe it's worth trying a forced cache refresh (Ctrl+F5).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just did Ctrl+F5.

*:) <-- that was typing it. It acted like it was going to change, then didn't. And it's missing from the picker too. My first one shows the *;)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Cyclone Boom said:

I've tried an internal refresh of the emoticons list. Let me know if that worked or not.

*:)

Nope. Btw, I'm in FF. I'll come back and edit this with Chrome...

Ok, now in Chrome. *:) 

With it I see a little picture box, but still not the emoticon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cyclone Boom said:

Is it also missing for anyone else?

Yup. I'm seeing this:  aadf4bcbfa59401e8e0d0692a3a4cbd0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:ninja:  <-- Black Ninja Llama   :ooh:    I get 2 lists of emoticons, 1. Trixies (All Llamas), 2. Simtropolis (Standard Set).   :) The default set is Trixie Llamas.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so it only shows as a missing image?  --> *:)

It's quite puzzling how one emoticon, amongst the others, suddenly stops working in multiple browsers. For what it's worth, I'm not able to replicate this in Firefox, Chrome or IE, and can see all posted ":)" smilies in this thread...


A few other questions to anyone encountering the issue:

  • Has it just been noticeable today?  If not, when did it first occur for you?
  • Can you view the image directly?  If so, maybe try a Ctrl+F5 refresh from there.
  • Does it make any difference embedding using the URL?  Like so: *:)
  • Is the image visible in posts made by other users?  (I assume not)


Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Editing in: I just noticed the problem moments before I posted about it originally.

Here's a s/s of your post while I'm using FF:

ST%20CB%20Smile%20Post_zps8qhbki1t.jpg

And here's what I get when I try to go to your Directly link:

ST%20Smile%20Direct_zpsrwud5j4w.jpg

^ Ctrl+F5 whilst there does nothing useful.

So, apparently, ST feels I've smiled too much and I've used up my quota. :cry:

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks. bzt.gif

Guess what? The bug has caught up... :uhm:

After trying another force refresh myself (which I also did earlier), I'm also not seeing the smiley anywhere. Also get that same error when visiting directly.

Since there has been a delay, this may suggest an issue with server caching from Cloudflare (the CDN used by the site). As this is a clustered service around the globe, it may have taken a while for the issue to spread to different regions.

Very strange indeed... But at least now I'm seeing it first hand, it's a little easier to try and investigate what's going on.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Cyclone Boom said:

... it may have taken a while for the issue to spread to different regions.

Ah. My ISP sends the electrons at nearly the speed of light. I guess others are still using carrier pigeons. o.O

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without carrying a smile, that'd be a grumpy pigeon right now. *:lol:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK great news, I think I've now successfully restored the missing smiley! *:)

Basically, I've replaced it using the same configuration as before (filename and shortcut + HD version). So if gone according to plan, this should allow a smooth transition -- All existing instances on the site loading again, with it restored in the menu as the 1st item. Otherwise it might be worth another force browser refresh (Ctrl+F5) to once again load the image into memory.

Yet another situation which underlines the critical importance of backups. You never know when they might be needed, even for a small 2KB file.


As to what caused this, the prime suspect is: :)

It makes you wonder whether this llama or its accomplices are somehow responsible. However, as they were first witnessed around 2 weeks ago, orderly queuing outside the Llama Pen, there is no conclusive evidence to prove this.

In all seriousness, clearly the image had disappeared from the server, and that "1S160/2" error code was indeed a fancy way of saying the good old "404 Not Found". My theory is there was a conflict with the llamas or initial failure with an upload, and it's somehow taken this long for the issue to propagate. If the original working smiley was cached, it's plausible Cloudflare may have caused the delay in being detected. But in truth, this is mere speculation, and we'll probably never know for sure...


For all intents and purposes, this can be forever known as "The Mystery of the Missing Emoji"

*:)

 


STEX Upload Selector

In other developments, I'm also pleased to report Dirk has promptly fixed the STEX category dropdown:
 

HKOX1sa.png

 

I imagine they'll take a little longer, but next on the agenda is the page loading & Leaderboard performance.

Thanks everyone!

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*:) Yep. *:) I can use them again. *:) The only evidence that they had gone missing are the screenshots. *:)

*Cori presents @Cyclone Boom with another BEE award*

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, CorinaMarie said:

Ah. My ISP sends the electrons at nearly the speed of light. I guess others are still using carrier pigeons. o.O

My ISP sends them at that speed, too, but when you have satellite internet, this still means a minimum response time of over 1/4 second (45 000 mi @ 186 000 mi/s), not counting server processing time and the fact that space-based electronics are usually years behind what's available currently on the ground. Average ping: between 700 and 1200ms.

Plus it can never decide if I'm in Arizona, Iowa, or the South Pacific, despite the fact that they only service the US (and you know whereabouts I am IRL anyways).

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ran into this while accessing the home page today

18j2Hyl.jpg

 

...Unable to reproduce, hope others can't as well.

 

Although I kinda like it ;)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Haljackey said:

Ran into this while accessing the home page today

I'd suspect a brief server hiccup or the like. I've noticed something similar on rare occasions when a page doesn't complete loading.

Let us know should it happen again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, incomplete loading of the CSS, happened to me once or twice on the phone, mainly over Opera Mini.

And definitely it looks very cool with the transparent background of the avatar!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That has also happened to me a couple if times, I just refresh the page and everything's back to normal.

I've been having a weird issue when trying to change the page on threads, it doesn't load, I have to refresh the tab for it to load properly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Edvarz said:

That has also happened to me a couple if times, I just refresh the page and everything's back to normal.

I've been having a weird issue when trying to change the page on threads, it doesn't load, I have to refresh the tab for it to load properly.

It work for me well today, but I had same problem before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an Account  

Sign up to join our friendly community. It's easy!  :thumb:


Register a New Account

Sign In  

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now


  •  
  • Similar Content

    • By manueld832
      So I started building RHW(new to RHW btw) to reduce regional traffic then I notice that the trucks are constantly changing lanes or doing a zigzag movement........please help!!! 
      Here's a photo https://www.dropbox.com/s/6gij4k6il26idqj/20170329_232144.jpg?dl=0
    • By mike_154
      i want to donate money to you guys,for your great work here at simtropolis, but i can not because paypal is not responding.Why dont you guys make an open pay system for credit cards,then we do not need this hassle. 
    • By Cyclone Boom

      Our friends at GOG.com had a special City-Builder discount sale!  (Closed as of February 13, 2PM GMT) 

      As part of this, Simtropolis has been given a bunch of free keys to selected games to give away!
      Winners announced here!

      If you want one of these games, simply reply to this thread by answering ONE of the questions below:
      What's your favourite city-building game, and why will you always be fond of it? Write a creative and entertaining review (good or bad) of any city-building game. The ways in which custom content has transformed the city-building game you play. Tell us about your most memorable city-building experience, funny, tragic or otherwise.
      There is no minimum or maximum, but aim to write at least 50 words.
       
      FAQ

      Q: How are prize winners selected?
      A: The Admins will pick their favourite replies below, so don't delay, post away!
      Q: How many times can I reply?
      A: Just one reply per person please.
      Q: Can I add images or video to my post?
      A: Sure! Feel free to be creative to make your post stand out.
      Q: Does it have to be written in a certain style?
      A: No, not at all. Just aim to make it creative and entertaining, whether fact or fiction...
      Q: How long does this run for?
      A: The closing date to enter is Monday 13th February at 23:59 (EST).
       
      Prizes

      Winners will be able to select ONE of the following City-Building classics, to add to their personal collection:
       
      Caesar
      1993

      SimCity 2000 Special Edition
      1995

      Caesar II
      1995

      Pharaoh + Cleopatra
      1999

      SimCity 3000 Unlimited
      2000

      Emperor: Rise of the Middle Kingdom
      2002

      Banished
      2014

      Tropico 5
      2014

      Lethis - Path of Progress
      2015

      Urban Empire
      2017

       
      Whatever your experience with a City-Builder, we'd love to hear it.
       
    • By Cyclone Boom
      Got some ideas?
      Here's a place where you can recommend any improvements to Simtropolis. 
      It's about time we had one of these. Even though the site continues to develop, we'd love to hear your thoughts on how it can be further refined and made better for everyone. Whether it be a simple layout/design tweak, or a completely brand new feature, post away in this thread!
      While we can't promise everything will be possible or implemented, each idea will be read and considered. I'm sure you'll appreciate there are limitations, both technically and financially.
      To report any issues with an existing site feature, or something not working as intended, please instead use the Bugs Thread.
       
      Guidelines
      For clarity, please keep one idea per post. Double posts are acceptable if you've more than one idea at once.
      Note: To prevent successive replies from auto-merging, you may need to wait 5 minutes.
        Give a subheading, describing briefly what the idea is.
        Explain the idea -- it helps to give as much detail as possible. Pictures or diagrams are acceptable, but not required.
        Why would this be of benefit to the community?
        If you value anyone's idea, please Like it to show your support. This helps to give a rough indication of how well an idea is received.
        If commenting on an idea, please quote/copy the subheading so it's clear what is being discussed.  
      Progress Status
      Once processed, ideas will be tagged with one of the following:
       
      NOT PLANNED -    The idea is appreciated, but at this stage, is not feasible to implement.
        INTERNAL REVIEW -    We like the idea, and will pursue whether it's currently feasible to implement.
        PLANNED -    We have decided to implement the idea, and are finding the best ways to go about it.
        IMPLEMENTED -    The idea has been added as a new site feature!
      This will change depending on ongoing progress with implementation.
       
      Thanks all!
      -The Admins
    • By Cyclone Boom
      Index of Display Name Changes 

      Display name changes can sometimes create confusion, especially when the new name is completely unrelated to the old one.
      Since there have been a number of recent changes, I think it might be useful to have a resource where these can be documented.
      For general information about name changes, please see the FAQ in the following post.

      If you're aware of a change that isn't listed, or have recently changed your own, please post below and I'll add you to the table.

      The table below lists the known changes, along with the dates and original names. For those where the date is uncertain, a reasonable estimate has been made (based on their posts referring to the name -- e.g. quotes). For users who've changed their name more than once, the "Other Changes" column provides these details. The links open a document on Google Drive, where this info is presented.
       
      (89 total listed changes)   Current Name   Original Name     Last Changed Date        Other Changes?      __A   mystic_destiny Feb-27-2014 -   _Jazz   Yoshiisland Apr-18-2013 [1]   _Michael   michae95l Jul-18-2016 -   A Nonny Moose   N_O_Body c. 2007 -   §haÅ--Ñ€ §hÅŽo   Sirron Kcuhc Jun-09-2013 -   Ace❤   10000000000000 Mar-11-2013 -   airman15   usfighter15 May-05-2013 -   Asser   Kaalakiota Apr-06-2014 -   AvidCSMapmaker   freakyshare32 Mar-11-2015 -   C4The_Architect   C4creeper May-01-2015 -   catty-cb   Catty@sc4d Jun-15-2013 -   Ceafus 88   Frex_Ceafus Feb-18-2013 -   Chris M   ЮàgÕÑÅÑÌMĖ Apr-12-2013 [1]   CoastRunner   nickie Jan-04-2013 -   Cockatoo   Cockatoo-210893 c. 2011 -   Craig-Abcvs   abcvs c. 2010 -   Dashafrash.   AndrewMar Jul-14-2014 -   Dirktator   dirk c. 2011 -   djrules5454   djrules5454_simtropolisedition    c. 2010 -   Durfsurn   durfsurn Jun-21-2013 -   Eʟᴇᴍᴇɴᴛ   elemented9 c. 2011 -   Empowered One   afstandopleren Sep-09-2013 -   Follarch   Archean Apr-13-2012 -   Forthwall   Mastof Dec-23-2012 -   FreezyPop   10goliath Sep-11-2013 -   Ganaram Inukshuk   Ganaram DI Jun-24-2012 -   Haljackey   haljackey Apr-28-2012 -   ized   pringlized May-20-2015 -   Jack³   jack3oh3 Jun-11-2013 -   JakeMD   swat-medic Apr-17-2012 -   Jeffmaster223   Animaniacs Nov-12-2013 -   JP Schriefer   Schriefer Oct-25-2014 -   k50   k50dude Jun-21-2012 -   KaZZ   testuser1234 Nov-18-2013 -   Kevin   Cheese89 c. 2010 -   Kifflom112   Zulu2065 Dec-20-2012 -   Kisa Atsuko   976 Mar-09-2014 -   LarksTonguesInAspic   manticorefan May-31-2013 -   Lyhoko Leaci   Leech10 Dec-08-2011 -   MandelSoft   mrtnrln Jun-21-2012 -   Mary Maurine Mayo   Lynks Aug-12-2013 [2]   Meg   SkiGeek c. 2009 -   Monster's Cat   MatthewB13 Oct-09-2014 [1]   Mr Saturn64   crazyllamasim Dec-24-2012 -   Nesral Sredna   Aakl Feb-07-2015 -   Nilo7   DCMetro34 May-13-2014 [1]   OcramsRzr   Ilikeseattle Jan-21-2016 [1]   OreoToast   Quaellen_Wins2 Oct-28-2014 -   Pasta-power   J-man-42 Feb-11-2013 -   reaps   reaper88 Dec-31-2012 -   Reddonquixote   reddonquixote Oct-19-2014 -   redhairtwiggy   BlondeTwiggy Mar-30-2014 -   RepublicMaster   wcraig Dec-24-2012 -   Sabretooth78   sargeantcm Jun-17-2014 -   Samness   samness7 Jul-18-2014 -   SAVAGExPHOENIX   daTSchikinhed Dec-10-2014 -   sc3kufan   Casselsucks Sep-25-2015 [1]   SC4B   sim city 4 builder Feb-11-2015 -   Sexysark:P   sarthakknight Nov-24-2014 -   Shadow Assassin   Shadow_Assassin c. 2011 -   simlink   sim_link Mar-03-2014 -   Skyler_Americano   Johnathan_Tycoon Jun-11-2015 -   Slashback   ImVhOzzi Jul-02-2013 -   SounderBruce   ComputerGuy890100 c. 2011 -   SpookyZalost   Leo_the_robot Apr-09-2013 -   Takingyouthere   take_me_there Jul-29-2016 [1]   Terring   terring Jun-04-2013 -   The Avatar   MamaLuigi945 Sep-06-2014 [1]   The Pennsylvania Turnpike      Mayorjacks Aug-25-2013 -   Thin White Duke   AmericanSwede11 May-23-2016 [2]   Titanicbuff   titanicbuff Jun-05-2013 -   Tonraq   111222333444 Jan-18-2014 -   Toothless Stitch   skyscraper241 Aug-01-2014 [1]   w_swietwoot   wasoethoudt Apr-28-2012 -   Wahrheit   Blue Lightning May-19-2015 -   Yarahi   yarahi Jun-26-2015 -  
      Username = Multiple changes.
      Username = Pre Simtropolis 7.0 change.
       
       Reminder:   Due to the site upgrade, remember that display names are now the same as usernames! 
      As Dirk explained here, this replaces the previous system, where your registration username was always used to login. If you've changed your display name, you should always login using the current one. This may explain if you're experiencing difficulty logging in.
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.